testing any of the strange driver behavior. We already have some tiny
tests for the driver behavior, and I'm going to expand them greatly in
the next commit.
llvm-svn: 154290
- The [class.protected] restriction is non-trivial for any instance
member, even if the access lacks an object (for example, if it's
a pointer-to-member constant). In this case, it is equivalent to
requiring the naming class to equal the context class.
- The [class.protected] restriction applies to accesses to constructors
and destructors. A protected constructor or destructor can only be
used to create or destroy a base subobject, as a direct result.
- Several places were dropping or misapplying object information.
The standard could really be much clearer about what the object type is
supposed to be in some of these accesses. Usually it's easy enough to
find a reasonable answer, but still, the standard makes a very confident
statement about accesses to instance members only being possible in
either pointer-to-member literals or member access expressions, which
just completely ignores concepts like constructor and destructor
calls, using declarations, unevaluated field references, etc.
llvm-svn: 154248
However, the '-x' option has special handling and wasn't following this
paradigm. Fix it to do so by claiming the arg as we parse the '-x' option.
rdar://11203340
llvm-svn: 154231
In a few cases clang emitted a rather content-free diagnostic: 'parse error'.
This change replaces two actual cases (template parameter parsing and K&R
parameter declaration parsing) with more specific diagnostics and removes a
third dead case of this in the BalancedDelimiterTracker (the ctor already
checked the invariant necessary to ensure that the diag::parse_error was never
actually used).
llvm-svn: 154224
we use the same Expr* as the one being currently visited. This is preparation for transitioning to having
ProgramPoints refer to CFGStmts.
This required a bit of trickery. We wish to keep the old Expr* bindings in the Environment intact,
as plenty of logic relies on it and there is no reason to change it, but we sometimes want the Stmt* for
the ProgramPoint to be different than the Expr* being used for bindings. This requires adding an extra
argument for some functions (e.g., evalLocation). This looks a bit strange for some clients, but
it will look a lot cleaner when were start using CFGStmt* in the appropriate places.
As some fallout, the diagnostics arrows are a bit difference, since some of the node locations have changed.
I have audited these, and they look reasonable.
llvm-svn: 154214
global destructor entry. For some reason this isn't enabled for
apple-kexts; it'd be good to have documentation for that.
Based on a patch by Nakamura Takumi!
llvm-svn: 154191
the template instantiation of statement-expressions.
I think it was jyasskin who had a crashing testcase in this area;
hopefully this fixes it and he can find his testcase and check it in.
llvm-svn: 154189
The warning this inhibits, -Wobjc-root-class, is opt-in for now. However, all clang unit tests that would trigger
the warning have been updated to use -Wno-objc-root-class. <rdar://problem/7446698>
llvm-svn: 154187
inside of a sysroot targeting a system+sysroot which is "similar" or
"compatible" with the host system. This shows up when trying to build
system images on largely compatible hardware as-if fully cross compiled.
The problem is that previously we *perfectly* mimiced GCC here, and it
turns out GCC has a bug that no one has really stumbled across. GCC will
try to look in thy system prefix ('/usr/local' f.ex.) into which it is
instaled to find libraries installed along side GCC that should be
preferred to the base system libraries ('/usr' f.ex.). This seems not
unreasonable, but it has a very unfortunate consequence when combined
with a '--sysroot' which does *not* contain the GCC installation we're
using to complete the toolchain. That results in some of the host
system's library directories being searched during the link.
Now, it so happens that most folks doing stuff like this use
'--with-sysroot' and '--disable-multilib' when configuring GCC. Even
better, they're usually not cross-compiling to a target that is similar
to the host. As a result, searching the host for libraries doesn't
really matter -- most of the time weird directories get appended that
don't exist (no arm triple lib directory, etc). Even if you're
cross-compiling from 32-bit to 64-bit x86 or vice-versa, disabling
multilib makes it less likely that you'll actually find viable libraries
on the host. But that's just luck. We shouldn't rely on this, and this
patch disables looking in the system prefix containing the GCC
installation if that system prefix is *outside* of the sysroot. For
empty sysroots, this has no effect. Similarly, when using the GCC
*inside* of the sysroot, we still track wherever it is installed within
the sysroot and look there for libraries. But now we can use a cross
compiler GCC installation outside the system root, and only look for the
crtbegin.o in the GCC installation, and look for all the other libraries
inside the system root.
This should fix PR12478, allowing Clang to be used when building
a ChromiumOS image without polluting the image with libraries from the
host system.
llvm-svn: 154176
Based on Doug's feedback to r153887 this omits the FixIt if the following token
isn't syntactically valid for the context. (not a comma, '...', identifier,
'>', or '>>')
There's a bunch of work to handle the '>>' case, but it makes for a much more
pleasant diagnostic in this case.
llvm-svn: 154163
a constant expression' error into a DefaultError ExtWarn, so that it can be
disabled and is suppressed in system headers. libstdc++4.7 contains some such
functions which we currently can't evaluate as constant expressions.
llvm-svn: 154115
- Developers of system frameworks need a way for their framework to be treated as a "system framework" during development. Otherwise, they are unable to properly test how their framework behaves when installed because of the semantic changes (in warning behavior) applied to system frameworks.
llvm-svn: 154105
* s/nonstatic/non-static/ in the diagnostics, since the latter form outvoted
the former by 28-2 in our diagnostics.
* Fix the "use of member in static member function" diagnostic to correctly
detect this situation inside a block or lambda.
* Produce a more specific "invalid use of non-static member" diagnostic for
the case where a nested class member refers to a member of a
lexically-surrounding class.
llvm-svn: 154073
String literals (including unicode ones) can contain non-Unicode codepoints
if they were written using \x or similar. Write those out using \x, but be
careful that the following character can't be misinterpreted as part of the
\x escape sequence. Convert UTF-16 surrogate pairs back to codepoints before
rendering them.
llvm-svn: 154069
This diagnostic seems to be production ready, it's just an oversight that it
wasn't turned on by default.
The test changes are a bit of a mixed bag. Some tests that seemed like they
clearly didn't need to use this behavior have been modified not to use it.
Others that I couldn't be sure about, I added the necessary expected-warnings
to.
It's possible the diagnostic message could be improved to make it clearer that
this warning can be suppressed by using a value that won't lose precision when
converted to the target type (but can still be a floating point literal, such
as "bool b = 1.0;").
llvm-svn: 154068
Chandler Carruth