only two addressing mode nodes, SPUaform and SPUindirect (vice the
three previous ones, SPUaform, SPUdform and SPUxform). This improves
code somewhat because we now avoid using reg+reg addressing when
it can be avoided. It also simplifies the address selection logic,
which was the main point for doing this.
Also, for various global variables that would be loaded using SPU's
A-form addressing, prefer D-form offs[reg] addressing, keeping the
base in a register if the variable is used more than once.
llvm-svn: 46483
way or the other. Rewriting the code itself prevents subsequent analysis
passes from making contradictory conclusions about the code that could
cause an infeasible path to be made feasible.
llvm-svn: 46427
registers if used by a bitconvert or using a bitconvert. This allows us to
avoid constant pool loads and use cheaper integer instructions when the
values come from or end up in integer regs anyway. For example, we now
compile CodeGen/X86/fp-in-intregs.ll to:
_test1:
movl $2147483648, %eax
xorl 4(%esp), %eax
ret
_test2:
movl $1065353216, %eax
orl 4(%esp), %eax
andl $3212836864, %eax
ret
Instead of:
_test1:
movss 4(%esp), %xmm0
xorps LCPI2_0, %xmm0
movd %xmm0, %eax
ret
_test2:
movss 4(%esp), %xmm0
andps LCPI3_0, %xmm0
movss LCPI3_1, %xmm1
andps LCPI3_2, %xmm1
orps %xmm0, %xmm1
movd %xmm1, %eax
ret
bitconverts can happen due to various calling conventions that require
fp values to passed in integer regs in some cases, e.g. when returning
a complex.
llvm-svn: 46414
void bork() {
int *address = 0;
*address = 0;
}
It's compiled into LLVM code that looks like this:
define void @bork() noreturn nounwind {
entry:
unreachable
}
This is bad on some platforms (like PPC) because it will generate the label for
the function but no body. The label could end up being associated with some
non-code related stuff, like a section. This places a "trap" instruction if the
SimplifyCFG pass removed all code from the function leaving only one
"unreachable" instruction.
llvm-svn: 46387
delete a node even if it was not dead in some cases. Instead, just add it to
the worklist. Also, make sure to use the CombineTo methods, as it was doing
things that were unsafe: the top level combine loop could touch dangling memory.
This fixes CodeGen/Generic/2008-01-25-dag-combine-mul.ll
llvm-svn: 46384
This case returns the value in ST(0) and then has to convert it to an SSE
register. This causes significant codegen ugliness in some cases. For
example in the trivial fp-stack-direct-ret.ll testcase we used to generate:
_bar:
subl $28, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstpl 16(%esp)
movsd 16(%esp), %xmm0
movsd %xmm0, 8(%esp)
fldl 8(%esp)
addl $28, %esp
ret
because we move the result of foo() into an XMM register, then have to
move it back for the return of bar.
Instead of hacking ever-more special cases into the call result lowering code
we take a much simpler approach: on x86-32, fp return is modeled as always
returning into an f80 register which is then truncated to f32 or f64 as needed.
Similarly for a result, we model it as an extension to f80 + return.
This exposes the truncate and extensions to the dag combiner, allowing target
independent code to hack on them, eliminating them in this case. This gives
us this code for the example above:
_bar:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
addl $12, %esp
ret
The nasty aspect of this is that these conversions are not legal, but we want
the second pass of dag combiner (post-legalize) to be able to hack on them.
To handle this, we lie to legalize and say they are legal, then custom expand
them on entry to the isel pass (PreprocessForFPConvert). This is gross, but
less gross than the code it is replacing :)
This also allows us to generate better code in several other cases. For
example on fp-stack-ret-conv.ll, we now generate:
_test:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstps 8(%esp)
movl 16(%esp), %eax
cvtss2sd 8(%esp), %xmm0
movsd %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $12, %esp
ret
where before we produced (incidentally, the old bad code is identical to what
gcc produces):
_test:
subl $12, %esp
call L_foo$stub
fstpl (%esp)
cvtsd2ss (%esp), %xmm0
cvtss2sd %xmm0, %xmm0
movl 16(%esp), %eax
movsd %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $12, %esp
ret
Note that we generate slightly worse code on pr1505b.ll due to a scheduling
deficiency that is unrelated to this patch.
llvm-svn: 46307
Lauro Ramos Venancio