This makes them consistent (many comments already used uppercase).
The special REQUIRES, UNSUPPORTED, and XFAIL comments are excluded from this change.
llvm-svn: 309468
This diff removes the second argument of the method MachOObjectFile::exports.
In all in-tree uses this argument is equal to "this" and
without this argument the interface seems to be cleaner.
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 309462
On some targets, passing zero to the clz() or ctz() builtins has undefined
behavior. I ran into this issue while debugging UB in __hash_table from libcxx:
the bug I was seeing manifested itself differently under -O0 vs -Os, due to a
UB call to clz() (see: libcxx/r304617).
This patch introduces a check which can detect UB calls to builtins.
llvm.org/PR26979
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34590
llvm-svn: 309459
When I tried running the script, the ARM regex parser could not parse
my code. It failed because the .Lfunc_end line has a comment at the
end of it, so this commit removes the newline at the end of the regex.
Patch by Joel Galenson!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35641
llvm-svn: 309457
Summary:
This exposes LTO's Conf.SampleProfile as a command line option
(-lto-sample-profile-file) for testing via the llvm-lto2 utility.
Reviewers: pcc, danielcdh
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36030
llvm-svn: 309456
Summary:
Inlining threshold is increased by application of bonuses when the
callee has a single reachable basic block or is rich in vector
instructions. Similarly, inlining cost is reduced by applying a large
bonus when the last call to a static function is considered for
inlining. This patch disables the application of these bonuses when the
callsite or the callee is cold. The intention here is to prevent a large
cold callsite from being inlined to a non-cold caller that could prevent
the caller from being inlined. This is especially important when the
cold callsite is a last call to a static since the associated bonus is
very high.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl
Subscribers: danielcdh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35823
llvm-svn: 309441
This should fix googletest-format test failures on the clang modules
buildbots, which have a stale copy of the OneTest script in the build
directory.
llvm-svn: 309432
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
Summary:
After some changes in SLP vectorizer we missed some additional checks to
limit the instructions for vectorization. We should not perform analysis
of the instructions if the parent of instruction is not the same as the
parent of the first instruction in the tree or it was analyzed already.
Subscribers: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34881
llvm-svn: 309425
Summary:
Included is one test for passing structs by value and one test for
passing C++
objects by value.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34827
llvm-svn: 309424
The conditional tail call logic did the wrong thing when both
destinations of a conditional branch were the same:
BB#1: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %EFLAGS
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#0
JE_1 <BB#5>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill>
JMP_1 <BB#5>
BB#5: derived from LLVM BB %sw.epilog
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#1
TCRETURNdi64 <ga:@mergeable_conditional_tailcall>, 0, ...
We would fold the JE_1 to a TCRETURNdi64cc, and then remove our BB#5
successor. Then BB#5 would be deleted as it had no predecessors, leaving
a dangling "JMP_1 <BB#5>" reference behind to cause assertions later.
This patch checks that both conditional branch destinations are
different before doing the transform. The standard branch folding logic
is able to remove both the JMP_1 and the JE_1, and for my test case we
end up forming a better conditional tail call later.
Fixes PR33980
llvm-svn: 309422
ScopStmt::contains is currently implemented on the basis of BasicBlock
and does not take the instruction list into account. Therefore any
instruction copied by -polly-optree into another statement currently
triggers that assertion.
Remove that assertion for now. We might re-enable it when the
implementation of ScopStmt::contains changes.
llvm-svn: 309421
This allows handling of a lot more of the interesting
cases in Blender. Most of the large functions unlikely
to be inlined have this pattern.
This is a special case for what clang emits for OpenCL 3
element vectors. Annoyingly, these are emitted as
<3 x elt>* pointers, but accessed as <4 x elt>* operations.
This also needs to handle cases where a struct containing
a single vector is used.
llvm-svn: 309419
It is better to return arguments directly in registers
if we are making a call rather than introducing expensive
stack usage. In one of sample compile from one of
Blender's many kernel variants, this fires on about
~20 different functions. Future improvements may be to
recognize simple cases where the pointer is indexing a small
array. This also fails when the store to the out argument
is in a separate block from the return, which happens in
a few of the Blender functions. This should also probably
be using MemorySSA which might help with that.
I'm not sure this is correct as a FunctionPass, but
MemoryDependenceAnalysis seems to not work with
a ModulePass.
I'm also not sure where it should run.I think it should
run before DeadArgumentElimination, so maybe either
EP_CGSCCOptimizerLate or EP_ScalarOptimizerLate.
llvm-svn: 309416