parameter node and use this to correctly mangle parameter
references in function template signatures.
A follow-up patch will improve the storage usage of these
fields; here I've just done the lazy thing.
llvm-svn: 130669
Patch authored by John Wiegley.
These are array type traits used for parsing code that employs certain
features of the Embarcadero C++ compiler: __array_rank(T) and
__array_extent(T, Dim).
llvm-svn: 130351
Patch authored by David Abrahams.
These two expression traits (__is_lvalue_expr, __is_rvalue_expr) are used for
parsing code that employs certain features of the Embarcadero C++ compiler.
llvm-svn: 130122
instantiation), be sure to add the transformed declaration into the
current DeclContext. Also, remove the -Wuninitialized hack that works
around this bug. Fixes <rdar://problem/9200676>.
llvm-svn: 129544
This patch authored by Eric Niebler.
Many methods on the Sema class (e.g. ConvertPropertyForRValue) take Expr
pointers as in/out parameters (Expr *&). This is especially true for the
routines that apply implicit conversions to nodes in-place. This design is
workable only as long as those conversions cannot fail. If they are allowed
to fail, they need a way to report their failures. The typical way of doing
this in clang is to use an ExprResult, which has an extra bit to signal a
valid/invalid state. Returning ExprResult is de riguour elsewhere in the Sema
interface. We suggest changing the Expr *& parameters in the Sema interface
to ExprResult &. This increases interface consistency and maintainability.
This interface change is important for work supporting MS-style C++
properties. For reasons explained here
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-February/013180.html>,
seemingly trivial operations like rvalue/lvalue conversions that formerly
could not fail now can. (The reason is that given the semantics of the
feature, getter/setter method lookup cannot happen until the point of use, at
which point it may be found that the method does not exist, or it may have the
wrong type, or overload resolution may fail, or it may be inaccessible.)
llvm-svn: 129143
location into a TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc. These were found using
a hand-written program to inspect every source location in
TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs and Valgrind. I don't know of any way to
test them in Clang's existing test suite sadly.
Example code that triggers the ElaboratedType case:
template <typename T> struct X1 {
template <typename U> struct X1_1 {
int x;
};
};
template <typename T, typename U> struct X2 {
typename X1<T>::template X1_1<U> B;
};
X2<char, int> x2;
The other fix was simply spotted by inspection. I audited all constructions of
[Dependent]TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs in TreeTransform.h, and the rest set
the TemplateNameLoc properly.
llvm-svn: 128702
to set the source-location information for the template arguments to
the *transformed* source-location information, not the original
source-location information. Fixes <rdar://problem/8986308> (a libc++
SFINAE issue) and the Boost.Polygon failure.
llvm-svn: 127150
transform the type that replaces the template type parameter. In the
vast majority of cases, there's nothing to do, because most template
type parameters are replaced with something non-dependent that doesn't
need further transformation. However, when we're dealing with the
default template arguments of template template parameters, we might
end up replacing a template parameter (of the template template
parameter) with a template parameter of the enclosing template.
This addresses part of PR9016, but not within function
templates. That's a separate issue.
llvm-svn: 127091
DependentTemplateSpecializationType during tree transformation, retain
the NestedNameSpecifierLoc as it was used to translate the template
name, rather than reconstructing it from the template name.
Fixes PR9401.
llvm-svn: 127015
parameter, save the instantiated default template arguments along with
the explicitly-specified template argument list. That way, we prefer
the default template template arguments corresponding to the template
template parameter rather than those of its template template argument.
This addresses the likely direction of C++ core issue 150, and fixes
PR9353/<rdar://problem/9069136>, bringing us closer to the behavior of
EDG and GCC.
llvm-svn: 126920
TreeTransform::TransformDependentTemplateSpecializationType() with
poor source-location information handling. All of the
CXXScopeSpec::MakeTrivial() and
NestedNameSpecifierLocBuilder::MakeTrivial() callers actually make
sense now.
llvm-svn: 126856
source-location-preserving
TreeTransform::TranformNestedNameSpecifierLoc(). No functionality
change: the victim had no callers (that themselves had callers) anyway.
llvm-svn: 126853
template arguments. I believe that this is the last place in the AST
where we were storing a source range for a nested-name-specifier
rather than a proper nested-name-specifier location structure. (Yay!)
There is still a lot of cleanup to do in the TreeTransform, which
doesn't take advantage of nested-name-specifiers with source-location
information everywhere it could.
llvm-svn: 126844
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
template specialization types. There are still a few rough edges to
clean up with some of the parser actions dropping
nested-name-specifiers too early.
llvm-svn: 126776
nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind
Fixes in this iteration include:
(1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
in a member access expression
dep->template f<T>::f()
This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
specialization types). But the real problem was...
(2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
specialization types, but it was the source of the
valgrind errors on the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 126765
information for qualifier type names throughout the parser to address
several problems.
The commit message from r126737:
Push nested-name-specifier source location information into elaborated
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126748
name types, e.g., "enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind".
Aside from the normal changes, this also required some tweaks to the
parser. Essentially, when we're looking at a type name (via
getTypeName()) specifically for the purpose of creating an annotation
token, we pass down the flag that asks for full type-source location
information to be stored within the returned type. That way, we retain
source-location information involving nested-name-specifiers rather
than trying to reconstruct that information later, long after it's
been lost in the parser.
With this change, test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp is showing
much improved results again, since that code has lots of
nested-name-specifiers.
llvm-svn: 126737
DependentNameTypeLoc. Teach the recursive AST visitor and libclang how to
walk DependentNameTypeLoc nodes.
Also, teach libclang about TypedefDecl source ranges, so that we get
those. The massive churn in test/Index/recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp
is a good thing: we're annotating a lot more of this test correctly
now.
llvm-svn: 126729
source-location information. We don't actually preserve this
information in any of the resulting TypeLocs (yet), so it doesn't
matter.
llvm-svn: 126693
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr.
Also, improve the computation that checks whether the base of a member
expression (either unresolved or dependent-scoped) is implicit. The
previous check didn't cover all of the cases we use in our
representation, which threw off source-location information for these
expressions (which, in turn, caused some breakage in libclang's token
annotation).
llvm-svn: 126681
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr, and clean up instantiation of
nested-name-specifiers with dependent template specialization types in
the process.
llvm-svn: 126663
dependent template names. There is still a lot of redundant code in
TreeTransform to cope with TemplateSpecializationTypes, which I'll
remove in stages.
llvm-svn: 126656
nested-name-specifier, e.g.,
T::template apply<U>::
represent the dependent template name specialization as a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType, rather than a
TemplateSpecializationType with a dependent TemplateName.
llvm-svn: 126593
Richard Smith