member functions by making sure that they're on the record before
checking for deletion.
Also make sure source locations are valid to avoid crashes.
Unfortunately, the declare-all-implicit-members approach is still
required in order to ensure that dependency loops do not result in
incorrectly deleting functions (since they are to be deleted at the
declaration point per the standard).
Fixes PR9917
llvm-svn: 131520
I hear at least one person crying out in anguish, but it's unfortunately
necessary to avoid infinite loops with mutually dependent constructors
trying to call each other and determine if they are deleted.
It might be possible to go back to the old behavior if we can implement
part-of-file lookups efficiently, or if a solution is discovered by
which we can safely detect and avoid infinite recusion.
llvm-svn: 131515
nested-name-specifier, re-evaluate the nested-name-specifier as if we
were entering that context (which we did!), so that we'll resolve a
template-id to a particular class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR9913.
llvm-svn: 131383
There are APIs, e.g. [NSValue valueWithBytes:objCType:], which use the encoding to find out
the size of an object pointed to by a pointer. Make things safer by making it illegal to @encode
incomplete types.
llvm-svn: 131364
template<class U>
struct X1 {
template<class T> void f(T*);
template<> void f(int*) { }
};
Won't be so simple. I need to think more about it.
llvm-svn: 131362
template parameter lists to scope specifiers for friend declarations
about injected class name types. Fixes the
g++.dg/template/memfriend5.C regression in the GCC testsuite.
llvm-svn: 131272
don't build circular AST in protocol's protocol list
when user code has introduced it. Indexer and other
clients may crash. // rdar://9221614
llvm-svn: 131254
They are actually grammatically considered definitions and parsed
accordingly.
This fixes the outstanding bugs regarding defaulting functions after
their declarations.
We now really nicely diagnose the following construct (try it!)
int foo() = delete, bar;
Still todo: Defaulted functions other than default constructors
Test cases (including for the above construct)
llvm-svn: 131228
defaulted default constructors.
As it happens, making sure that we handle out-of-line defaulted
functions properly will involved making sure that we actually parse them
correctly, so that's coming after.
llvm-svn: 131224
nested of an out-of-line declaration, only require a 'template<>'
header for each enclosing class template that hasn't been previously
specialized; previously, we were requiring 'template<>' for enclosing
class templates and members of class templates that hadn't been
previously specialized. Fixes <rdar://problem/9422013>.
llvm-svn: 131207
I've edited one diagnostic which would print "copy constructor" for copy
constructors and "constructor" for any other constructor. If anyone is
extremely enamored with this, it can be reinstated with a simple boolean
flag rather than calling getSpecialMember, which is inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 131143
the semantic context referenced by the nested-name-specifier rather
than the syntactic form of the nested-name-specifier. The previous
incarnation was based on my complete misunderstanding of C++
[temp.expl.spec]. The latest C++0x working draft clarifies the
requirements here, and this rewrite is intended to follow that.
Along the way, improve source location information in the
diagnostics. For example, if we report that a specific type needs or
doesn't need a 'template<>' header, we dig out that type in the
nested-name-specifier and highlight its range.
Fixes: PR5907, PR9421, PR8277, PR8708, PR9482, PR9668, PR9877, and
<rdar://problem/9135379>.
llvm-svn: 131138
Focus is on default constructors for the time being. Currently the
exception specification and prototype are processed correctly. Codegen
might work but in all likelihood doesn't.
Note that due to an error, out-of-line defaulting of member functions is
currently impossible. It will continue to that until I muster up the
courage to admit that I secretly pray to epimetheus and that I need to
rework the way default gets from Parse -> Sema.
llvm-svn: 131115
hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() really really means it now.
Also implement a fun standards bug regarding aggregates. Doug, if you'd
like, I can un-implement that bug if you think it is truly a defect.
The bug is that non-special-member constructors are never considered
user-provided, so the following is an aggregate:
struct foo {
foo(int);
};
It's kind of bad, but the solution isn't obvious - should
struct foo {
foo (int) = delete;
};
be an aggregate or not?
Lastly, add a missing initialization to FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 131101
also consider whether any of the parameter types (as written, prior to
decay) are dependent. Fixes PR9880 and <rdar://problem/9408413>.
llvm-svn: 131099
Alexis Hunt