dyncast is just due to \r\n newline interaction w/ regexps. The remap-load.c
failure is a bit stranger (the end of the extent is on the next line), but I
don't care to investigate.
llvm-svn: 95071
side effect, this also fixes some cases on Windows where the file would end up
on a different drive, because tmpnam doesn't include the drive component. PR3837
strikes again.
llvm-svn: 95067
where callee's arguments are already in the caller's own caller's stack and
they line up perfectly. e.g.
extern int foo(int a, int b, int c);
int bar(int a, int b, int c) {
return foo(a, b, c);
}
llvm-svn: 95053
arguments. Fix a bug where incomplete explicit specializations were being
passed through as legitimate. Fix a bug where the absence of an explicit
specialization in an overload set was causing overall deduction to fail.
Fixes PR6191.
llvm-svn: 95052
This is to address a serious performance problem observed when running
'clang -fsyntax-only' on really broken source files. In one case,
repeatedly calling CorrectTypo() caused one source file to be rejected
after 2 minutes instead of 1 second.
This patch causes typo correction to take neglible time on that file
while still providing correction results for the first 20 cases. I
felt this was a reasonable number for moderately broken source files.
I don't claim this is the best solution. Comments welcome. It is
necessary for us to address this issue because it is a serious
performance problem.
llvm-svn: 95049
forgetting a ';' at the end of a struct. For something like:
class c {
}
void foo() {}
we now produce:
t.cc:3:2: error: expected ';' after class
}
^
;
instead of:
t.cc:4:1: error: cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier
void foo() {}
^
t.cc:2:7: error: 'class c' can not be defined in the result type of a function
class c {
^
GCC produces:
t.cc:4: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
t.cc:4: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘c’)
t.cc:4: error: two or more data types in declaration of ‘foo’
I *think* I got the follow set right, but if I forgot anything, we'll start
getting spurious "expected ';' after class" errors, let me know if you see
any.
llvm-svn: 95042
t.cc:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.cc:6:1: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x
^
;
t.cc:5:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95039
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
Fariborz Jahanian