Commit Graph

62 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Reid Kleckner 5bc6d0fbe4 Make -fdump-vtable-layouts print to stdout, not stderr
This makes it consistent with -fdump-record-layouts, which was moved to
outs() in r186219.  My reasoning for going with stdout is that when one
of these options is present, the layouts are really a program output,
and shouldn't be interleaved with diagnostics, which are on stderr.

Reviewers: timurrrr

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2127

llvm-svn: 194279
2013-11-08 21:28:00 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov b1347cd50a ... and actually run it
llvm-svn: 183309
2013-06-05 13:50:24 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 70b5d8406e Add a test for the breakage from r183298
llvm-svn: 183308
2013-06-05 13:49:11 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov e8d7ffd01b Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code
llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 13:12:36 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov b640dd6f43 Revert r183298 and r183300 as the former broke the virtual function lookup in libcxx __locale
llvm-svn: 183305
2013-06-05 12:24:46 +00:00
Timur Iskhodzhanov 12f1f84d12 Get rid of VTableContext::ComputeMethodVTableIndices() and VTableContext::getNumVirtualFunctionPointers(); also add some tests for the VTable indices output to make sure we don't regress
llvm-svn: 183298
2013-06-05 06:36:37 +00:00
David Blaikie 596d2cacc7 Note deleted functions when dumping vtables.
llvm-svn: 166056
2012-10-16 20:25:33 +00:00
John McCall b6c4a7ef21 For the annals of subtle but terrible bugs: fix a longstanding bug
in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases
could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared
a name and parameter signature but differed in their
cv-qualification.  The code was already trying to handle this
case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers
(which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers.
This seems like something that the API should discourage, but
I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance.

Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it.

This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with
the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously,
technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang.
Just letting you know.

llvm-svn: 153168
2012-03-21 06:57:19 +00:00
Anders Carlsson e5ec21c977 Change CollectPrimaryBases to collect the bases in the right order. Fixes one half of PR9660.
llvm-svn: 129252
2011-04-10 18:00:32 +00:00
Chris Lattner 24b89469ac 'const std::type_info*' instead of 'std::type_info const*'
llvm-svn: 113092
2010-09-05 00:17:29 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 88d292ccb8 Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions. 

The new scheme:
  - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
  the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
  function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
  dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
  to/through a virtual base class, etc.
  - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
  indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
  unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
  delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
  occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
 - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
 functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
 function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
 member functions when needed.
  - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
  ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
  them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
  vtables lazily). 

From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).

Notes:
  (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
  vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
  the larger tests from these issues.
  (2) Some diagnostics related to
  implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
  have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
  way.
  (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
  see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
  vtable.

Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.

llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-13 16:44:06 +00:00
Anders Carlsson c6db5ab8b2 Fix a bug where we would sometimes incorrectly mark an vtable function as unused.
llvm-svn: 101643
2010-04-17 17:24:33 +00:00
Anders Carlsson ea7b18298e Split adding the primary virtual base offsets out into a separate pass. This fixes a bug where we would lay out virtual bases in the wrong order.
llvm-svn: 101373
2010-04-15 16:12:58 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 7ff88f8b00 Typo.
llvm-svn: 101015
2010-04-12 05:32:01 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 3383e2ad74 Fix another bug where we wouldn't generate secondary vtables for construction vtables in some cases.
llvm-svn: 100998
2010-04-11 22:20:36 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 343a26b56d Fix a bug where we were adding too many vcall offsets in some cases.
llvm-svn: 100985
2010-04-11 20:04:11 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 7a148f7141 Fix another vbase layout bug.
llvm-svn: 100952
2010-04-10 21:35:33 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 88cf34f2b4 Fix a bug where we would add the same function twice in a vtable.
llvm-svn: 100949
2010-04-10 20:39:29 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 291279e3a6 Simplify the virtual base layout code and fix a bug where we wouldn't store the offset for a virtual base.
llvm-svn: 100940
2010-04-10 18:42:27 +00:00
Anders Carlsson eba1a60ef0 Another vtable layout fix, making us match gcc better.
llvm-svn: 99812
2010-03-29 15:08:41 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 151b062fee Don't add address points for virtual primary bases that aren't primary bases in the complete class.
llvm-svn: 99555
2010-03-25 21:45:14 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 18c582d9c8 When dumping vtables, also dump the thunks.
llvm-svn: 98799
2010-03-18 02:44:19 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 3521552ebe Add a test.
llvm-svn: 98246
2010-03-11 06:44:31 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 423406f335 Fix calculation of whether a member function needs a thunk in construction vtables.
llvm-svn: 98191
2010-03-10 21:25:37 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 115b4756b5 We were mistakenly marking morally virtual bases as being uninteresting. Fix this.
llvm-svn: 98180
2010-03-10 19:39:11 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 703a08605f Ignore non-interesting bases when emitting construction vtables.
llvm-svn: 98177
2010-03-10 19:15:26 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 45be0e069d Add newline.
llvm-svn: 98140
2010-03-10 06:51:56 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 804cf51dcf Don't accidentally mark some functions in construction vtables as unused. Also land the test for a previous checkin, now that it's correct.
llvm-svn: 98139
2010-03-10 06:51:42 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 5b0057c05b Fix a bug with base offset merging that Devang noticed.
llvm-svn: 97641
2010-03-03 04:58:02 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 7162ab947b Handle unused functions in construction vtables correctly.
llvm-svn: 97406
2010-02-28 18:37:33 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 8b37bb7c48 When laying out vtables for virtual bases in construction vtables, we need to check if the vtable is a primary base in the layout class.
llvm-svn: 97402
2010-02-28 18:08:38 +00:00
Anders Carlsson b15d8c57ad Add another construction vtable test.
llvm-svn: 97401
2010-02-28 17:59:36 +00:00
Anders Carlsson e3385f566b More improvements to construction vtables; we know handle vbase offsets correctly (I hope).
llvm-svn: 97361
2010-02-28 01:43:58 +00:00
Anders Carlsson c3f92a16f2 Add a simple construction vtable test.
llvm-svn: 97344
2010-02-27 21:09:00 +00:00
Anders Carlsson e02a926a1c Use the real base offset when calculating vbase offsets.
llvm-svn: 97338
2010-02-27 19:21:58 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 2b381bbb5c Don't add this adjustments for pure virtual member functions.
llvm-svn: 97334
2010-02-27 18:16:50 +00:00
Anders Carlsson e6528ed7c5 Add another test.
llvm-svn: 97329
2010-02-27 16:55:58 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 4068798cbc Finish up the changes to this adjustments.
llvm-svn: 97328
2010-02-27 16:52:49 +00:00
Anders Carlsson d2025417ef Fix another vtable layout bug; we weren't looking hard enough for overriden functions when determining if an overrider will ever be used.
llvm-svn: 97306
2010-02-27 06:38:03 +00:00
Anders Carlsson d69b2f93ea Handle vcall offset sharing between destructors.
llvm-svn: 97304
2010-02-27 04:12:52 +00:00
Anders Carlsson b08aaa3e10 Fix a bug where we were generating an unnecessary vtable for a virtual base that's already a primary virtual base.
llvm-svn: 97303
2010-02-27 04:05:52 +00:00
Anders Carlsson ed7d0e8be8 Fux a bug where we were trying to add overriders for non-virtual bases of virtual bases more than once.
llvm-svn: 97173
2010-02-25 22:18:35 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 0570f71255 More fixes. Don't try to emit a virtual base vtable if the virtual base in question is a primary virtual base of some other base.
llvm-svn: 96881
2010-02-23 03:48:14 +00:00
Anders Carlsson bae46277fe Always emit vcall offset for the primary base, not only if it's virtual. Remove a debug printf, and add the test case that now passes.
llvm-svn: 96880
2010-02-23 03:26:17 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 13f0f66223 Handle layout of vtables for virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 96355
2010-02-16 16:49:35 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 14157939ab Fix a bug where we would not emit secondary vtables for bases of a primary base.
llvm-svn: 96351
2010-02-16 16:02:57 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 77904f1d5b Emit vbase offsets.
llvm-svn: 96329
2010-02-16 04:59:55 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 033d48697f Don't compute final overriders or build vtables for bases that don't need a vtable.
llvm-svn: 96171
2010-02-14 17:05:59 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 258a1e35e8 Improve support for non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. With this, it should be possible to use the new vtable layout code for all class hierarchies that do not involve virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 96137
2010-02-14 00:16:19 +00:00
Anders Carlsson d3adb0ced9 Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments.
llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-13 23:40:17 +00:00