Currently FormValues are only used for attributes of DIEs and thus
uers always have a CU lying around when calling into the FormValue
API.
Accelerator tables encode their information using the same Forms
as the attributes, thus it is natural to use DWARFFormValue to
extract/dump them. There is no CU in that case though. Allow the
API to be called with a null CU arguemnt by making the RelocMap
lookup conditional on the CU pointer validity. And document this
new behvior in the header. (Test coverage for this use of the API
comes in the DwarfAccelTable support patch)
llvm-svn: 221835
expansion into a parameter pack; we know that we're still filling in that
parameter's arguments. Previously, if we hit this case for an alias template,
we'd try to substitute using non-canonical template arguments.
llvm-svn: 221832
The GOT slots were being laid out in a random order by the GOTPass which
caused randomness in the output file.
Note: With this change lld now bootstraps on darwin. That is:
1) link lld using system linker to make lld.1
2) link lld using lld.1 to make lld.2
3) link lld using lld.2 to make lld.3
Now lld.2 and lld.3 are identical.
llvm-svn: 221831
r221820 fixed a problem (PR21548) where an iPTR was used in TLI legality checks,
which isn't valid and resulted in a failed assertion.
The solution was to lower pointer types into the correct target's VT, by
using TL::getValueType instead of EVT::getEVT.
This commit changes 3 other uses of EVT::getEVT, but without any tests:
- One of these non-lowered EVTs is passed to allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses,
which goes into target's TL implementation and doesn't cause any problem (yet.)
- Two others are passed to TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom:
- one only looks at extensions, so doesn't concern pointers.
- one only looks at binary operators, so also isn't a problem.
The latter might some day be exposed to pointers and cause the same assert as
the original PR, because there's a comment hinting at also supporting cast ops.
For consistency, update all of them and be done with it.
llvm-svn: 221827
The code in {add,sub}v.i3 routines does not trap when it should, because
it performs the actual add/subtract operation in signed arithmetic,
rather than unsigned.
Patch by Francois-Xavie Coudert!
llvm-svn: 221826
On darwin in final linked images, the __TEXT segment covers that start of the
file. That means in memory a process can see the mach_header (and load commands)
for every loaded image in a process. There are APIs that take and return the
mach_header addresses as a way to specify a particular loaded image.
For completeness, any code can get the address of the mach_header of the image
it is in by using &__dso_handle. In addition there are mach-o type specific
symbols like __mh_execute_header.
The linker needs to supply a definition for any of these symbols if used. But
the address the symbol it resolves to is not in any section. Instead it is the
address of the start of the __TEXT segment.
I needed to make a small change to SimpleFileNode to not override
resetNextIndex() because the Driver creates a SimpleFileNode to hold the
internal/implicit files that the context/writer can create. For some reason
SimpleFileNode overrode resetNextIndex() to do nothing instead of reseting
the index (which mach-o needs if the internal file is an archive).
llvm-svn: 221822
Summary:
Consider the following nifty 1 liner: (0 ? csqrtl(2.0f) : sqrtl(2.0f)). One can easily obtain such code from e.g. tgmath. Right now it produces an assertion because we fail to do the promotion real => _Complex real.
The case was properly handled previously (old handleOtherComplexFloatConversion routine), but was forgotten in the current version. This seems to be about fallout from r219557
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6217
llvm-svn: 221821
This is a follow-on to r221706 and r221731 and discussed in more detail in PR21385.
This patch also loosens the testcase checking for btver2. We know that the "1.0" will be loaded, but
we can't tell exactly when, so replace the CHECK-NEXT specifiers with plain CHECKs. The CHECK-NEXT
sequence relied on a quirk of post-RA-scheduling that may change independently of anything in these tests.
llvm-svn: 221819
The check for unnamed members was intended to skip unnamed bitfields,
but it ended up skipping unnamed structs. This lead to an assertion in
IRGen.
llvm-svn: 221818
One of them (__memcpy_chk) was already there, the others were checked
by comparing function names.
Note that the fortified libfuncs are now part of TLI, but are always
available, because they aren't generated, only optimized into the
non-checking versions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6179
llvm-svn: 221817
This sends notifications for module load / unload to the process
plugin, and also manages the state more accurately during the
loading sequence.
Similar work by Virgile Bello was referenced during the
implementation of this patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6224
llvm-svn: 221807
Due to a previous multi-threaded design involving message
passing, we used message classes to pass event information
to the delegate. Since the multi-threaded design has gone
away, we simplify this by passing event arguments as direct
function parameters, which is more clear and easier to
understand.
llvm-svn: 221806
After r221575 TestCallStopAndContinue and TestCallThatRestarts started
crashing on FreeBSD with a null temporary_module_sp in
RegisterContextLLDB::InitializeNonZerothFrame().
llvm-svn: 221805
Make the handling of calls to intrinsics in CGSCC consistent:
they are not treated like regular function calls because they
are never lowered to function calls.
Without this patch, we can get dangling pointer asserts from
the subsequent loop that processes callsites because it already
ignores intrinsics.
See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21403 for more details / discussion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6124
llvm-svn: 221802
Summary:
Reapply r221772. The old patch breaks the bot because the @indvar_32_bit test
was run whether NVPTX was enabled or not.
IndVarSimplify should not widen an indvar if arithmetics on the wider
indvar are more expensive than those on the narrower indvar. For
instance, although NVPTX64 treats i64 as a legal type, an ADD on i64 is
twice as expensive as that on i32, because the hardware needs to
simulate a 64-bit integer using two 32-bit integers.
Split from D6188, and based on D6195 which adds NVPTXTargetTransformInfo.
Fixes PR21148.
Test Plan:
Added @indvar_32_bit that verifies we do not widen an indvar if the arithmetics
on the wider type are more expensive. This test is run only when NVPTX is
enabled.
Reviewers: jholewinski, eliben, meheff, atrick
Reviewed By: atrick
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6196
llvm-svn: 221799
Summary:
Large-model was added first. With the addition of support for multiple PIC
models in LLVM, now add small-model PIC for 32-bit PowerPC, SysV4 ABI. This
generates more optimal code, for shared libraries with less than about 16380
data objects.
Test Plan: Test cases added or updated
Reviewers: joerg, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jholewinski, mcrosier, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5399
llvm-svn: 221791
The addition of RegisterNumber introduced a bug where if the PC is stored in a
return address register, such as on ARM and PowerPC, this register number is
retrieved and used, but never checked in the row if it's saved. Correct this by
setting the variable that's used to the new register number.
Patch by Jason Molenda.
llvm-svn: 221790
Summary:
Taking advantage of the new 'CFAIsRegisterDereferenced' CFA register type, add
full stack unwind support to the PowerPC/PowerPC64 ABI. Also, add a new
register set for powerpc32-on-64, so the register sizes are correct. This also
requires modifying the ProcessMonitor to add support for non-uintptr_t-sized
register values.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, emaste
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6183
llvm-svn: 221789
Summary:
PowerPC handles the stack chain with the current stack pointer being a pointer
to the backchain (CFA). LLDB currently has no way of handling this, so this
adds a "CFA is dereferenced from a register" type.
Discussed with Jason Molenda, who also provided the initial patch for this.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6182
llvm-svn: 221788
Frederic Riss