Summary:
Currently, add_new_check.py assumes all checks are for C++ code.
This adds a new argument --language=[LANG] to add_new_check.py
so authors of new checks can specify that the test file should
be in a different language.
For example, authors can pass --language=objc for Objective-C
clang-tidy checks.
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: Wizard, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39141
llvm-svn: 323919
Summary:
The `getName()` call is useless. It's better to show a better example
as tutorial.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20766
llvm-svn: 271207
Summary: Without namespace you can not create checks with same name in different modules
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Cong Liu!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15571
llvm-svn: 255770
Before this check, I would get the following error:
Updating ./misc/CMakeLists.txt...
Creating ./misc/NoReinterpret_castCheck.h...
Creating ./misc/NoReinterpret_castCheck.cpp...
Updating ./misc/MiscTidyModule.cpp...
Creating ../test/clang-tidy/misc-no-reinterpret_cast.cpp...
Creating ../docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc-no-reinterpret_cast.rst...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./add_new_check.py", line 271, in <module>
main()
File "./add_new_check.py", line 267, in main
update_checks_list(module_path)
File "./add_new_check.py", line 220, in update_checks_list
os.listdir('docs/clang-tidy/checks')))
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'docs/clang-tidy/checks'
Patch by Matthias Gehre!
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13272
llvm-svn: 248997
This fixes the case where the check should be added at the end of
the list of checks in CMakeLists.txt of the corresponding module.
Before it was added after LINK_LIBS line.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12629
Patch by Marek Kurdej!
llvm-svn: 246854
Summary: Update python script, so that it doesn't print that line in new tests.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12281
llvm-svn: 245926
There are still a vast range of improvements that can be done to this,
but it seems like an ok initial version. Suggestions or patches are
highly welcome.
llvm-svn: 223766
Jonathan Coe