Port mmintrin.h which include x86 MMX intrinsics implementation to PowerPC platform (using Altivec).
To make the include process correct, PowerPC's toolchain class is overrided to insert new headers directory (named ppc_wrappers) into the path. Basic test cases for several intrinsic functions are added.
The header is mainly developed by Steven Munroe, with contributions from Paul Clarke, Bill Schmidt, Jinsong Ji and Zixuan Wu.
Reviewed By: Jinsong Ji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59924
llvm-svn: 358949
When growing a body on a body farm, it's essential to use the same redeclaration
of the function that's going to be used during analysis. Otherwise our
ParmVarDecls won't match the ones that are used to identify argument regions.
This boils down to trusting the reasoning in AnalysisDeclContext. We shouldn't
canonicalize the declaration before farming the body because it makes us not
obey the sophisticated decision-making process of AnalysisDeclContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60899
llvm-svn: 358946
Stuffing invalid source locations (such as those in functions produced by
body farms) into path diagnostics causes crashes.
Fix a typo in a nearby function name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60808
llvm-svn: 358945
Implement cplusplus.SmartPtrModeling, a new checker that doesn't
emit any warnings but models methods of smart pointers more precisely.
For now the only thing it does is make `(bool) P` return false when `P`
is a freshly moved pointer. This addresses a false positive in the
use-after-move-checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60796
llvm-svn: 358944
CWG 1691 changed the definition of the namespaces associated with a class
type or enumeration type.
For a class type, the associated namespaces are the innermost enclosing
namespaces of the associated classes. For an enumeration type, the associated
namespace is the innermost enclosing namespace of its declaration.
This also fixes CWG 1690 and CWG 1692.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60573
Reviewed By: rjmccall, rsmith
llvm-svn: 358882
The goal here is to exercise each rule in [basic.lookup.argdep] at least once.
These new tests expose what I believe are 2 issues:
1. CWG 1691 needs to be implemented (p2: [...] Its associated namespaces are
the innermost enclosing namespaces of its associated classes [...]) The
corresponding tests are adl_class_type::X2 and adl_class_type::X5.
2. The end of paragraph 2 ([...] Additionally, if the aforementioned set of
overloaded functions is named with a template-id, its associated classes
and namespaces also include those of its type template-arguments and its
template template-arguments.) is not implemented. Closely related, the
restriction on non-dependent parameter types in this same paragraph needs
to be removed. The corresponding tests are in adl_overload_set (both issues
are from CWG 997).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60570
Reviewed By: riccibruno, Quuxplusone
llvm-svn: 358881
Clang emits a warning when using a pure specifier =0 in a function definition
at class scope (a MS-specific construct), when using -fms-extensions.
However, to detect this, it was using FD->isCanonicalDecl() on function
declaration, which was also detecting out-of-class definition of member
functions of class templates. Fix this by using !FD->isOutOfLine() instead.
Fixes PR21334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29707
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Reviewers: rnk, riccibruno
Patch By: Rudy Pons
llvm-svn: 358849
Moved UninitializedObjectChecker from the 'alpha.cplusplus' to the
'optin.cplusplus' package.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58573
llvm-svn: 358797
Exposed by a related bug about visibility of default arguments of nested
templates - without the correct decl context, default template
parameters of variable templates nested in classes would have incorrect
visibility computed.
llvm-svn: 358796
The code is/was already correct for the case where a parameter is a
parameter of its enclosing lexical DeclContext (functions and classes).
But for other templates (alias and variable templates) they don't create
their own scope to be members of - in those cases, they parameter should
be considered visible if any definition of the lexical decl context is
visible.
[this should cleanup the failure on the libstdc++ modules buildbot]
[this doesn't actually fix the variable template case for a
secondary/compounding reason (its lexical decl context is incorrectly
considered to be the translation unit)]
Test covers all 4 kinds of templates with default args, including a
regression test for the still broken variable template case.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60892
llvm-svn: 358795
runtime.
target [teams distribute] simd costructs do not require full runtime for
the correct execution, we can run them without full runtime.
llvm-svn: 358766
TL;DR:
* Add checker and package options to the TableGen files
* Added a new class called CmdLineOption, and both Package and Checker recieved
a list<CmdLineOption> field.
* Added every existing checker and package option to Checkers.td.
* The CheckerRegistry class
* Received some comments to most of it's inline classes
* Received the CmdLineOption and PackageInfo inline classes, a list of
CmdLineOption was added to CheckerInfo and PackageInfo
* Added addCheckerOption and addPackageOption
* Added a new field called Packages, used in addPackageOptions, filled up in
addPackage
Detailed description:
In the last couple months, a lot of effort was put into tightening the
analyzer's command line interface. The main issue is that it's spectacularly
easy to mess up a lenghty enough invocation of the analyzer, and the user was
given no warnings or errors at all in that case.
We can divide the effort of resolving this into several chapters:
* Non-checker analyzer configurations:
Gather every analyzer configuration into a dedicated file. Emit errors for
non-existent configurations or incorrect values. Be able to list these
configurations. Tighten AnalyzerOptions interface to disallow making such
a mistake in the future.
* Fix the "Checker Naming Bug" by reimplementing checker dependencies:
When cplusplus.InnerPointer was enabled, it implicitly registered
unix.Malloc, which implicitly registered some sort of a modeling checker
from the CStringChecker family. This resulted in all of these checker
objects recieving the name "cplusplus.InnerPointer", making AnalyzerOptions
asking for the wrong checker options from the command line:
cplusplus.InnerPointer:Optimisic
istead of
unix.Malloc:Optimistic.
This was resolved by making CheckerRegistry responsible for checker
dependency handling, instead of checkers themselves.
* Checker options: (this patch included!)
Same as the first item, but for checkers.
(+ minor fixes here and there, and everything else that is yet to come)
There were several issues regarding checker options, that non-checker
configurations didn't suffer from: checker plugins are loaded runtime, and they
could add new checkers and new options, meaning that unlike for non-checker
configurations, we can't collect every checker option purely by generating code.
Also, as seen from the "Checker Naming Bug" issue raised above, they are very
rarely used in practice, and all sorts of skeletons fell out of the closet while
working on this project.
They were extremely problematic for users as well, purely because of how long
they were. Consider the following monster of a checker option:
alpha.cplusplus.UninitializedObject:CheckPointeeInitialization=false
While we were able to verify whether the checker itself (the part before the
colon) existed, any errors past that point were unreported, easily resulting
in 7+ hours of analyses going to waste.
This patch, similarly to how dependencies were reimplemented, uses TableGen to
register checker options into Checkers.td, so that Checkers.inc now contains
entries for both checker and package options. Using the preprocessor,
Checkers.inc is converted into code in CheckerRegistry, adding every builtin
(checkers and packages that have an entry in the Checkers.td file) checker and
package option to the registry. The new addPackageOption and addCheckerOption
functions expose the same functionality to statically-linked non-builtin and
plugin checkers and packages as well.
Emitting errors for incorrect user input, being able to list these options, and
some other functionalies will land in later patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57855
llvm-svn: 358752
Ideally, there is no reason behind not being able to depend on checkers that
come from a different plugin (or on builtin checkers) -- however, this is only
possible if all checkers are added to the registry before resolving checker
dependencies. Since I used a binary search in my addDependency method, this also
resulted in an assertion failure (due to CheckerRegistry::Checkers not being
sorted), since the function used by plugins to register their checkers
(clang_registerCheckers) calls addDependency.
This patch resolves this issue by only noting which dependencies have to
established when addDependency is called, and resolves them at a later stage
when no more checkers are added to the registry, by which point
CheckerRegistry::Checkers is already sorted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59461
llvm-svn: 358750
Default RegionStore bindings represent values that can be obtained by loading
from anywhere within the region, not just the specific offset within the region
that they are said to be bound to. For example, default-binding a character \0
to an int (eg., via memset()) means that the whole int is 0, not just
that its lower byte is 0.
Even though memset and bzero were modeled this way, it didn't work correctly
when applied to simple variables. Eg., in
int x;
memset(x, 0, sizeof(x));
we did produce a default binding, but were unable to read it later, and 'x'
was perceived as an uninitialized variable even after memset.
At the same time, if we replace 'x' with a variable of a structure or array
type, accessing fields or elements of such variable was working correctly,
which was enough for most cases. So this was only a problem for variables of
simple integer/enumeration/floating-point/pointer types.
Fix loading default bindings from RegionStore for regions of simple variables.
Add a unit test to document the API contract as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60742
llvm-svn: 358722
Summary: The requires directive containing target related clauses must appear before any target region in the compilation unit.
Reviewers: ABataev, AlexEichenberger, caomhin
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60875
llvm-svn: 358709
global module fragment.
We know that the declaration in question should have been introduced by
a '#include', so try to figure out which one and suggest it. Don't
suggest importing the global module fragment itself!
llvm-svn: 358631
retaining block and all of the enclosing blocks are non-escaping.
If the block implicitly retaining self doesn't escape, there is no risk
of creating retain cycles, so clang shouldn't diagnose it and force
users to add self-> to silence the diagnostic.
Also, fix a bug where clang was failing to diagnose an implicitly
retained self inside a c++ lambda nested inside a block.
rdar://problem/25059955
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60736
llvm-svn: 358624
For the following code snippet:
void builtin_function_call_crash_fixes(char *c) {
__builtin_strncpy(c, "", 6);
__builtin_memset(c, '\0', (0));
__builtin_memcpy(c, c, 0);
}
security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling caused a regression, as it
didn't recognize functions starting with __builtin_. Fixed exactly that.
I wanted to modify an existing test file, but the two I found didn't seem like
perfect candidates. While I was there, I prettified their RUN: lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59812
llvm-svn: 358609
All target-parallel-based constructs can be run in SPMD mode from now
on. Even if num_threads clauses or if clauses are used, such constructs
can be executed in SPMD mode.
llvm-svn: 358595
Summary:
When -gsplit-dwarf is used together with other -g options, in most cases
the computed debug info level is decided by the last -g option, with one
special case (see below). This patch drops that special case and thus
makes it easy to reason about:
// If a lower debug level -g comes after -gsplit-dwarf, in some cases
// -gsplit-dwarf is cancelled.
-gsplit-dwarf -g0 => 0
-gsplit-dwarf -gline-directives-only => DebugDirectivesOnly
-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 1
-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 + split
// If -gsplit-dwarf comes after -g options, with this patch, the net
// effect is 2 + split for all combinations
-g0 -gsplit-dwarf => 2 + split
-gline-directives-only -gsplit-dwarf => 2 + split
-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 2 + split
-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 + split (before) 2 + split (after)
The last case has been changed. In general, if the user intends to lower
debug info level, place that -g option after -gsplit-dwarf.
Some context:
In gcc, the last of -gsplit-dwarf -g0 -g1 -g2 -g3 -ggdb[0-3] -gdwarf-*
... decides the debug info level (-gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-* have level 2).
It is a bit unfortunate that -gsplit-dwarf -gdwarf-* ... participate in
the level computation but that is the status quo.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, probinson
Reviewed By: dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: probinson, aprantl, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59923
llvm-svn: 358544
The FIXME of this test case has been addressed in r335084/r338800. Its
execution still does not succeed because of multiple syntax errors.
First, the "clang" namespace is missing on each of the 4 pragmas.
Second, the pragma for defining the vector width is "vectorize_width(4)"
instead of "vectorize(4)". Third, the pragma for defining the interleave
factor is "interleave_count(8)" instead of "interleave(8)".
The file was already using the wrong syntax when added in
r210925 2014-06-13. The file ast-print-pragmas.cpp already checks for
the correct pragma order, making this test redundant even if fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60749
llvm-svn: 358507
Combined constructs with parallel and if clauses without modifiers may
be executed in SPMD mode since if the condition is true for the target
region, it is also true for parallel region and the threads must be run
in parallel.
llvm-svn: 358503
The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
LLDB can't currently handle Clang's default (limit/no-standalone) DWARF,
so platforms that default to LLDB (Darwin) or anyone else manually
requesting LLDB tuning, should also get standalone DWARF.
That doesn't mean a user can't explicitly enable (because they have
other reasons to prefer standalone DWARF (such as that they're only
building half their application with debug info enabled, and half
without - or because they're tuning for GDB, but want to be able to use
it under LLDB too (this is the default on FreeBSD))) or disable (testing
LLDB fixes/improvements that handle no-standalone mode, building C code,
perhaps, which wouldn't have the LLDB<>no-standalone conflict, etc) the
feature regardless of the tuning.
llvm-svn: 358464
mode.
After the previous patch with the more correct handling of the number of
threads in parallel regions, the parallel regions with num_threads
clauses can be executed in SPMD mode.
llvm-svn: 358445
This reverts r358409, which I think broke the bots in compiler-rt.
Since I'm having trouble reproducing the failure, I'm reverting this
until I can investigate locally.
llvm-svn: 358437
I plan to use this as the basis for backend IR test cases. We currently crash hard for using 32 or 64 bit mask registers without avx512bw.
llvm-svn: 358435
The pattern we replaced these with may be too hard to match as demonstrated by
PR41496 and PR41316.
This patch restores the intrinsics and then we can start focusing
on the optimizing the intrinsics.
I've mostly reverted the original patch that removed them. Though I modified
the avx512 intrinsics to not have masking built in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60674
llvm-svn: 358427
Summary:
In r350649, I changed aligned allocation from being available starting
in macosx10.13 to macosx10.14. However, aligned allocation is indeed
available starting with macosx10.13, my investigation had been based
on the wrong libc++abi dylib.
This means that Clang before the fix will be more stringent when it
comes to aligned allocation -- it will not allow it when back-deploying
to macosx 10.13, when it would actually be safe to do so.
Note that a companion change will be coming to fix the libc++ tests.
Reviewers: ahatanak
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60626
llvm-svn: 358409
and the global and private module fragment.
For now, the private module fragment introducer is ignored, but use of
the global module fragment introducer should be properly enforced.
llvm-svn: 358353
A marker (matching /#[A-Za-z0-9_-]/) is specified by attaching a comment
containing the marker to the line at which the diagnostic is expected,
and then can be referenced from an expected-* directive after an @:
foo // #1
// expected-error@#1 {{undeclared identifier 'foo'}}
The intent is for markers to be used in situations where relative line
numbers are currently used, to avoid the need to renumber when the test
case is rearranged.
llvm-svn: 358326
Writing stuff into an argument variable is usually equivalent to writing stuff
to a local variable: it will have no effect outside of the function.
There's an important exception from this rule: if the argument variable has
a non-trivial destructor, the destructor would be invoked on
the parent stack frame, exposing contents of the otherwise dead
argument variable to the caller.
If such argument is the last place where a pointer is stored before the function
exits and the function is the one we've started our analysis from (i.e., we have
no caller context for it), we currently diagnose a leak. This is incorrect
because the destructor of the argument still has access to the pointer.
The destructor may deallocate the pointer or even pass it further.
Treat writes into such argument regions as "escapes" instead, suppressing
spurious memory leak reports but not messing with dead symbol removal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60112
llvm-svn: 358321
Fangrui Song