Introduce the following -fsanitize-recover flags:
- -fsanitize-recover=<list>: Enable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks. It is forbidden to explicitly list unrecoverable
sanitizers here (that is, "address", "unreachable", "return").
- -fno-sanitize-recover=<list>: Disable recovery for selected checks or
group of checks.
- -f(no-)?sanitize-recover is now a synonym for
-f(no-)?sanitize-recover=undefined,integer and will soon be deprecated.
These flags are parsed left to right, and mask of "recoverable"
sanitizer is updated accordingly, much like what we do for -fsanitize= flags.
-fsanitize= and -fsanitize-recover= flag families are independent.
CodeGen change: If there is a single UBSan handler function, responsible
for implementing multiple checks, which have different recoverable setting,
then we emit two handler calls instead of one:
the first one for the set of "unrecoverable" checks, another one - for
set of "recoverable" checks. If all checks implemented by a handler have the
same recoverability setting, then the generated code will be the same.
llvm-svn: 225719
I'd be interested if the paragraph on Parse not knowing much about AST is
something folks agree with. I think this used to be true after rjmccall removed
the Action interface in r112244 and I believe it's still true, but I'm not sure.
(For example, ParseOpenMP.cpp does include AST/StmtOpenMP.h. Other than that,
Parse not using AST nodes much seems to be still true, though.)
llvm-svn: 224894
With alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
Without alignment:
int aaaaaa = aa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
* cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
This fixes llvm.org/PR21666.
llvm-svn: 223117
Change to original: ifndef out tests in Windows due to /-separated
paths.
Summary:
Often one is only interested in matches within the main-file or matches
that are not within a system-header, for which this patch adds
isInMainFile and isInSystemFile. They take no arguments and narrow down
the matches.
The isInFileMatchingName is mainly thought for interactive
clang-query-sessions, to make a matcher more specific without restarting
the session with the files you are interested in for that moment. It
takes a string that will be used as regular-expression to match the
filename of where the matched node is expanded.
Patch by Hendrik von Prince.
llvm-svn: 222765
Rethrowing exceptions in the MS model is very simple: just call
_CxxThrowException with nullptr for both arguments.
N.B. They chose stdcall as the calling convention for x86 but cdecl for
all other platforms.
llvm-svn: 222733
Summary:
Often one is only interested in matches within the main-file or matches
that are not within a system-header, for which this patch adds
isInMainFile and isInSystemFile. They take no arguments and narrow down
the matches.
The isInFileMatchingName is mainly thought for interactive
clang-query-sessions, to make a matcher more specific without restarting
the session with the files you are interested in for that moment. It
takes a string that will be used as regular-expression to match the
filename of where the matched node is expanded.
Patch by Hendrik von Prince.
llvm-svn: 222646
Improve the documentation for vim integration of clang-format. Prefer the use
of <c-o> to do the normal mode command execution to avoid side-effects of the
escape and re-insertion (cursor movement). Tweak the macros to use a double
return to avoid having to manually return control to the editor from the
subprocess.
llvm-svn: 220685
This allows a module to specify that it logically contains a file, but that
said file is non-modular and intended for textual inclusion. This allows
layering checks to work properly in the presence of such files.
llvm-svn: 220448
This is long-since overdue, and matches GCC 5.0. This should also be
backwards-compatible, because we already supported all of C11 as an extension
in C99 mode.
llvm-svn: 220244
#include_next interacts poorly with modules: it depends on where in the list of
include paths the current file was found. Files covered by module maps are not
found in include search paths when building the module (and are not found in
include search paths when @importing the module either), so this isn't really
meaningful. Instead, we fake up the result that #include_next *should* have
given: find the first path that would have resulted in the given file being
picked, and search from there onwards.
llvm-svn: 220177
This commit changes the way we blacklist global variables in ASan.
Now the global is excluded from instrumentation (either regular
bounds checking, or initialization-order checking) if:
1) Global is explicitly blacklisted by its mangled name.
This part is left unchanged.
2) SourceLocation of a global is in blacklisted source file.
This changes the old behavior, where instead of looking at the
SourceLocation of a variable we simply considered llvm::Module
identifier. This was wrong, as identifier may not correspond to
the file name, and we incorrectly disabled instrumentation
for globals coming from #include'd files.
3) Global is blacklisted by type.
Now we build the type of a global variable using Clang machinery
(QualType::getAsString()), instead of llvm::StructType::getName().
After this commit, the active users of ASan blacklist files
may have to revisit them (this is a backwards-incompatible change).
llvm-svn: 220097
Adds a Clang-specific implementation of C11's stdatomic.h header. On systems,
such as FreeBSD, where a stdatomic.h header is already provided, we defer to
that header instead (using our __has_include_next technology). Otherwise, we
provide an implementation in terms of our __c11_atomic_* intrinsics (that were
created for this purpose).
C11 7.1.4p1 requires function declarations for atomic_thread_fence,
atomic_signal_fence, atomic_flag_test_and_set,
atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit, and atomic_flag_clear, and requires that
they have external linkage. Accordingly, we provide these declarations, but if
a user elides the shadowing macros and uses them, then they must have a libc
(or similar) that actually provides definitions.
atomic_flag is implemented using _Bool as the underlying type. This is
consistent with the implementation provided by FreeBSD and also GCC 4.9 (at
least when __GCC_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL == 1).
Patch by Richard Smith (rebased and slightly edited by me -- Richard said I
should drive at this point).
llvm-svn: 218957
being on by default. -fno-cxx-modules can still be used to enable C modules but
not C++ modules, but C++ modules is not significantly less stable than C
modules any more.
Also remove some of the scare words from the modules documentation. We're
certainly not going to remove modules support (though we might change the
interface), and it works well enough to bootstrap and build lots of
non-trivial code.
Note that this does not represent a commitment to the current interface nor
implementation, and we still intend to follow whatever direction the C and C++
committees take regarding modules support.
llvm-svn: 218717
The attribute documentation now conforms to Aaron Ballman's renaming of the
thread safety attributes, as well as the new paper that is due to be published
in the conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM 2014) later
this week. In addition, recent changes to the analysis, such as checking
of references and negative capabilities, are now documented.
llvm-svn: 218420
The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default.
Building with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still
shows the warning.
The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that was
emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and detecting
clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior than just giving
the compiler a good default for this warning.
Also move the cxx98compat version of this warning to CXX98CompatPedantic, and
update tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 218008
Evgeniy Stepanov