Move the creation of CapturedStmt parameters out of CodeGen and into
Sema, making it easier to customize the outlined function. The
ImplicitParamDecls are stored in the CapturedDecl using an
ASTContext-allocated array.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D722
llvm-svn: 181043
Add a CapturedStmt.h similar to Lambda.h to reduce the typing required to get
to the CapturedRegionKind enum. This also allows codegen to access this enum
without including Sema/ScopeInfo.h.
Also removes some duplicated code for capturing 'this' between CapturedStmt and
Lambda.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D712
llvm-svn: 180710
Add CapturedDecl to be the DeclContext for CapturedStmt, and perform semantic
analysis. Currently captures all variables by reference.
TODO: templates
Author: Ben Langmuir <ben.langmuir@intel.com>
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D433
llvm-svn: 179618
fact be defined and used in another TU.
Reshuffle some test cases because we suppress -Wunused-variable after we've
emitted an error.
This fixes PR15558.
llvm-svn: 179138
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
This created 2 issues:
1) Performance issue, since typo-correction with PCH/modules is rather expensive.
2) Correctness issue, since if it managed to "correct" 'super' then bogus compiler errors would
be emitted, like this:
3.m:8:3: error: unknown type name 'super'; did you mean 'super1'?
super.x = 0;
^~~~~
super1
t3.m:5:13: note: 'super1' declared here
typedef int super1;
^
t3.m:8:8: error: expected identifier or '('
super.x = 0;
^
llvm-svn: 177126
Before this patch we would compute the linkage lazily and cache it. When the
AST was modified in ways that could change the value, we would invalidate the
cache.
That was fairly brittle, since any code could ask for the a linkage before
the correct value was available.
We should change the API to one where the linkage is computed explicitly and
trying to get it when it is not available asserts.
This patch is a first step in that direction. We still compute the linkage
lazily, but instead of invalidating a cache, we assert that the AST
modifications didn't change the result.
llvm-svn: 176999
for the data specific to a macro definition (e.g. what the tokens are), and
MacroDirective class which encapsulates the changes to the "macro namespace"
(e.g. the location where the macro name became active, the location where it was undefined, etc.)
(A MacroDirective always points to a MacroInfo object.)
Usually a macro definition (MacroInfo) is where a macro name becomes active (MacroDirective) but
splitting the concepts allows us to better model the effect of modules to the macro namespace
(also as a bonus it allows better modeling of push_macro/pop_macro #pragmas).
Modules can have their own macro history, separate from the local (current translation unit)
macro history; MacroDirectives will be used to model the macro history (changes to macro namespace).
For example, if "@import A;" imports macro FOO, there will be a new local MacroDirective created
to indicate that "FOO" became active at the import location. Module "A" itself will contain another
MacroDirective in its macro history (at the point of the definition of FOO) and both MacroDirectives
will point to the same MacroInfo object.
Introducing the separation of macro concepts is the first part towards better modeling of module macros.
llvm-svn: 175585
never key functions. We did not implement that rule for the
iOS ABI, which was driven by what was implemented in gcc-4.2.
However, implement it now for other ARM-based platforms.
llvm-svn: 173515
In the source
static void f();
static void f();
template<typename T>
static void g() {
f();
}
static void f() {
}
void h() {
g<int>();
}
the call to f refers to the second decl, but it is only marked used at the end
of the translation unit during instantiation, after the third f decl has been
linked in.
With this patch we mark all subsequent decls used, so that it is easy to check
if a symbol is used or not.
llvm-svn: 171888
This fixes pr14736. It is fairly ugly, but I don't think we can do much better
as we have to wait at least until the end of the typedef to know if the
function will have external linkage or not.
llvm-svn: 171240
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
defined without a previous declaration. This is similar to
-Wmissing-prototypes, but for variables instead of functions.
Patch by Ed Schouten.
llvm-svn: 166498
The infrastructure for -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak got a little too heavy
to leave sitting at the top of Sema.cpp.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164856
Like properties, loading from a weak ivar twice in the same function can
give you inconsistent results if the object is deallocated between the
two loads. It is safer to assign to a strong local variable and use that.
Second half of <rdar://problem/12280249>.
llvm-svn: 164855
The motivating example:
if (self.weakProp)
use(self.weakProp);
As with any non-atomic test-then-use, it is possible a weak property to be
non-nil at the 'if', but be deallocated by the time it is used. The correct
way to write this example is as follows:
id tmp = self.weakProp;
if (tmp)
use(tmp);
The warning is controlled by -Warc-repeated-use-of-receiver, and uses the
property name and base to determine if the same property on the same object
is being accessed multiple times. In cases where the base is more
complicated than just a single Decl (e.g. 'foo.bar.weakProp'), it picks a
Decl for some degree of uniquing and reports the problem under a subflag,
-Warc-maybe-repeated-use-of-receiver. This gives a way to tune the
aggressiveness of the warning for a particular project.
The warning is not on by default because it is not flow-sensitive and thus
may have a higher-than-acceptable rate of false positives, though it is
less noisy than -Wreceiver-is-weak. On the other hand, it will not warn
about some cases that may be legitimate issues that -Wreceiver-is-weak
will catch, and it does not attempt to reason about methods returning weak
values.
Even though this is not a real "analysis-based" check I've put the bug
emission code in AnalysisBasedWarnings for two reasons: (1) to run on
every kind of code body (function, method, block, or lambda), and (2) to
suggest that it may be enhanced by flow-sensitive analysis in the future.
The second (smaller) half of this work is to extend it to weak locals
and weak ivars. This should use most of the same infrastructure.
Part of <rdar://problem/12280249>
llvm-svn: 164854
function being instantiated. An error recovery codepath was recursively
performing name lookup (and triggering an unbounded stack of template
instantiations which blew out the stack before hitting the depth limit).
Patch by Wei Pan!
llvm-svn: 164586
passing -fretain-comments-from-system-headers. By default, the
compiler no longer parses such documentation comments, as they
can result in a noticeable compile time/PCH slowdown.
Fixes <rdar://problem/11860820>.
llvm-svn: 163778
* Retain comments in the AST
* Serialize/deserialize comments
* Find comments attached to a certain Decl
* Expose raw comment text and SourceRange via libclang
llvm-svn: 158771
Richard Smith