It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18901
llvm-svn: 266253
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18902
llvm-svn: 266252
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19007
llvm-svn: 266251
Summary:
When we are spilling SGPRs to scratch memory, we usually don't have
free SGPRs to do the address calculation, so we need to re-use the
ScratchOffset register for the calculation.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18917
llvm-svn: 266244
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17850
This patch implements the following instructions:
cmprb, cmpeqb, cnttzw, cnttzw., cnttzd, cnttzd.
llvm-svn: 266228
Disable LDP/STP for quads on Exynos M1 as they are not as efficient as pairs
of regular LDR/STR.
Patch by Abderrazek Zaafrani <a.zaafrani@samsung.com>.
llvm-svn: 266223
Tests added along with implemented feature.
Note that there is a small leftover of unecessary MI sheduling issue
(more info in the review). CodeGen/AMDGPU/salu-to-valu.ll updated to fix
the false regression.
TODO: Support for TTMP quads, comma-separated syntax in "[]" and more.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17825
llvm-svn: 266205
Summary:
This is a special case for MIPS64 because the architecture requires
properly 32-bit sign-extended values in the register containers.
Additionaly, we merge consecutive trunc + AssertZExt nodes in order
to avoid unnecessary sign-extensions when the extension comes from a
type smaller than i32.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: dsanders, sdardis, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18893
llvm-svn: 266203
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17137
This patch was reverted after the revertion of dependant patch http://reviews.llvm.org/D17068.
There was the problem with test-suite failure.
The problem is hopefully solved with dependant patch so this patch is commited again.
llvm-svn: 266179
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17068
This changes contains fix for failing test-suite. So, this patch should hopefully work now.
llvm-svn: 266171
Summary:
It seems like this was broken in r252327. I thought we had test cases
for this, but it's really hard to tirgger spills of this exact register
size since they aren't used very much.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: nhaehnle, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19021
llvm-svn: 266152
This fixes two use-after-frees in selectLEA64_32Addr. If matchAddress
matches an ADD with an AND as an operand, and that AND hits one of the
"heroic transforms" that folds masks and shifts, we end up with N
pointing to an SDNode that was deleted. Make sure we're done accessing
it before that.
Found by ASan with the recycling allocator changes in llvm.org/PR26808.
llvm-svn: 266130
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_DWORD[_X2,X3,X4] and mostly behave like
llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format. They will be used by Mesa for SSBO and
atomic counters at least when robust buffer access behavior is desired.
(These instructions perform no format conversion and do buffer range checking
per component.)
As a side effect of sharing patterns with llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format,
it has become trivial to add support for the f32 and v2f32 variants of that
intrinsic, so the patch does so.
Also DAG-ify (and fix) some tests that I noticed intermittent failures in
while developing this patch.
Some tests were (temporarily) adjusted for the required mayLoad/hasSideEffects
changes to the BUFFER_STORE_DWORD* instructions. See also
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18291.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18292
llvm-svn: 266126
(Recommit of r266002, with r266011, r266016, and not accidentally
including an extra unused/uninitialized element in LibcallRoutineNames)
AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw, and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.
This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.
Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.
This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.
It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.
At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200
llvm-svn: 266115
Summary:
We will be able to handle this case much better once the hazard recognizer
is finished, but this conservative implementation fixes a hang with the piglit
test:
spec/arb_arrays_of_arrays/execution/sampler/fs-nested-struct-arrays-nonconst-nested-arra
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18988
llvm-svn: 266105
This helps clean up some of the mess when expanding unaligned 64-bit
loads when changed to be promote to v2i32, and fixes situations
where or x, 0 was emitted after splitting 64-bit ors during moveToVALU.
I think this could be a generic combine but I'm not sure.
llvm-svn: 266104
Summary:
Under certain circumstances, multi-level breaks (or what is understood by
the control flow passes as such) could be miscompiled in a way that causes
infinite loops, by emitting incorrect control flow intrinsics.
This fixes a hang in
dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.loops.while_dynamic_iterations.conditional_continue_vertex
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18967
llvm-svn: 266088
This patch enables assembler support for .set arch=octeon.
It will fix issues with inline assembler when this directive is used.
Patch by Strahinja Petrovic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18548
llvm-svn: 266081
They broke the msan bot.
Original message:
Add __atomic_* lowering to AtomicExpandPass.
AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw,and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.
This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.
Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.
This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.
It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.
At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200
llvm-svn: 266062
On z13, if eliminateFrameIndex() chooses LE (and not LEY), immediately
transform that LE to LDE32 to avoid partial register dependencies.
LEY should be generally preferred for big offsets over an expansion
into LAY + LDE32.
Reviewed by Ulrich Weigand.
llvm-svn: 266060
Summary:
Alias 'jic $reg, 0' to 'jrc $reg' and 'jialc $reg, 0' to 'jalrc $reg' like
binutils.
Reviewers: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18856
llvm-svn: 266055
Resolve Bug 27046 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27046).
The PPCInstrInfo::optimizeCompareInstr function could create a new use of
CR0, even if CR0 were previously dead. This patch marks CR0 live if a use of
CR0 is created.
Author: Tom Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: hfinkel kbarton cycheng
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18884
llvm-svn: 266040
In the ELFv2 ABI, we are not required to save all CR fields. If only one
nonvolatile CR field is clobbered, use mfocrf instead of mfcr to
selectively save the field, because mfocrf has short latency compares to
mfcr.
Thanks Nemanja's invaluable hint!
Reviewers: nemanjai tjablin hfinkel kbarton
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17749
llvm-svn: 266038
This is better for a few reasons:
+ It matches the other tooling for iOS.
+ It matches EABI in more cases (i.e. Thumb-mode, and in practice we don't
use ARM mode).
+ It leads to infinitesimally smaller code (0.2%, yay!).
rdar://25369506
llvm-svn: 266003
AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw, and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.
This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.
Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.
This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.
It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.
At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200
llvm-svn: 266002
This change follows up defaults for GCC and Clang, so LLVM does not differ
from them. While number of the test files are touched with this change, they
all keep the old (expected) behaviour with the explicit option:
"-relocation-model=pic"
The tests that have not been touched are insensitive to relocation model.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17995
llvm-svn: 265949
The note about conditional returns can now be removed, as they are
implemented. Let's also add 2 new ones in exchange.
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18962
llvm-svn: 265944
When we see a .arch or .cpu directive, we should try to avoid switching
ARM/Thumb mode if possible.
If we do have to switch modes, we also need to emit the correct mapping
symbol for the new ISA. We did not do this previously, so could emit
ARM code with Thumb mapping symbols (or vice-versa).
The GAS behaviour is to always stay in the same mode, and to emit an
error on any instructions seen when the current mode is not available on
the current target. We can't represent that situation easily (we assume
that Thumb mode is available if ModeThumb is set), so we differ from the
GAS behaviour when switching to a target that can't support the old
mode. I've added a warning for when this implicit mode-switch occurs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18955
llvm-svn: 265936
This adds a conditional variant of CallBR instruction, CallBCR. Also,
it can be fused with integer comparisons, resulting in one of the new
C*BCall instructions.
In addition to CallBRCL limitations, this has another one: it won't
trigger if the function to call isn't already in %r1 - see f22 in the
test for an example (it's also why the loads in tests are volatile).
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18928
llvm-svn: 265933
These are fused compare-and-branches, so they obviously don't use CC.
Author: koriakin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18927
llvm-svn: 265932
Restrict the max length of long nops for Lakemont to 7. Experiments on MCU
benchmarks (Dhrystone, Coremark) show that this is the most optimal length.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18897
llvm-svn: 265924
Extend the existing lowering of vXi8 multiplies to support v64i8 on avx512bw targets.
I added the Lower512IntArith helper function to help with this - not sure how often this could be used in the future, but it seemed better than putting all that logic inside LowerMUL.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18937
llvm-svn: 265902
Matthias Braun