Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
This is a heuristic to make up for the fact that the analyzer doesn't
model C++ containers very well. One example is modeling that
'std::distance(I, E) == 0' implies 'I == E'. In the future, it would be
nice to model this explicitly, but for now it just results in a lot of
false positives.
The actual heuristic checks if the base type has a member named 'begin' or
'iterator'. If so, we treat the constructors and destructors of that type
as opaque, rather than inlining them.
This is intended to drastically reduce the number of false positives
reported with experimental destructor support turned on. We can tweak the
heuristic in the future, but we'd rather err on the side of false negatives
for now.
<rdar://problem/13497258>
llvm-svn: 178516
This is controlled by the 'suppress-c++-stdlib' analyzer-config flag.
It is currently off by default.
This is more suppression than we'd like to do, since obviously there can
be user-caused issues within 'std', but it gives us the option to wield
a large hammer to suppress false positives the user likely can't work
around.
llvm-svn: 178513
Evaluating a C++ new expression now includes generating an intermediate
ExplodedNode, and this node could very well represent a previously-
reachable state in the ExplodedGraph. If so, we can short-circuit the
rest of the evaluation.
Caught by the assertion a few lines later.
<rdar://problem/13510065>
llvm-svn: 178401
We can check if the receiver is nil in the node that corresponds to the StmtPoint of the message send.
At that point, the receiver is guaranteed to be live. We will find at least one unreclaimed node due to
my previous commit (look for StmtPoint instead of PostStmt) and the fact that the nil receiver nodes are tagged.
+ a couple of extra tests.
llvm-svn: 178381
Add a new callback that notifies checkers when a const pointer escapes. Currently, this only works
for const pointers passed as a top level parameter into a function. We need to differentiate the const
pointers escape from regular escape since the content pointed by const pointer will not change;
if it’s a file handle, a file cannot be closed; but delete is allowed on const pointers.
This should suppress several false positives reported by the NewDelete checker on llvm codebase.
llvm-svn: 178310
We should only suppress a bug report if the IDCed or null returned nil value is directly related to the value we are warning about. This was
not the case for nil receivers - we would suppress a bug report that had an IDCed nil receiver on the path regardless of how it’s
related to the warning.
1) Thread EnableNullFPSuppression parameter through the visitors to differentiate between tracking the value which
is directly responsible for the bug and other values that visitors are tracking (ex: general tracking of nil receivers).
2) in trackNullOrUndef specifically address the case when a value of the message send is nil due to the receiver being nil.
llvm-svn: 178309
+ Improved display names for allocators and deallocators
The checker checks if a deallocation function matches allocation one. ('free' for 'malloc', 'delete' for 'new' etc.)
llvm-svn: 178250
These types will not have a CXXConstructExpr to do the initialization for
them. Previously we just used a simple call to ProgramState::bindLoc, but
that doesn't trigger proper checker callbacks (like pointer escape).
Found by Anton Yartsev.
llvm-svn: 178160
Previously all unimplemented methods for a class were grouped under
a single warning, with all the unimplemented methods mentioned
as notes. Based on feedback from users, most users would like
a separate warning for each method, with a note pointing back to
the original method declaration.
Implements <rdar://problem/13350414>
llvm-svn: 178097
Register the nil tracking visitors with the region and refactor trackNullOrUndefValue a bit.
Also adds the cast and paren stripping before checking if the value is an OpaqueValueExpr
or ExprWithCleanups.
llvm-svn: 178093
This addresses an undefined value false positive from concreteOffsetBindingIsInvalidatedBySymbolicOffsetAssignment.
Fixes PR14877; radar://12991168.
llvm-svn: 177905
These aren't generated by default, but they are needed when either side of
the comparison is tainted.
Should fix our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 177846
In C, comparisons between signed and unsigned numbers are always done in
unsigned-space. Thus, we should know that "i >= 0U" is always true, even
if 'i' is signed. Similarly, "u >= 0" is also always true, even though '0'
is signed.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003> (false positives related to std::vector)
llvm-svn: 177806
We can support the full range of comparison operations between two locations
by canonicalizing them as subtraction, as in the previous commit.
This won't work (well) if either location includes an offset, or (again)
if the comparisons are not consistent about which region comes first.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177803
Canonicalizing these two forms allows us to better model containers like
std::vector, which use "m_start != m_finish" to implement empty() but
"m_finish - m_start" to implement size(). The analyzer should have a
consistent interpretation of these two symbolic expressions, even though
it's not properly reasoning about either one yet.
The other unfortunate thing is that while the size() expression will only
ever be written "m_finish - m_start", the comparison may be written
"m_finish == m_start" or "m_start == m_finish". Right now the analyzer does
not attempt to canonicalize those two expressions, since it doesn't know
which length expression to pick. Doing this correctly will probably require
implementing unary minus as a new SymExpr kind (<rdar://problem/12351075>).
For now, the analyzer inverts the order of arguments in the comparison to
build the subtraction, on the assumption that "begin() != end()" is
written more often than "end() != begin()". This is purely speculation.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177801
We just treat this as opaque symbols, but even that allows us to handle
simple cases where the same condition is tested twice. This is very common
in the STL, which means that any project using the STL gets spurious errors.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003>.
llvm-svn: 177800
This fixes some mistaken condition logic in RegionStore that caused
global variables to be invalidated when /any/ region was invalidated,
rather than only as part of opaque function calls. This was only
being used by CStringChecker, and so users will now see that strcpy()
and friends do not invalidate global variables.
Also, add a test case we don't handle properly: explicitly-assigned
global variables aren't being invalidated by opaque calls. This is
being tracked by <rdar://problem/13464044>.
llvm-svn: 177572
Due to improper modelling of copy constructors (specifically, their
const reference arguments), we were producing spurious leak warnings
for allocated memory stored in structs. In order to silence this, we
decided to consider storing into a struct to be the same as escaping.
However, the previous commit has fixed this issue and we can now properly
distinguish leaked memory that happens to be in a struct from a buffer
that escapes within a struct wrapper.
Originally applied in r161511, reverted in r174468.
<rdar://problem/12945937>
llvm-svn: 177571
In this case, the value of 'x' may be changed after the call to indirectAccess:
struct Wrapper {
int *ptr;
};
void indirectAccess(const Wrapper &w);
void test() {
int x = 42;
Wrapper w = { x };
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // TRUE
indirectAccess(w);
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // UNKNOWN
}
This is important for modelling return-by-value objects in C++, to show
that the contents of the struct are escaping in the return copy-constructor.
<rdar://problem/13239826>
llvm-svn: 177570
A floating-point version is nice for testing unknown values, but it's
good to be able to check all parts of the structure as well.
Test change only, no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 177455
This fixes a crash when analyzing LLVM that was exposed by r177220 (modeling of
trivial copy/move assignment operators).
When we look up a lazy binding for “Builder”, we see the direct binding of Loc at offset 0.
Previously, we believed the binding, which led to a crash. Now, we do not believe it as
the types do not match.
llvm-svn: 177453
r175234 allowed the analyzer to model trivial copy/move constructors as
an aggregate bind. This commit extends that to trivial assignment
operators as well. Like the last commit, one of the motivating factors here
is not warning when the right-hand object is partially-initialized, which
can have legitimate uses.
<rdar://problem/13405162>
llvm-svn: 177220
Fixes a FIXME, improves dead symbol collection, suppresses a false positive,
which resulted from reusing the same symbol twice for simulation of 2 calls to the same function.
Fixing this lead to 2 possible false negatives in CString checker. Since the checker is still alpha and
the solution will not require revert of this commit, move the tests to a FIXME section.
llvm-svn: 177206
In the test case below, the value V is not constrained to 0 in ErrorNode but it is in node N.
So we used to fail to register the Suppression visitor.
We also need to change the way we determine that the Visitor should kick in because the node N belongs to
the ExplodedGraph and might not be on the BugReporter path that the visitor sees. Instead of trying to match the node,
turn on the visitor when we see the last node in which the symbol is ‘0’.
llvm-svn: 177121
We were failing to match the output line, which led to us collecting no
stats at all, which led to a divide-by-zero error.
Fixes PR15510.
llvm-svn: 177084
When BugReporter tracks C++ references involved in a null pointer violation, we
want to differentiate between a null reference and a reference to a null pointer. In the
first case, we want to track the region for the reference location; in the second, we want
to track the null pointer.
In addition, the core creates CXXTempObjectRegion to represent the location of the
C++ reference, so teach FindLastStoreBRVisitor about it.
This helps null pointer suppression to kick in.
(Patch by Anna and Jordan.)
llvm-svn: 176969
Anton Yartsev