This patch changes the default setting for the LateVectorization flag that controls where the loop-vectorizer is ran.
Perf gains:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix -37.33%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p -22.83%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc -16.22%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3 -15.16%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt -10.34%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -7.12%
Regressions:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/lowercase 15.10%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt 13.18%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix 8.27%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench 7.30%
llvm-svn: 189858
This fixes pr13124.
From the discussion at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2012-June/022606.html
we know that we cannot make funcions in a weak_odr vtable also weak_odr. They
should remain linkonce_odr.
The side effect is that we cannot emit a available_externally vtable unless we
also emit a copy of the function. This also has an issue: If codegen is going
to output a function, sema has to mark it used. Given llvm.org/pr9114, it looks
like sema cannot be more aggressive at marking functions used because
of vtables.
This leaves us with a few unpleasant options:
* Marking functions in vtables used if possible. This sounds a bit sloppy, so
we should avoid it.
* Producing available_externally vtables only when all the functions in it are
already used or weak_odr. This would cover cases like
--------------------
struct foo {
virtual ~foo();
};
struct bar : public foo {
virtual void zed();
};
void f() {
foo *x(new bar);
delete x;
}
void g(bar *x) {
x->~bar(); // force the destructor to be used
}
--------------------------
and
----------------------------------
template<typename T>
struct bar {
virtual ~bar();
};
template<typename T>
bar<T>::~bar() {
}
// make the destructor weak_odr instead of linkonce_odr
extern template class bar<int>;
void f() {
bar<int> *x(new bar<int>);
delete x;
}
----------------------------
These look like corner cases, so it is unclear if it is worth it.
* And finally: Just nuke this optimization. That is what this patch implements.
llvm-svn: 189852
Patch by chris.wailes@gmail.com
Functions can now declare what state the consumable type the are returning will
be in. This is then used on the caller side and checked on the callee side.
Constructors now use this attribute instead of the 'consumes' attribute.
llvm-svn: 189843
This reverts commit r189648.
Fixes for the previously failing clang-side arm_neon_intrinsics test
cases will be checked in separately.
llvm-svn: 189841
This won't affect the kinds of hashes we test for as we actually
do hashing based on form and attribute. Change the fission-hash
testcase one last time to handle DW_AT_comp_dir.
llvm-svn: 189840
Made changes throughout clang-tools-extra for the renaming of
clang-replace to clang-apply-replacements as per feedback from
community.
llvm-svn: 189832
1) If the width of vectorization list candidate is bigger than vector reg width, we will break it down to fit the vector reg.
2) We do not vectorize the width which is not power of two.
The performance result shows it will help some spec benchmarks. mesa improved 6.97% and ammp improved 1.54%.
llvm-svn: 189830
This paves the way for adding support for modeling the destructor of a
region before it is deleted. The statement "delete <expr>" now generates
this series of CFG elements:
1. <expr>
2. [B1.1]->~Foo() (Implicit destructor)
3. delete [B1.1]
Patch by Karthik Bhat!
llvm-svn: 189828
For now this just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189819
Implements parsing of lambdas in the UnwrappedLineParser.
This introduces the correct line breaks; the formatting of
lambda captures are still incorrect, and the braces are also
still formatted as if they were braced init lists instead of
blocks.
llvm-svn: 189818
Summary:
I have no idea why these were there in the first place, but now they are
certainly not necessary.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1581
llvm-svn: 189813
Eric Christopher