ParseCXXClassMemberDeclaration was trying to use the result of
ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator to attach it to some late parsed attributes.
However when failures arise, we have no decl to attach to which
eventually leads us to a NULL pointer dereference.
While we are here, clean up the code a bit.
Fixes PR16765
llvm-svn: 187557
No functionality change.
In Sema helper functions:
* renamed isTypeName as HasTypenameKeyword
In UsingDecl:
* renamed get/setUsingLocation to get/setUsingLoc
* renamed is/setTypeName as has/setTypename
llvm-svn: 186816
- 'register' storage class
- dynamic exception specifications
Only the former check is enabled by default for now (the latter might be quite noisy).
llvm-svn: 183881
attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
the diagnostic's warn_ name. Switch some places (notably C++11 attributes)
which really wanted an error over to a different diagnostic. Finally, suppress
the diagnostic entirely for __ptr32, __ptr64 and __w64, to avoid producing
diagnostics in important system headers.
llvm-svn: 173788
It turns out that there's no correctness bug here (because we can't have a type
definition in this location), but there was a diagnostic bug.
llvm-svn: 173766
r159549 / r159164 regressed clang to reject
struct s {};
struct s
operator++(struct s a)
{ return a; }
This fixes the regression. Richard, pleas check if this looks right.
llvm-svn: 172834
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
Following r168626, in class declaration or definition, there are a combination of syntactic locations
where C++11 attributes could appear, and among those the only valid location permitted by standard is
between class-key and class-name. So for those attributes appear at wrong locations, fixit is used to
move them to expected location and we recover by applying them to the class specifier.
llvm-svn: 171757
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
This change list implemented logic that explicitly detects several combinations of locations where C++11 attribute
specifiers might be incorrectly placed within a class specifier. Previously we emit generic diagnostics like
"expected identifier" for such cases; now we emit specific diagnostic against the misplaced attributes, this also
fixed a bug in old code where attributes appear at legitimate locations were incorrectly rejected.
Thanks to Richard Smith for reviewing!
llvm-svn: 168626
- General C++11 attributes were previously parsed and ignored. Now they are parsed and stored in AST.
- Add support to parse arguments of attributes that in 'gnu' namespace.
- Differentiate unknown attributes and known attributes that can't be applied to statements when emitting diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 165082
Serge Pavlov