This reverts commit r197184.
Richard Smith brings up some good points, a proper implementation will
require us to mangle unnameable entities compatibly with MSVC.
llvm-svn: 197192
Testing has revealed that large integral constants (i.e. > INT64_MAX)
are always mangled as-if they are negative, even in places where it
would not make sense for them to be negative (like non-type template
parameters of type unsigned long long).
To address this, we change the way we model number mangling: always
mangle as-if our number is an int64_t. This should result in correct
results when we have large unsigned numbers.
N.B. Bizarrely, things that are 32-bit displacements like vbptr offsets
are mangled as-if they are unsigned 32-bit numbers. This is a pretty
egregious waste of space, it would be a 4x savings if we could mangle it
like a signed 32-bit number. Instead, we explicitly cast these
displacements to uint32_t and let the mangler proceed.
llvm-svn: 196771
While testing our ability to mangle large constants (PR18175), I
incidentally discovered that we did not properly mangle enums correctly.
Previously, we would append the width of the enum in bytes after the
type-tag differentiator.
This would mean "enum : short" would be mangled as 'W2' while "enum :
char" would be mangled as 'W1'. Upon testing this with several versions
of MSVC, I found that this did not match their behavior: they always use
'W4'.
N.B. Quick testing uncovered that undname allows different numbers to
follow the 'W' in the following way:
'W0' -> "enum char"
'W1' -> "enum unsigned char"
'W2' -> "enum short"
'W3' -> "enum unsigned short"
'W4' -> "enum"
'W5' -> "enum unsigned int"
'W6' -> "enum long"
'W7' -> "enum unsigned long"
However this scheme appears abandoned, I cannot get MSVC to trigger it.
Furthermore, it's incomplete: it doesn't handle "bool" or "long long".
llvm-svn: 196752
It wasn't possible for an anonymous type to show up inside of function arguments.
However, decltype (which MSVC added support for in 2010) makes this
possible. Further, backrefs to these anonymous types can now be formed.
This fixes PR18022.
N.B. We do not, and very likely _will not_, support MSVC's bug where
subsequent typedefs of anonymous types leak into the linkage name; this
is a gross violation of the ABI. A warning should be introduced to
inform our users of this particular shortcoming.
llvm-svn: 195669
Summary:
RTTI is not yet implemented for the Microsoft C++ ABI and isn't expected
soon. We could easily add the mangling, but the error is what prevents
us from silently miscompiling code that expects RTTI.
Instead, add a new mangleTypeName entry point that simply forwards to
mangleName or mangleType to produce a string that isn't part of the ABI.
Itanium can continue to use RTTI names to avoid unecessary test
breakage.
This also seems like the right design. The fact that TBAA names happen
to be RTTI names is now an implementation detail of the mangler, rather
than part of TBAA.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2153
llvm-svn: 195168
Instead of storing the vtable offset directly in the function pointer and
doing a branch to check for virtualness at each call site, the MS ABI
generates a thunk for calling the function at a specific vtable offset,
and puts that in the function pointer.
This patch adds support for emitting such thunks. However, it doesn't support
pointers to virtual member functions that are variadic, have an incomplete
aggregate return type or parameter, or are overriding a function in a virtual
base class.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2104
llvm-svn: 194827
This removes the dependency on the llvm mangler doing it for us. In isolation,
the benefit is that the testing of what mangling is applied is all in one place:
(C, C++) X (Itanium, Microsoft) are all handled by clang.
This also gives me hope that in the future the llvm mangler (and llvm-ar) will
not depend on TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 192762
Summary:
Operator new, new[], delete, and delete[] are all implicitly static when
declared inside a record. CXXMethodDecl already knows this, but we need
to account for that before we pick the calling convention for the
function type.
Fixes PR17371.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1761
llvm-svn: 192150
Summary:
When selecting a mangling for an anonymous tag type:
- We should first try it's typedef'd name.
- If that doesn't work, we should mangle in the name of the declarator
that specified it as a declaration specifier.
- If that doesn't work, fall back to a static mangling of
<unnamed-type>.
This should make our anonymous type mangling compatible.
This partially fixes PR16994; we would need to have an implementation of
scope numbering to get it right (a separate issue).
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, rjmccall, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1540
llvm-svn: 190892
Summary:
This fixes several issues with the original implementation:
- Win32 entry points cannot be in namespaces
- A Win32 entry point cannot be a function template, diagnose if we it.
- Win32 entry points cannot be overloaded.
- Win32 entry points implicitly return, similar to main.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, whunt, timurrrr
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits, nrieck
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1683
llvm-svn: 190818
Summary:
Functions named "main", "wmain", "WinMain", "wWinMain", and "DllMain"
are never mangled regardless of linkage, even when compiling for kernel
mode.
Depends on D1655
Reviewers: timurrrr, pcc, rnk, whunt
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1670
llvm-svn: 190675
Summary:
This is a first step to getting extern "C" working properly inside
clang. There are a number of quirks but mangling declarations inside
such a function are a good first step.
Reviewers: timurrrr, pcc, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1655
llvm-svn: 190671
Summary:
More accurately characterize the nature of array parameters. Doing this
removes false back-reference opportunities. Remove some hacks now that
we characterize these better.
Reviewers: rnk, timurrrr, whunt, cdavis5x
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1626
llvm-svn: 190488
Static locals requiring initialization are not thread safe on Windows.
Unfortunately, it's possible to create static locals that are actually
externally visible with inline functions and templates. As a result, we
have to implement an initialization guard scheme that is compatible with
TUs built by MSVC, which makes thread safety prohibitively difficult.
MSVC's scheme is that every function that requires a guard gets an i32
bitfield. Each static local is assigned a bit that indicates if it has
been initialized, up to 32 bits, at which point a new bitfield is
created. MSVC rejects inline functions with more than 32 static locals,
and the externally visible mangling (?_B) only allows for one guard
variable per function.
On Eli's recommendation, I used MangleNumberingContext to track which
bit each static corresponds to.
Implements PR16888.
Reviewers: rjmccall, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1416
llvm-svn: 190427
Summary:
Makes functions with implicit calling convention compatible with
function types with a matching explicit calling convention. This fixes
things like calls to qsort(), which has an explicit __cdecl attribute on
the comparator in Windows headers.
Clang will now infer the calling convention from the declarator. There
are two cases when the CC must be adjusted during redeclaration:
1. When defining a non-inline static method.
2. When redeclaring a function with an implicit or mismatched
convention.
Fixes PR13457, and allows clang to compile CommandLine.cpp for the
Microsoft C++ ABI.
Excellent test cases provided by Alexander Zinenko!
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1231
llvm-svn: 189412
Summary:
HandleTopLevelDecl on a templated function leads us to try and mangle
it.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1412
llvm-svn: 188536
Summary:
There were several things going wrong:
- We mangled in useless qualifiers like "volatile void" return types.
- We didn't propagate 64-bit pointer markers sufficiently.
- We mangled qualifiers belonging to the pointee incorrectly.
This fixes PR16844 and PR16848.
Reviewers: rnk, whunt
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1353
llvm-svn: 188450
Summary:
It seems that __uuidof introduces a global extern "C" declaration of
type __s_GUID. However, our implementation of __uuidof does not provide
such a declaration and thus must open-code the mangling for __uuidof in
template parameters.
This allows us to codegen scoped COM pointers and other such things.
This fixes PR16836.
Depends on D1356.
Reviewers: rnk, cdavis5x, rsmith
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1357
llvm-svn: 188252
We mangled them like:
L___uuid_12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc
We should've mangled them like:
__GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_123456789abc
Furthermore, they are external symbols.
llvm-svn: 188053
There were three things missing from the original implementation:
- We would omit the 'E' qualifier for members int 64-bit mode.
- We would not exmaine the qualifiers in 'IsMember' mode.
- We didn't generate the correct backref to the base class.
llvm-svn: 187753
Based on Peter Collingbourne's destructor patches.
Prior to this change, clang was considering ?1 to be the complete
destructor and the base destructor, which was wrong. This lead to
crashes when clang tried to emit two LLVM functions with the same name.
In this ABI, TUs with non-inline dtors might not emit a complete
destructor. They are emitted as inline thunks in TUs that need them,
and they always delegate to the base dtors of the complete class and its
virtual bases. This change uses the DeferredDecls machinery to emit
complete dtors as needed.
Currently in clang try body destructors can catch exceptions thrown by
virtual base destructors. In the Microsoft C++ ABI, clang may not have
the destructor definition, in which case clang won't wrap the virtual
virtual base destructor calls in a try-catch. Diagnosing this in user
code is TODO.
Finally, for classes that don't use virtual inheritance, MSVC always
calls the base destructor (?1) directly. This is a useful code size
optimization that avoids emitting lots of extra thunks or aliases.
Implementing it also means our existing tests continue to pass, and is
consistent with MSVC's output.
We can do the same for Itanium by tweaking GetAddrOfCXXDestructor, but
it will require further testing.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1066
llvm-svn: 186828
They don't seem to be used for back references, presumably because a
function template is unlikely to reoccur, while a class template name
may reoccur as a type.
This fixes a mangling issue for llvm::hash_combine() in Hashing.h.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1078
llvm-svn: 186233
Unlike Itanium, there is no code to indicate the beginning of a
parameter pack. I tested this with MSVC 2013, which is the only version
that implements variadic templates so far.
This is needed to compile APInt.cpp for the MS C++ ABI.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1077
llvm-svn: 185454
David Majnemer