Without this patch, this test was accidentally testing that
CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR, CLANG_LIBDIR_SUFFIX, and CLANG_VERSION_STRING
were set to a particular set of values.
The test was also getting pretty hairy since it was attempting to craft
a regular expression that covered "all" possible combinations of
settings for these configure-time constants.
Clean it up by directly capturing the resource directory in a FileCheck
variable.
llvm-svn: 227310
The code building the code completion string for overloads was providing
less detail compared to the one building completion strings for function
declarations. There was no information about optionals and no information
about what's a parameter and what's a function identifier, everything
besides ResultType, CurrentParameter and special characters was classified
as Text.
This makes code completion strings for overload candidates to follow a
pattern very similar, but not identical, to the one in use for function
declarations:
- return type chunk: ResultType
- function identifier chunk: Text
- parameter chunks: Placeholder
- optional parameter chunks: Optional
- current parameter chunk: CurrentParameter
llvm-svn: 227309
Otherwise, in the most important case and the only case where SS and
TempSS are different (which is when the CXXScopeSpec should be dropped,
and TempSS is NULL) the wrong SourceRange will be used in the fixit for
the typo correction. Fixes the remaining issue in PR20626.
llvm-svn: 227278
Under certain circumstances, the identifier mentioned in the diagnostic
won't match the intended correction even though the replacement
expression and the note pointing to the decl are both correct.
Basically, the TreeTransform assumes the TypoExpr's Consumer points to
the correct TypoCorrection, but the handling of typos that appear to be
ambiguous from the point of view of TransformTypoExpr would cause that
assumption to be violated by altering the Consumer's correction stream.
This fix allows the Consumer's correction stream to be reset to the
right TypoCorrection after successfully resolving the percieved ambiguity.
Included is a fix to suppress correcting the RHS of an assignment to the
LHS of that assignment for non-C++ code, to prevent a regression in
test/SemaObjC/provisional-ivar-lookup.m.
This fixes PR22297.
llvm-svn: 227251
In particular, remove the OpaqueExpr transformation from r225389 and
move the correction of the conditional from CheckConditionalOperands to
ActOnConditionalOp before the OpaqueExpr is created. This fixes the
typo correction behavior in C code that uses the GNU extension for a
binary ?: (without an expression between the "?" and the ":").
llvm-svn: 227220
selects a deleted function, the outer function is still a candidate even though
the initialization sequence is "otherwise ill-formed".
llvm-svn: 227169
The backend won't run LowerExpect on -O0. In a debug LTO build, this results in llvm.expect intrinsics being in the LTO IR which doesn't know how to optimize them.
Thanks to Chandler for the suggestion and review.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7183
llvm-svn: 227135
We appear to use 3.5.0 in the directory structure now. That's probably
unnecessary. We should probably let the micro releases update the docs
for the same minor version.
llvm-svn: 227127
... when the variable's type is a typedef of a ConstantArrayType. Just
look through the typedef (and any other sugar). We only use the
constant array type here to get the element count.
llvm-svn: 227115
clang currently calls MarkVTableUsed() for classes that get their virtual
methods called or that participate in a dynamic_cast. This is unnecessary,
since CodeGen only emits vtables when it generates constructor, destructor, and
vtt code. (*)
Note that Sema::MarkVTableUsed() doesn't cause the emission of a vtable.
Its main user-visible effect is that it instantiates virtual member functions
of template classes, to make sure that if codegen decides to write a vtable
all the entries in the vtable are defined.
While this shouldn't change the behavior of codegen (other than being faster),
it does make clang more permissive: virtual methods of templates (in particular
destructors) end up being instantiated less often. In particular, classes that
have members that are smart pointers to incomplete types will now get their
implicit virtual destructor instantiated less frequently. For example, this
used to not compile but does now compile:
template <typename T> struct OwnPtr {
~OwnPtr() { static_assert((sizeof(T) > 0), "TypeMustBeComplete"); }
};
class ScriptLoader;
struct Base { virtual ~Base(); };
struct Sub : public Base {
virtual void someFun() const {}
OwnPtr<ScriptLoader> m_loader;
};
void f(Sub *s) { s->someFun(); }
The more permissive behavior matches both gcc (where this is not often
observable, since in practice most things with virtual methods have a key
function, and Sema::DefineUsedVTables() skips vtables for classes with key
functions) and cl (which is my motivation for this change) – this fixes
PR20337. See this issue and the review thread for some discussions about
optimizations.
This is similar to r213109 in spirit. r225761 was a prerequisite for this
change.
Various tests relied on "a->f()" marking a's vtable as used (in the sema
sense), switch these to just construct a on the stack. This forces
instantiation of the implicit constructor, which will mark the vtable as used.
(*) The exception is -fapple-kext mode: In this mode, qualified calls to
virtual functions (`a->Base::f()`) still go through the vtable, and since the
vtable pointer off this doesn't point to Base's vtable, this needs to reference
Base's vtable directly. To keep this working, keep referencing the vtable for
virtual calls in apple kext mode.
llvm-svn: 227073
They are referenced from the vtable. (This worked fine, but I couldn't find
an existing test for this. Maybe I didn't look hard enough.)
llvm-svn: 227072
I broke this locally while working on PR20337 and no test caught that. Now
there's coverage for this, and a comment explaining why this is needed.
llvm-svn: 227068
This patch allows clang to have llvm reserve the x18
platform register on AArch64. FreeBSD will use this in the kernel for
per-cpu data but has no need to reserve this register in userland so
will need this flag to reserve it.
This uses llvm r226664 to allow this register to be reserved.
Patch by Andrew Turner.
llvm-svn: 227062
lit.cfg has never supported running .C files, so these tests were never
executed by check-clang. Rename them to .cpp so that they run as part of
the test suite, and minorly tweak two of them that look like they were broken
when checked in to actually pass.
llvm-svn: 227029
This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example.
There were essentially 3 options for this:
* The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this
commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce
around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression,
etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be
where the actual addition occurred)).
* The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and
certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that
progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for
independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders,
etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y
and z after the respective loads.
The problem with this is that the user would still have to think
fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being
evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan
backtrace.
* The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what
you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going
'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in
lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+
were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will
point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of
its operands.
(actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons,
but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex
assignments and other plain operators right)
llvm-svn: 227027
Filipe Cabecinhas