This would have suppressed bug 24578, about use-after-
destroy on User and MDNode. Rolled back suppression for
the sake of code cleanliness, in preferance for bug
tracking to keep track of this issue.
This reverts commit 6ff2baabc4625d5b0a8dccf76aa0f72d930ea6c0.
llvm-svn: 246484
DAGCombine has a utility wrapper around TLI's getSetCCResultType; use it in the
one place in DAGCombine still directly calling the TLI function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246482
Also delete and simplify a lot of MachineModuleInfo code that used to be
needed to handle personalities on landingpads. Now that the personality
is on the LLVM Function, we no longer need to track it this way on MMI.
Certainly it should not live on LandingPadInfo.
llvm-svn: 246478
Code generation currently does not expect unbounded loops. When
using ISL to compute the loop trip count, if we find that the
iteration domain remains unbounded, we invalidate the Scop by
creating an infeasible context.
Contributed-by: Matthew Simpson <mssimpso@codeaurora.org>
This fixes PR24634.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12493
llvm-svn: 246477
Teach FunctionAttr to infer the nonnull attribute on return values of functions which never return a potentially null value. This is done both via a conservative local analysis for the function itself and a optimistic per-SCC analysis. If no function in the SCC returns anything which could be null (other than values from other functions in the SCC), we can conclude no function returned a null pointer. Even if some function within the SCC returns a null pointer, we may be able to locally conclude that some don't.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9688
llvm-svn: 246476
This patch refactors the code to use the GCC installation detector
(modified so that it works in Solaris), and uses
ToolChain::GetFilePath everywhere once it works.
Patch by Xan López <xan@igalia.com>!
llvm-svn: 246473
A class without a name for linkage purposes gets a name along the lines
of <unnamed-type-foo> where foo is either the name of a declarator which
defined it (like a variable or field) or a
typedef-name (like a typedef or alias-declaration).
We handled the declarator case correctly but it would fall down during
template instantiation if the declarator didn't share the tag's type.
We failed to handle the typedef-name case at all.
Instead, keep track of the association between the two and keep it up to
date in the face of template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 246469
Also:
- Add a typedef to make working with the result easier.
- Update callers to use the new function.
- Make initFeatureMap out of line.
llvm-svn: 246468
This code was dead when it was committed in r23665 (Oct 7, 2005), and before it
reaches its 10th anniversary, it really should go. We can always bring it back
if we'd like, but it forms more SETCC nodes, and the way we do legality
checking on SETCC nodes is wrong in a number of places, and removing this means
fewer places to fix. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246466
If asked to prove a predicate about a value produced by a PHI node, LazyValueInfo was unable to do so even if the predicate was known to be true for each input to the PHI. This prevented JumpThreading from eliminating a provably redundant branch.
The problematic test case looks something like this:
ListNode *p = ...;
while (p != null) {
if (!p) return;
x = g->x; // unrelated
p = p->next
}
The null check at the top of the loop is redundant since the value of 'p' is null checked on entry to the loop and before executing the backedge. This resulted in us a) executing an extra null check per iteration and b) not being able to LICM unrelated loads after the check since we couldn't prove they would execute or that their dereferenceability wasn't effected by the null check on the first iteration.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12383
llvm-svn: 246465
Based on comments from Hal
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150810/292978.html),
I've changed the interface to add a callback mechanism to the
TargetFrameLowering class to query whether the specific target
supports shrink wrapping. By default, shrink wrapping is disabled by
default. Each target can override the default behaviour using the
TargetFrameLowering::targetSupportsShrinkWrapping() method. Shrink
wrapping can still be explicitly enabled or disabled from the command
line, using the existing -enable-shrink-wrap=<true|false> option.
Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12293
llvm-svn: 246463
The ISelLowering code turned insertion turned the element for the
lowest lane of a BUILD_VECTOR into an INSERT_SUBREG, this prohibited
the patterns for SCALAR_TO_VECTOR(Load) to match later. Restrict this
to cases without a load argument.
Reported in rdar://22223823
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12467
llvm-svn: 246462
X86FastISel has been using the wrong register class for VBLENDVPS which
produces a VR128 and needs an extra copy to the target register. The
problem was already hit by the existing test cases when using
> llvm-lit -Dllc="llc -verify-machineinstr"
llvm-svn: 246461
Conditionally include the fork_context parameter to __kmp_join_call()
only if OMPT_SUPPORT=1
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12495
llvm-svn: 246460
Summary:
Constant vectors weren't allowed to have an i1 condition in the
BitcodeReader. Make sure we have the same restrictions that are
documented, not more.
Reviewers: nlewycky, rafael, kschimpf
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12440
llvm-svn: 246459
Summary:
This CL is associated with a fuzzing effort to find bugs in LLVM. The
first step is to fuzz llvm-as to find potential issues in generating
IR. Both afl-fuzz and LLVM's lib/Fuzzer are being used.
This CL introduces the executable that implements the in-process
fuzzer using LLVM's lib/Fuzzer. The motivation for using lib/Fuzzer is
based on time comparisons between afl-fuzz and lib/Fuzzer. Early
results show that per-process, the lib/Fuzzer implemenation of llvm-as
(i.e. this CL) generates over 30 times the number of mutations found
by afl-fuzz, per hour runtime. The speedup is due to the removal of
overhead of forking a process, and loading the executable into memory.
I placed this under the tools directory, since it is an executable. It
is also only conditionally built if (using cmake) the flag
LLVM_USEE_SANITIZE_COVERAGE is used, so that it isn't built by
default.
Reviewers: kcc, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12438
llvm-svn: 246458
Avoid marking some MCSymbols as used in MC/AsmParser.cpp when no uses
exist. This fixes a bug in parseAssignmentExpression() which
inadvertently sets IsUsed, thereby triggering:
"invalid re-assignment of non-absolute variable"
on otherwise valid code. No other functionality change intended.
The original version of this patch touched many calls to MCSymbol
accessors. On rafael's advice, I have stripped this patch down a bit.
As a follow-up, I intend to find the call sites which intentionally set
IsUsed and force them to do so explicitly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12347
llvm-svn: 246457
Instead of building domains with MaxLoopDepth dimensions, we now build
the domains such that they have the right amount of dimensions all the
time.
llvm-svn: 246443
Before this commit we did this only for Arguments or Constants, but indeed
an instruction may define a value a lot higher up in the dominance tree, but
the actual write generally needs to happen right before branching to the
PHI node. Otherwise, the writes of different branches into PHI nodes may get
intermixed if they lay higher up in the dominance tree.
llvm-svn: 246441
Proper diagnostic and resolution of mangled names conflicts between C++ methods
and C functions. This patch implements support for functions/methods only;
support for variables is coming separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11297
llvm-svn: 246438
According to `man freopen`, passing NULL instead of a filename is valid, however the current implementation of the interceptor assumes this parameter is non-NULL. Let's fix that and add a test case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11389
llvm-svn: 246435
There is no reason the loops in a region need to touch either entry or exit
block. Hence, we need to look through all loops that may touch the region as
well as their children to understand if our region has at least two loops.
llvm-svn: 246433
Naomi Musgrave