'class' and 'struct' can be used interchangebly for forward references.
Use the same encoding otherwise we may get into a weird situation where the USR for the same
declaration is different based on whether the definition of the tag reference is visible or not.
llvm-svn: 223632
Ranges before:
void test(void (*)(int), int, float);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~
Ranges after:
void test(void (*)(int), int, float);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~
This does not change the actual location of the ParmVarDecl, it still
points to the location where the name would be. PR17970.
llvm-svn: 200640
I had to force -fno-delayed-template-parsing on some Index tests because delayed template parsing will change the output of some tests.
llvm-svn: 138942
CXXConstructorExpr/CXXTemporaryObjectExpr references the constructor
it calls. Then, tweak clang_getCursor() to prefer such a call over a
type reference to the type being called.
llvm-svn: 118297
more closely parallel the computation of linkage. This gets us to a state
much closer to what gcc emits, modulo bugs, which will undoubtedly arise in
abundance.
llvm-svn: 117147
to an "overloaded" set of declarations. This cursor kind works for
unresolved references to functions/templates (e.g., a call within a
template), using declarations, and Objective-C class and protocol
forward declarations.
llvm-svn: 113805
clang_getSpecializedCursorTemplate(), which determines the template
(or member thereof) that the given cursor specializes or from which it
was instantiated. This routine can be used to establish a link between
templates and their instantiations/specializations.
llvm-svn: 112780
three different kinds of AST nodes to represent using declarations:
UsingDecl, UnresolvedUsingValueDecl, and
UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl. These three are collapsed into a single
cursor kind for using declarations, since libclang clients don't need
the distinction.
Several related changes here:
- Cursor visitation of the three AST nodes for using declarations
- Proper source-range computation for these AST nodes
- Using declarations have no USRs, since they don't actually declare
any entities.
llvm-svn: 112730
in a few related ways:
- Don't recurse into instantiations of templates.
- Recurse into explicit specializations.
- Visit the template arguments of an explicit specialization or
explicit instantiation.
- Include template specialization arguments in the USRs for class
template specializations.
llvm-svn: 112720
template. Such cursors occur, for example, in template specialization
types such as vector<int>. Note that we do not handle the
super-interesting case where the template name is unresolved, e.g.,
within a template.
llvm-svn: 112636
libclang. This includes:
- Cursor kind for function templates, with visitation logic
- Cursor kinds for template parameters, with visitation logic
- Visitation logic for template specialization types, qualified type
locations
- USR generation for function templates, template specialization
types, template parameter types.
Also happens to fix PR7804, which I tripped across while testing.
llvm-svn: 112604
Argyrios Kyrtzidis