Previously, if you have foo=bar in a definition file, this assertion
could fire because when symbols are read from file they could be mangled.
It seems that due to historical reasons underscore mangling scheme is
really ad-hoc, and I cannot find a clean way to handle this. I had
to just de-mangle symbols to search again.
llvm-svn: 297357
The rules for dllexported symbols are overly complicated due to
x86 name decoration, fuzzy symbol resolution, and the fact that
one symbol can be resolved by so many different names. The rules
are probably intended to be "intuitive", so that users don't have
to understand the name mangling schemes, but it seems that it can
lead to unintended symbol exports.
To make it clear what I'm trying to do with this patch, let me
write how the export rules are subtle and complicated.
- x86 name decoration: If machine type is i386 and export name
is given by a command line option, like /export:foo, the
real symbol name the linker has to search for is _foo because
all symbols are decorated with "_" prefixes. This doesn't happen
on non-x86 machines. This automatic name decoration happens only
when the name is not C++ mangled.
However, the symbol name exported from DLLs are ones without "_"
on all platforms.
Moreover, if the option is given via .drectve section, no
symbol decoration is done (the reason being that the .drectve
section is created by a compiler and the compiler should always
know the exact name of the symbol, I guess).
- Fuzzy symbol resolution: In addition to x86 name decoration,
the linker has to look for cdecl or C++ mangled symbols
for a given /export. For example, it searches for not only
_foo but also _foo@<number> or ??foo@... for /export:foo.
Previous implementation didn't get it right. I'm trying to make
it as compatible with MSVC linker as possible with this patch
however the rules are. The new code looks a bit messy to me, but
I don't think it can be simpler due to the ad-hoc-ness of the rules.
llvm-svn: 246424
We were printing an error but exiting with 0.
Not sure how to test this. We could add a no-winlib feature,
but that is probably not worth it.
llvm-svn: 244109
I don't fully understand the rationale behind the name mangling
scheme used for the DLL export table and the import library.
Why only leading "_" is dropped for the import library while
both "_" and "@" are dropped from DLL symbol table? But this seems
to be what MSVC linker does.
llvm-svn: 243490
If a symbol is exported as /export:foo, and foo is resolved as a
mangled name (_foo@<number> or ?foo@@Y...), that mangled name should
be written to the export table. Previously, we wrote the original
name to the export table.
llvm-svn: 242342
Symbol foo is mangled as _foo in C and ?foo@@... in C++ on x86.
findMangle has to remove prefix underscore before mangle a given name
as a C++ symbol.
llvm-svn: 241874
Symbol names are usually mangled by appending "_" prefix on x86.
But the mangled name is not used in DLL export table. The export
table contains unmangled names.
llvm-svn: 241872
Rui Ueyama