XFAIL the tests known to fail with glibc-2.27+. This takes away
the burden of handling known failures from users, and ensures that
we will be verbosely informed when they actually start working again.
Bug report: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37804
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56062
llvm-svn: 350717
Summary:
Add allocator_returns_null.cc test to sanitizer_common and
remove all sanitizer-specific ones except:
- HWASan is not covered by sanitizer_common
- TSan allocator does not have comprehensive error reporting yet
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47971
llvm-svn: 334433
Summary:
Move the corresponding tests to the common folder (as all of the
sanitizer allocators will support this feature soon) and add the checks
specific to aligned_alloc to ASan and LSan allocators.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47924
llvm-svn: 334316
Summary:
Following up on and complementing D44404.
Currently many allocator specific errors (OOM, for example) are reported as
a text message and CHECK(0) termination, not stack, no details, not too
helpful nor informative. To improve the situation, detailed and
structured errors were defined and reported under the appropriate conditions.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47645
llvm-svn: 334034
Summary:
Currently many allocator specific errors (OOM, for example) are reported as
a text message and CHECK(0) termination, not stack, no details, not too
helpful nor informative. To improve the situation, ASan detailed errors were
defined and reported under the appropriate conditions.
Issue: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/887
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44404
llvm-svn: 328722
Summary:
LSan is functional on PPC64 Linux now, let's enable all tests.
One test required ppc specific changes: use_registers.cc.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39316
llvm-svn: 316698
This doesn't fix the failing test. Leave in the comment and the
attribute, since the used attribute is still required.
This partially reverts commit r312824
llvm-svn: 312827
Summary:
-dead_strip in ld64 strips weak interface symbols, which I believe
is most likely the cause of this test failure. Re-enable after marking the interface
function as used.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kubamracek, kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37635
llvm-svn: 312824
Remove the explicit i686 target that is completely duplicate to
the i386 target, with the latter being used more commonly.
1. The runtime built for i686 will be identical to the one built for
i386.
2. Supporting both -i386 and -i686 suffixes causes unnecessary confusion
on the clang end which has to expect either of them.
3. The checks are based on wrong assumption that __i686__ is defined for
all newer x86 CPUs. In fact, it is only declared when -march=i686 is
explicitly used. It is not available when a more specific (or newer)
-march is used.
Curious enough, if CFLAGS contain -march=i686, the runtime will be built
both for i386 and i686. For any other value, only i386 variant will be
built.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764
llvm-svn: 311924
Remove the explicit i686 target that is completely duplicate to
the i386 target, with the latter being used more commonly.
1. The runtime built for i686 will be identical to the one built for
i386.
2. Supporting both -i386 and -i686 suffixes causes unnecessary confusion
on the clang end which has to expect either of them.
3. The checks are based on wrong assumption that __i686__ is defined for
all newer x86 CPUs. In fact, it is only declared when -march=i686 is
explicitly used. It is not available when a more specific (or newer)
-march is used.
Curious enough, if CFLAGS contain -march=i686, the runtime will be built
both for i386 and i686. For any other value, only i386 variant will be
built.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764
llvm-svn: 311842
Set proper errno code on alloction failures and change valloc and
memalign implementations to satisfy their man-specified requirements.
llvm-svn: 308063
Summary:
An attempt to reland D34786 (which caused bot failres on Mac), now with
properly intercepted operators new() and delete().
LSan allocator used to always return nullptr on too big allocation requests
(the definition of "too big" depends on platform and bitness), now it
follows policy configured by allocator_may_return_null flag
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34845
llvm-svn: 306845
Summary:
LSan allocator used to always return nullptr on too big allocation requests
(the definition of "too big" depends on platform and bitness), now it
follows policy configured by allocator_may_return_null flag.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34786
llvm-svn: 306624
Summary:
This is required for standalone LSan to work with libdispatch worker threads,
and is a slimmed down version of the functionality provided for ASan
in asan_mac.cc.
Re-commit of r305695 with use_stacks=0 to get around a racy lingering pointer.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kubamracek, glider, kcc
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34247
llvm-svn: 305732
Summary:
This is required for standalone LSan to work with libdispatch worker threads,
and is a slimmed down version of the functionality provided for ASan
in asan_mac.cc.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kubamracek, glider, kcc
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34247
llvm-svn: 305695
The test was meant for Darwin anyway, so I'm not even sure it's supposed
to run on Linux. If it was, then we need time to investigate, but since
the test is new, there's no point in reverting the whole patch because
of it.
llvm-svn: 304010
Summary:
This required for any users who call exit() after creating
thread-specific data, as tls destructors are only called when
pthread_exit() or pthread_cancel() are used. This should also
match tls behavior on linux.
Getting the base address of the tls section is straightforward,
as it's stored as a section offset in %gs. The size is a bit trickier
to work out, as there doesn't appear to be any official documentation
or source code referring to it. The size used in this patch was determined
by taking the difference between the base address and the address of the
subsequent memory region returned by vm_region_recurse_64, which was
1024 * sizeof(uptr) on all threads except the main thread, where it was
larger. Since the section must be the same size on all of the threads,
1024 * sizeof(uptr) seemed to be a reasonable size to use, barring
a more programtic way to get the size.
1024 seems like a reasonable number, given that PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX
is 512 on darwin, so pthread keys will fit inside the region while
leaving space for other tls data. A larger size would overflow the
memory region returned by vm_region_recurse_64, and a smaller size
wouldn't leave room for all the pthread keys. In addition, the
stress test added here passes, which means that we are scanning at
least the full set of possible pthread keys, and probably
the full tls section.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kubamracek
Subscribers: krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33215
llvm-svn: 303887
Summary:
This required for any users who call exit() after creating
thread-specific data, as tls destructors are only called when
pthread_exit() or pthread_cancel() are used. This should also
match tls behavior on linux.
Getting the base address of the tls section is straightforward,
as it's stored as a section offset in %gs. The size is a bit trickier
to work out, as there doesn't appear to be any official documentation
or source code referring to it. The size used in this patch was determined
by taking the difference between the base address and the address of the
subsequent memory region returned by vm_region_recurse_64, which was
1024 * sizeof(uptr) on all threads except the main thread, where it was
larger. Since the section must be the same size on all of the threads,
1024 * sizeof(uptr) seemed to be a reasonable size to use, barring
a more programtic way to get the size.
1024 seems like a reasonable number, given that PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX
is 512 on darwin, so pthread keys will fit inside the region while
leaving space for other tls data. A larger size would overflow the
memory region returned by vm_region_recurse_64, and a smaller size
wouldn't leave room for all the pthread keys. In addition, the
stress test added here passes, which means that we are scanning at
least the full set of possible pthread keys, and probably
the full tls section.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kubamracek
Subscribers: krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33215
llvm-svn: 303262
These tests don't fail consistently in all cases, but they
fail most of the time on the buildbots. Mark as UNSUPPORTED for now to
avoid buildbots failing due to XPASS.
llvm-svn: 302920
Summary:
This already appears to be the case in all .cc test files,
it was probably left out of the .c test files accidentally. Make it a global
default, instead of manually adding it to each individual test.
This is needed to force leak detection for Darwin tests, where leak detection
is disabled by default.
Reviewers: m.ostapenko, kubamracek, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32297
llvm-svn: 300890
Summary:
This option is disabled by our other test suites, and will cause
failures when unit tests abort instead of failing with an error code.
Will also prevent the test suite from being too slow.
Reviewers: kubamracek, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32129
llvm-svn: 300593
Summary:
These tests aren't supported on other platforms, move them
to their own directory.
Reviewers: kubamracek, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32034
llvm-svn: 300247
Summary:
With D31555 commited, looks like basic LSan functionality
works on PPC64. Time to enable LSan there.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31995
llvm-svn: 300204
I didn't pay enough attention to the patch I reverted, now I'm going to
hit it with a bigger hammer until we can understand what the problems
are.
llvm-svn: 300044
This reverts commit r299957. It broke the Thumb bots. We need to make
sure why and maybe stop it from being tested on Thumb environments. But
for now, let's get the bots green.
llvm-svn: 300042
Julian Lettner