Summary:
Suppose `clangd::` is unresolved in the following example. Currently,
we simply use "clangd::" as the query scope. We can do better by combining with
accessible scopes in the context. The query scopes can be `{clangd::, clang::clangd::}`.
```
namespace clang { clangd::^ }
```
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall, hokein, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58448
llvm-svn: 354963
Summary:
This enables clangd to intercept compiler diagnostics and attach fixes (e.g. by
querying index). This patch adds missing includes for incomplete types e.g.
member access into class with only forward declaration. This would allow adding
missing includes for user-typed symbol names that are missing declarations
(e.g. typos) in the future.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56903
llvm-svn: 352361
ClangTidyOptions::getDefaults is not free, it will initialize all
clang-tidy modules to get check-specific options, and we don't use this
information in CodeComplete, so using an empty one (constructed by
default constructor) is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 351826
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Summary:
The isIndexedForCodeCompletion is called in the code patch of
SymbolCollector.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55206
llvm-svn: 348130
Summary: E.g. allow injected "A::A" in `using A::A^` but not in "A^".
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55065
llvm-svn: 347982
Summary:
For example, when anonymous namespace is present, duplicated namespaces might be
generated for the enclosing namespace.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54105
llvm-svn: 346224
The intention was to fall through to Function case in LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=Off builds.
Use #ifndef NDEBUG to fix -Wimplicit-fallthrough
llvm-svn: 345953
Summary:
These are available via qualifiers, but signal to noise level is low.
Keep required quailifier machinery around though, for cross-ns completion.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53571
llvm-svn: 345141
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
Summary:
This should make all-scope completion more usable. Scope proximity for
indexes will be added in followup patch.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53131
llvm-svn: 344688
This patch moves the virtual file system form clang to llvm so it can be
used by more projects.
Concretely the patch:
- Moves VirtualFileSystem.{h|cpp} from clang/Basic to llvm/Support.
- Moves the corresponding unit test from clang to llvm.
- Moves the vfs namespace from clang::vfs to llvm::vfs.
- Formats the lines affected by this change, mostly this is the result of
the added llvm namespace.
RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126657.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
llvm-svn: 344140
queue is not used after index-provided completions' merge with those from Sema
USRGeneration.h is not used after introduction of getSymbolID
llvm-svn: 343912
Summary:
The file stats can be reused when preamble is reused (e.g. code
completion). It's safe to assume that cached status is not outdated as we
assume preamble files to remain unchanged.
On real file system, this made code completion ~20% faster on a measured file
(with big preamble). The preamble build time doesn't change much.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52419
llvm-svn: 343576
Summary:
Since we plan to move handling of override suggestions to Sema with
D52225 this patch just makes sure clangd-side has no logic related to that
anymore and updates tests.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52226
llvm-svn: 343567
Summary:
When no scope qualifier is specified, allow completing index symbols
from any scope and insert proper automatically. This is still experimental and
hidden behind a flag.
Things missing:
- Scope proximity based scoring.
- FuzzyFind supports weighted scopes.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: kbobyrev, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52364
llvm-svn: 343248
Summary:
To stay fast, enable single-file-mode instead. This is fine since completions
in the preamble are simple.
The net effect for now is to suppress the spurious TopLevel completions when
completing inside the preamble.
Once Sema has include directive completion, this will be more important.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52071
llvm-svn: 342230
As discussed during D51860 review, it is better to use `llvm::Optional`
here as it has clear semantics which reflect intended behavior.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52028
llvm-svn: 342138
JSON (de)serialization of `FuzzyFindRequest` might be useful for both
D51090 and D51628. Also, this allows precise logging of the fuzzy find
requests.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51852
llvm-svn: 341802
Summary:
- DynamicIndex doesn't implement ParsingCallbacks, to make its role clearer.
ParsingCallbacks is a separate object owned by the receiving TUScheduler.
(I tried to get rid of the "index-like-object that doesn't implement index"
but it was too messy).
- Clarified(?) docs around DynamicIndex - fewer details up front, more details
inside.
- Exposed dynamic index from ClangdServer for memory monitoring and more
direct testing of its contents (actual tests not added here, wanted to get
this out for review)
- Removed a redundant and sligthly confusing filename param in a callback
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51221
llvm-svn: 341325
Summary:
Currently, a symbol can have only one #include header attached, which
might not work well if the symbol can be imported via different #includes depending
on where it's used. This patch stores multiple #include headers (with # references)
for each symbol, so that CodeCompletion can decide which include to insert.
In this patch, code completion simply picks the most popular include as the default inserted header. We also return all possible includes and their edits in the `CodeCompletion` results.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51291
llvm-svn: 341304
Summary: Only accessible via the C++ API at the moment.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51437
llvm-svn: 341065
Summary:
For index-based code completion, send an asynchronous speculative index
request, based on the index request for the last code completion on the same
file and the filter text typed before the cursor, before sema code completion
is invoked. This can reduce the code completion latency (by roughly latency of
sema code completion) if the speculative request is the same as the one
generated for the ongoing code completion from sema. As a sequence of code
completions often have the same scopes and proximity paths etc, this should be
effective for a number of code completions.
Trace with speculative index request:{F6997544}
Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, jfb, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50962
llvm-svn: 340604
Summary:
Whenever a code-completion is triggered within a class/struct/union looks at
base classes and figures out non-overriden virtual functions. Than suggests
completions for those.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, hokein, ioeric
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50898
llvm-svn: 340530
Summary:
We were handling the EnableFunctionArgSnippets only when we are producing LSP
response. Move that code into CompletionItem generation so that internal clients
can benefit from that as well.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51102
llvm-svn: 340527
Summary:
Currently we only add parantheses to the functions if snippets are
enabled, which also inserts snippets for parameters into parantheses. Adding a
new option to put only parantheses. Also it moves the cursor within parantheses
or at the end of them by looking at whether completion item has any parameters
or not. Still requires snippets support on the client side.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50835
llvm-svn: 340040
Summary:
Sema can only be used for documentation in the current file, other doc
comments should be fetched from the index.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, kadircet
Reviewed By: hokein, kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50727
llvm-svn: 340005
Summary:
Previously, clangd was trying to show documentation for the active
parameter instead, which is wrong per LSP specification.
Moreover, the code path that attempts to get parameter comments never
succeds, because no attempt is made to parse function doc comment and
extract parameter-specific parts out of it. So we also remove the code
that claims to fetch parameter comments: it is not used anymore and is
incorrect.
Reviewers: hokein, ioeric, kadircet
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50726
llvm-svn: 340004
Dmitri Gribenko