LLVM doesn't produce DWARF64, and neither does GCC. LLDB's support
for DWARF64 is only partial, and if enabled appears to also not work.
Finally, it's untested. Removing this makes merging LLVM and
LLDB's DWARF parsing implementations simpler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59235
llvm-svn: 355975
This is a very thin wrapper over a std::vector<DWARFDIE> and does
not seem to provide any real value over just using a container
directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59165
llvm-svn: 355974
This is not used outside of the private implementation of the class,
so hiding in the implementation file is a nice way of simplifying
the external interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59164
llvm-svn: 355973
Summary:
This is similar to how addr2line handles consecutive entries with the
same address - pick the last one.
Reviewers: dblaikie, friss, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: ormris, echristo, JDevlieghere, probinson, aprantl, hiraditya, rupprecht, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58952
llvm-svn: 355972
Every time a physical register reference was parsed, this would
initialize a string map for every register in in target, and discard
it for the next. The same applies for the other fields initialized
from target information.
Follow along with how the function state is tracked, and add a new
tracking class for target information.
The string->register class/register bank for some reason were kept
separately, so track them in the same place.
llvm-svn: 355970
This shaves another word off SectionBase and makes it possible to clone a
section using the implicit copy constructor.
This basically reverts r311056, which removed the mutex in order to
make the code easier to understand. On balance I think it's probably more
straightforward to have a mutex here than to have an unusual copy constructor
in SectionBase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59269
llvm-svn: 355966
Summary:
This patch contains various fixes for the unwinding and backtrace machinery on the SPARC, which doesn't work correctly in various cases. It was tested with GCC on SPARC/Solaris and SPARC/Linux.
Patch by Eric Botcazou.
Reviewers: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Subscribers: jrtc27, delcypher, vitalybuka, ro, jyknight, kubamracek, fedor.sergeev, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58431
llvm-svn: 355965
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
The included test case currently crashes on tip of tree. Rather than adding a bailout, I chose to restructure the code so that the existing helper function could be used. Given that, the majority of the diff is NFC-ish, but the key difference is that canConvertValue returns false when only one side is a non-integral pointer.
Thanks to Cherry Zhang for the test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59000
llvm-svn: 355962
Summary:
In r342843, I added deprecation warnings to some facilities that were
deprectated in C++14 and C++17. However, those deprecation warnings
were not enabled by default.
After discussing this on IRC, we had finally gotten consensus to enable
those warnings by default, and I'm getting around to doing that only
now.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58140
llvm-svn: 355961
If the variable was declared and marked as declare target, a new offload
entry with size 0 is created. But if later a definition is created and
marked as declare target, this definition is not added to the entry set
and the definition remains not mapped to the target. Patch fixes this
problem allowing to redefine the size and linkage for
previously registered declaration.
llvm-svn: 355960
darwin kernel debug session.
Originally, the kext name & uuid were emitted in the middle of the
kext-loading period's. Last week I decided to try not printing
any details about kexts that failed to load, only printing a summary
of how many failed to load.
This time I'm print different progress characters depending on whether
the kext loaded or not ("-" for not), then at the end I will print a
summary of how many kexts failed to load and a sorted list of the
kexts with the bundle ID and the uuid. It's a lot more readable.
<rdar://problem/48654569>
llvm-svn: 355958
There's a single report of a crash coming from this current_sp being NULL. I don't
have a repro case, and I couldn't get it to happen by hand-corrupting a list. We
always get an error instead. So I don't have a test case. But checking for null
is clearly right here.
<rdar://problem/48503320>
llvm-svn: 355957
We don't need to take a slice of SectionCommands in addOrphanSections()
because it is not modified until the end of the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59239
llvm-svn: 355954
The existing statepoint lowering code does something odd; it adds machine memory operands post instruction selection. This was copied from the stackmap/patchpoint implementation, but appears to be non-idiomatic.
This change is largely NFC. It moves the MMO creation logic into SelectionDAG building. It ends up not quite being NFC because the size of the stack slot is reflected in the MMO. The old code blindly used pointer size for the MMO size, which appears to have always been incorrect for larger values. It just happened nothing actually relied on the MMOs, so it worked out okay.
For context, I'm planning on removing the MOVolatile flag from these in a future commit, and then removing the MOStore flag from deopt spill slots in a separate one. Doing so is motivated by a small test case where we should be able to better schedule spill slots, but don't do so due to a memory use/def implied by the statepoint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59106
llvm-svn: 355953
Add an option to cache the generated PCH in the ModuleCache when
emitting it. This protects clients that build PCHs and read them in the
same process, allowing them to avoid race conditions between parallel
jobs the same way that Clang's implicit module build system does.
rdar://problem/48740787
llvm-svn: 355950
Summary:
This fixes an extremely long compile time caused by recursive analysis
of truncs, which were not previously subject to any depth limits unlike
some of the other ops. I decided to use the same control used for
sext/zext, since the routines analyzing these are sometimes mutually
recursive with the trunc analysis.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, sanjoy
Subscribers: sanjoy, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58994
llvm-svn: 355949
Vector imm setting instructions like XXLXORz/XXLXORspz/XXLXORdpz
Should behave like LI8.
We should set corresponding flags to allow rematerialization and other
opts in LICM, RA, Scheduling etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58645
llvm-svn: 355948
This patch adds a new option to SplitAllCriticalEdges and uses it to avoid splitting critical edges when the destination basic block ends with unreachable. Otherwise if we split the critical edge, sanitizer coverage will instrument the new block that gets inserted for the split. But since this block itself shouldn't be reachable this is pointless. These basic blocks will stick around and generate assembly, but they don't end in sane control flow and might get placed at the end of the function. This makes it look like one function has code that flows into the next function.
This showed up while compiling the linux kernel with clang. The kernel has a tool called objtool that detected the code that appeared to flow from one function to the next. https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/351#issuecomment-461698884
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57982
llvm-svn: 355947
If a symbol points to the end of a fragment, instead of searching for
fixups in that fragment, search in the next fragment.
Fixes spurious assembler error with subtarget change next to "la"
pseudo-instruction, or expanded equivalent.
Alternate proposal to fix the problem discussed in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58759.
Testcase by Ana Pazos.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58943
llvm-svn: 355946
This CL adds a script that calls C-Reduce on an input file and given the
clang crash script, which is used to generate an interestingness test
for C-Reduce.
Patch by Amy Huang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59118
llvm-svn: 355944
ICF can cause multiple symbols to start at the same virtual address.
I plan to handle this shortly, but I wanted to correct the comment for
now.
Deleted an obsolete comment about adjusting the offset for the magic
number at the beginning of the debug info stream. This adjustment is
handled at a lower level now.
llvm-svn: 355943
Yesterday I noticed a reproducer test failing after making a local
change. Removing the reproducer directory solved the issue. Add a test
case that detects this.
llvm-svn: 355941
The command interpreter holds a pointer to a DataRecorder. After
generating the reproducer, we deallocated all the DataRecorders, causing
the command interpreter to hold a non-null reference to an invalid
object.
This patch changes the behavior of the command provider to stop the
DataRecorders when a reproducer is generated, rather than deallocating
them.
llvm-svn: 355940
Summary:
This patch is the MVP version of importing the std module into the expression parser to improve C++ debugging.
What happens in this patch is that we inject a `@import std` into our expression source code. We also
modify our internal Clang instance for parsing this expression to work with modules and debug info
at the same time (which is the main change in terms of LOC). We implicitly build the `std` module on the first use. The
C++ include paths for building are extracted from the debug info, which means that this currently only
works if the program is compiled with `-glldb -fmodules` and uses the std module. The C include paths
are currently specified by LLDB.
I enabled the tests currently only for libc++ and Linux because I could test this locally. I'll enable the tests
for other platforms once this has landed and doesn't break any bots (and I implemented the platform-specific
C include paths for them).
With this patch we can now:
* Build a libc++ as a module and import it into the expression parser.
* Read from the module while also referencing declarations from the debug info. E.g. `std::abs(local_variable)`.
What doesn't work (yet):
* Merging debug info and C++ module declarations. E.g. `std::vector<CustomClass>` doesn't work.
* Pretty much anything that involves the ASTImporter and templated code. As the ASTImporter is used for saving the result declaration, this means that we can't
call yet any function that returns a non-trivial type.
* Use libstdc++ for this, as it requires multiple include paths and Clang only emits one include path per module. Also libstdc++ doesn't support Clang modules without patches.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham, shafik, friss, davide, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58125
llvm-svn: 355939
Prior to this change, the "Symbol" field of a relocation would always be
assumed to be a symbol name, and if no such symbol existed, the
relocation would reference index 0. This confused me when I tried to use
a literal symbol index in the field: since "0x1" was not a known symbol
name, the symbol index was set as 0. This change falls back to treating
unknown symbol names as integers, and emits an error if the name is not
found and the string is not an integer.
Note that the Symbol field is optional, so if a relocation doesn't
reference a symbol, it shouldn't be specified. The new error required a
number of test updates.
Reviewed by: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58510
llvm-svn: 355938
Expand MULO with constant power of two operand into a shift. The
overflow is checked with (x << shift) >> shift == x, where the right
shift will be logical for umulo and arithmetic for smulo (with
exception for multiplications by signed_min).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59041
llvm-svn: 355937
Tablegen doesn't support options that are both flags and take values as
an argument. I noticed this when doing the tablegen rewrite, but forgot
that that affected the reproducer --capture flag.
This patch makes --capture a flag and adds --capture-path to specify a
path for the reproducer. In reality I expect this to be mostly used for
testing, but it could be useful nonetheless.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59238
llvm-svn: 355936
Add a note about legacy FunctionPassManager to the LLVM tutorial.
It seems to confuse some people, worth adding a warning to the tutorial
to elaborate and suggest using `llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager` for
now. Not a perfect solution but hopefully will avoid confusion
in the meantime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59258
llvm-svn: 355930
I recently discovered a bug in llvm-cxxfilt introduced in r353743 but
was fixed later incidentally due to r355031. Specifically, llvm-cxxfilt
was attempting to call .back() on an empty string any time there was a
new line in the input. This was causing a crash in my debug builds only.
This patch simply adds a test that explicitly tests that llvm-cxxfilt
handles empty lines correctly. It may pass under release builds under
the broken behaviour, but it fails at least in debug builds.
Reviewed by: mattd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58785
llvm-svn: 355929
This patch removes two assertions that were preventing writing of a test
that checked an empty line followed by some text. For example:
CHECK: {{^$}}
CHECK-NEXT: foo()
The assertion was because the current location the CHECK-NEXT was
scanning from was the start of the buffer. A similar issue occurred with
CHECK-SAME. These assertions don't protect against anything, as there is
already an error check that checks that CHECK-NEXT/EMPTY/SAME don't
appear first in the checks, and the following code works fine if the
pointer is at the start of the input.
Reviewed by: probinson, thopre, jdenny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58784
llvm-svn: 355928
Francis Visoiu Mistrih