At first glance, this looked like a recent regression (possibly created by http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=63354, which was the only recent change to this section of Sema::ActOnStartClassInterface()). After more investigation, it looks like an edge case bug that we didn't cover in our tests.
llvm-svn: 63738
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
llvm-svn: 63733
line markers, including maintenance of the virtual include stack.
For something like this:
# 42 "bar.c" 1
# 142 "bar2.c" 1
#warning zappa
# 92 "bar.c" 2
#warning gonzo
# 102 "foo.c" 2
#warning bonkta
we now produce these three warnings:
#1:
In file included from foo.c:3:
In file included from bar.c:42:
bar2.c:143:2: warning: #warning zappa
#warning zappa
^
#2:
In file included from foo.c:3:
bar.c:92:2: warning: #warning gonzo
#warning gonzo
^
#3:
foo.c:102:2: warning: #warning bonkta
#warning bonkta
^
llvm-svn: 63722
location below it report as coming from the #line location. For example,
with:
#line 92 "foo.h"
#warning blarg!
#warning blarg!
we now emit:
foo.h:92:2: warning: #warning blarg!
#warning blarg!
^
foo.h:92:2: warning: #warning blarg!
#warning blarg!
^
llvm-svn: 63709
makes it clear to clients that they have to pick an instantiation
or spelling location before calling it and allows optimization based
on that.
llvm-svn: 63698
infrastructure to construct function type.
- For consistencty, we should probably always use this to construct
function types, but these are absolutely necessary to ensure that
we can emit calls to these functions.
llvm-svn: 63695
a.k.a. Koenig lookup) in C++. Most of the pieces are in place, but for
two:
- In an unqualified call g(x), even if the name does not refer to
anything in the current scope, we can still find functions named
"g" based on ADL. We don't yet have this ability.
- ADL will need updating for friend functions and templates.
llvm-svn: 63692
- Now only 27/500 failures on ABITest single argument tests; from
350/500. :)
- As with return types, a large percentage of these are likely to be
gcc bugs, not yet reviewed.
Also, fix bug in handling of Ignore ABI type in argument lists.
llvm-svn: 63654
Steve Naroff