1.
[(set GR32:$dst, (add GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2)),
(modify EFLAGS)]
This indicates the source pattern expects the instruction would produce 2 values. The first is the result of the addition. The second is an implicit definition in register EFLAGS.
2.
def : Pat<(parallel (addc GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2), (modify EFLAGS)), ()>
Similar to #1 except this is used for def : Pat patterns.
llvm-svn: 41897
InOperandList. This gives one piece of important information: # of results
produced by an instruction.
An example of the change:
def ADD32rr : I<0x01, MRMDestReg, (ops GR32:$dst, GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2),
"add{l} {$src2, $dst|$dst, $src2}",
[(set GR32:$dst, (add GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2))]>;
=>
def ADD32rr : I<0x01, MRMDestReg, (outs GR32:$dst), (ins GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2),
"add{l} {$src2, $dst|$dst, $src2}",
[(set GR32:$dst, (add GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2))]>;
llvm-svn: 40033
that there were two input operands before the variable operand portion. This
*happened* to be true for all call instructions, which took a chain and a
destination, but was not true for the PPC BCTRL instruction, whose destination
is implicit.
Making this code more general allows elimination of the custom selection logic
for BCTRL.
llvm-svn: 31732
X86ISD::CMP, etc.) instead of SDNode names (add, x86cmp, etc). We now allow
multiple SDNodes to map to the same SelectionDAG node (e.g. store, indexed
store).
llvm-svn: 31575
chain operand to point to the load being folded. Now we relax this, traversing
up the chain, if it doesn't reach the load, then it's ok. We will create a
TokenFactor (of all the chain operands and the load's chain) to capture all
the control flow dependencies.
llvm-svn: 30897
The dag/inst combiners often 'simplify' the masked value based on whether
or not the bits are live or known zero/one. This is good and dandy, but
often causes special case patterns to fail, such as alpha's CMPBGE pattern,
which looks like "(set GPRC:$RC, (setuge (and GPRC:$RA, 255), (and GPRC:$RB, 255)))".
Here the pattern for (and X, 255) should match actual dags like (and X, 254) if
the dag combiner proved that the missing bits are already zero (one for 'or').
For CodeGen/Alpha/cmpbge.ll:test2 for example, this results in:
sll $16,1,$0
cmpbge $0,$17,$0
ret $31,($26),1
instead of:
sll $16,1,$0
and $0,254,$0
and $17,255,$1
cmpule $1,$0,$0
ret $31,($26),1
... and requires no target-specific code.
llvm-svn: 30871
Evan Cheng