the release notes despite their awesomeness. If we had a thorough
discussion of the performance of Clang in 2.9 vs. 3.0, the first would
be more relevant, but we don't. The serialization stuff hopefully isn't
terribly visible to end users.
Objections to these omissions are of course welcome. =]
llvm-svn: 145336
accurate than my original notes were based on IRC conversations. Windows
folks, please edit as needed to make this closer to the truth if I've
still got it wrong.
llvm-svn: 145309
add a bit to that section about the many bug-finding warnings that Clang
has grown since 2.9 as this is one of the more visible new additions.
llvm-svn: 145307
stub for OpenCL work. I can't really dig enough out of the commit log
messages other than to tell that a lot of work went into this in the 2.9
-> 3.0 timeframe. I'll let the folks touching it decide if it merits
a spot in the release notes and provide the appropriate details if so.
llvm-svn: 145291
easier. Move the CUDA bits and the C1X/C++11 atomics stuff there. We
haven't exposed a __has_feature for the atomic builtins, so none of this
is available yet...
llvm-svn: 145288
The performance improvement was committed after the 3.0 branch.
Constructors/destructors are handled by the CFG, but we do not do anything
special for them in the analyzer yet.
Since we do not have an open source release qualification for the analyzer,
we are not investing into creating the proper release notes for it.
llvm-svn: 145281
worth noting in the release notes. These remain raw notes. I'll be
re-writing them into nice prose first thing tomorrow, with help from
others. A couple of notes for any reading the commits:
If you don't see something that should be mentioned, feel free to add
a note (or even a nicely written section) about it! I haven't really
done the static analyzer justice here as I don't really know what the
significant changes are other than mile-high stuff like watching it grow
C++ support and a more robust CFG. I also worry I've missed important
stuff in the Objective-C world.
If you see something that isn't worth mentioning, just delete it. I know
there are several things like this. I plan to prune the list down as
I flesh things out.
If you're name or email is on a bullet, I'll likely be sending you an
email asking for any input on that subject. For many of these I can fill
in something generic, and I'll just want you to give it a once-over.
However, if you have time, feel free to just write the blurb yourself
and drop it in, or drop it in an email to me.
Finally, *WOW* has a lot happened in Clang... I shouldn't have dreaded
(and put off) this so much, it was kind of awesome to go back and watch
the evolution. Anyways, these should be in a reasonable draft state
early tomorrow.
llvm-svn: 145247
Richard Smith