CL permits static redeclarations to follow extern declarations. The
storage specifier on the latter declaration has no effect.
This fixes PR20034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4149
llvm-svn: 211238
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
It was previously enabled in both but should only have been part of the drop-in
quirks mode that is 'MicrosoftMode' given that it's only useful for
compatibility with the Microsoft headers/runtime.
llvm-svn: 198548
MSVC applies these to the following declaration only if present, otherwise
silently ignores them whereas we'll issue a warning.
Handling differs from ordinary attributes appearing in the same place, so add a
Sema test to make sure we get it right.
llvm-svn: 195577
Summary: Some MS headers use these features.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1948
llvm-svn: 192936
r177473 made us correctly consider only those declarations in the
enclosing namespace scope when looking for a friend declaration. Under
ms-extensions mode, where we do some level of friend injection, this
meant that we were introducing a new tag type into a different scope
than what Microsoft actually does. Address this by only doing the
friend injection when we didn't see any tag with that name in any
outer scope. Fixes <rdar://problem/14250378>.
llvm-svn: 185100
This became allowed by accident in r131201, but triggers an assert.
That patch added an exception to allow conversion from pointers to
narrow integral types for MSVC compatibility. However, a pointer can
already be converted to bool in a civilized manner; allowing conversion
via reinterpret_cast is a bad idea.
Fixes PR16222.
llvm-svn: 183394
references. What's more, they use this language extension in their
ATL header files (which come as part of MFC and the Win32 SDK). This patch implements support for the Microsoft extension, and addresses PR13737.
llvm-svn: 182936
MSVC accepts this:
class A {
A::A();
};
Clang accepts regular member functions with extra qualification as an MS
extension, but not constructors. This changes the parser to defer rejecting
qualified constructors so that the same Sema logic can apply to constructors as
regular member functions. This also improves the error message when MS
extensions are disabled (in my opinion). Before it was:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:8: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
A::A();
~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
After:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:6: error: extra qualification on member 'A'
A::A();
~~~^
1 error generated.
Patch by Jason Haslam.
llvm-svn: 174980
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 163831
Example:
class A { public: int f(); };
class B : public A { private: using A::f; };
class C : public B { private: using B::f; };
Here, B::f is private so this should fail in Standard C++, but because B::f refers to A::f which is public MSVC accepts it.
This fixes 1 error when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 131896
template<class U>
struct X1 {
template<class T> void f(T*);
template<> void f(int*) { }
};
Won't be so simple. I need to think more about it.
llvm-svn: 131362
This fixes 1 error when parsing the MSVC 2008 header files.
Example:
template<class T> class A {
public:
typedef int TYPE;
};
template<class T> class B : public A<T> {
public:
A<T>::TYPE a; // no typename required because A<T> is a base class.
};
llvm-svn: 129425
enum X : long { Value = 0x100000000 };
when in Microsoft-extension mode (-fms-extensions). This (now C++0x)
feature has been supported since Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003.
llvm-svn: 126243
David Majnemer