This adds subtarget features for ARMv8.2-A, which builds on (and
requires the features from) ARMv8.1-A. Most assembler-visible features
of ARMv8.2-A are system instructions, and are all required parts of the
architecture, so just depend on the HasV8_2aOps subtarget feature.
There is also one large, optional feature, which adds 16-bit floating
point versions of all existing floating-point instructions (VFP and
SIMD), this is represented by the FeatureFullFP16 subtarget feature.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15036
llvm-svn: 254399
OpenMP 4.5 defines new clause 'priority' for 'task', 'taskloop' and 'taskloop simd' directives. Added parsing and sema analysis for 'priority' clause in 'task' and 'taskloop' directives.
llvm-svn: 254398
Calloc interceptor initially allocates memory from temp buffer (to serve dlsyms called during asan_init). There is a chance that some non-instrumented library (or executable) has allocated memory with calloc before asan_init and got pointer from the same temporary buffer which later caused problems with free.
Inspired by https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/626
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14979
llvm-svn: 254395
Use undefined instead of setzero as the pass through input since its going to be fully overwritten. Use cmpeq of two zero vectors to produce the all 1s vector. Casting -1 to a double and vectorizing causes a constant load of a -1.0 floating point value.
llvm-svn: 254389
Not sure how to test this. I noticed by inspection in the isel tables where the same pattern tried to produce DIV and DIVR or SUB and SUBR.
llvm-svn: 254388
This patch will clear bug 25194 - LLDB-Server Assertion raised when single stepping on MIPS. The problem was that while emulating instructions, old and new pc values would have garbage value in their upper 32 bits. Therefore checking if pc was changed (old_pc == new_pc) would always return false, because of which pc was not getting updated.
/* If we haven't changed the PC, change it here */
if (old_pc == new_pc)
{
new_pc += 4;
Context context;
return false;
}
Reviewers: tberghammer, clayborg
Subscribers: dsanders, lldb-commits, mohit.bhakkad, bhushan, jaydeep, nitesh.jain
Differential: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14633
llvm-svn: 254379
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
SUMMARY:
For MIPS, ARCH is specified without m.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: nitesh.jain, mohit.bhakkad, sagar, bhushan and lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14978
llvm-svn: 254376
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
This just concatenates the common DWP sections without doing any of the
fancy DWP things like:
1) update str_offsets
2) deduplicating strings
3) merging/creating cu/tu_index
Patches for these will follow shortly.
(also not sure about target triple/object file type for this tool - do I
really need a whole triple just to write an object file that contains
purely static/hardcoded bytes in each section? & I guess I should just
pick it based on the first input, maybe, rather than hardcoding for now
- but we only produce .dwo on ELF platforms with objcopy for now anyway)
llvm-svn: 254355
SDAG currently can emit debug location for function parameters when
an llvm.dbg.declare points to either a function argument SSA temp,
or to an AllocaInst. This change extends this logic by adding a
fallback case when neither of the above is true.
This is required for SafeStack, which may copy the contents of a
byval function argument into something that is not an alloca, and
then describe the target as the new location of the said argument.
llvm-svn: 254352
The current code does not take alloca array size into account and,
as a result, considers any access past the first array element to be
unsafe.
llvm-svn: 254350
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
Oliver Stannard