In SemaCUDA all implicit functions were considered host device, this led to
errors such as the following code snippet failing to compile:
struct Copyable {
const Copyable& operator=(const Copyable& x) { return *this; }
};
struct Simple {
Copyable b;
};
void foo() {
Simple a, b;
a = b;
}
Above the implicit copy assignment operator was inferred as host device but
there was only a host assignment copy defined which is an error in device
compilation mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6565
llvm-svn: 224358
Summary:
Allow CUDA host device functions with two code paths using __CUDA_ARCH__
to differentiate between code path being compiled.
For example:
__host__ __device__ void host_device_function(void) {
#ifdef __CUDA_ARCH__
device_only_function();
#else
host_only_function();
#endif
}
Patch by Jacques Pienaar.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6457
llvm-svn: 223271
r218624 implemented target inference for implicit special members. However,
other entities can be implicit - for example intrinsics. These can not have
inference running on them, so they should be marked host device as before. This
is the safest and most flexible setting, since by construction these functions
don't invoke anything, and we'd like them to be invokable from both host and
device code. LLVM's intrinsics definitions (where these intrinsics come from in
the case of CUDA/NVPTX) have no notion of target, so both host and device
intrinsics can be supported this way.
llvm-svn: 218688
As PR20495 demonstrates, Clang currenlty infers the CUDA target (host/device,
etc) for implicit members (constructors, etc.) incorrectly. This causes errors
and even assertions in Clang when compiling code (assertions in C++11 mode where
implicit move constructors are added into the mix).
Fix the problem by inferring the target from the methods the implicit member
should call (depending on its base classes and fields).
llvm-svn: 218624
In line with SemaOpenMP.cpp, etc. CUDA-specific semantic analysis code goes into
a separate file. This is in anticipation of adding extra functionality here in
the near future.
No change in functionality.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5160
llvm-svn: 217043
Jacques Pienaar