that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
why the candidate is non-viable. There's a lot we can do to improve this, but
it's a good start. Further improvements should probably be integrated with the
bad-initialization reporting routines.
llvm-svn: 93277
latter may (eventually) perform multiple levels of desugaring (thus
breaking the newly-added tests) and the former is faster. Thanks, John!
llvm-svn: 93192
they redefine is a class-name but not a typedef-name, per C++0x
[dcl.typedef]p4. The code in the test was valid C++98 and is valid
C++0x, but an unintended consequence of DR56 made it ill-formed in
C++03 (which we were luck enough to implement). Fixes PR5455.
llvm-svn: 93188
as a type or scope token if the next token requires it.
This eliminates a lot of redundant lookups in C++, but there's room for
improvement; a better solution would do a single lookup whose kind and
results would be passed through the parser.
llvm-svn: 92930
Darwin's sekrit fourth argument. This should probably be factored to
let targets make target-specific decisions about what main() should look like.
Fixes rdar://problem/7414990
or if different platforms have radically different ideas of what they want in
llvm-svn: 92128
explicitly-specified template arguments are enough to determine the
instantiation, and either template argument deduction fails or is not
performed in that context, we can resolve the template-id down to a
function template specialization (so sayeth C++0x
[temp.arg.explicit]p3). Fixes PR5811.
llvm-svn: 91852
Sema::getTypeName.
"LookupNestedNameSpecifierName" isn't quite the right kind of lookup, though;
it doesn't ignore namespaces. Someone more familiar with the lookup code
should fix this properly.
llvm-svn: 91809
Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
Clang reasonably adds all the base specifiers in one pass; this is now required
for correctness to prevent lookup from going mad. But this has the advantage of
establishing the correct context when looking up base specifiers, which will be
important for access control.
llvm-svn: 91791
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
Magically fixes all the terrible lookup problems associated with not pushing
a new scope. Resolves an ancient xfail and an LLVM misparse.
llvm-svn: 91769
small bug fixes in SemaInit, switch over SemaDecl to use it more often, and
change a bunch of diagnostics which are different with the new initialization
code.
llvm-svn: 91767
InitializationSequence. Specially, switch initialization of a C++
class type (either copy- or direct-initialization).
Also, make sure that we create an elidable copy-construction when
performing copy initialization of a C++ class variable. Fixes PR5826.
llvm-svn: 91750
new InitializationSequence. This fixes some bugs (e.g., PR5808),
changed some diagnostics, and caused more churn than expected. What's
new:
- InitializationSequence now has a "C conversion sequence" category
and step kind, which falls back to
- Changed the diagnostics for returns to always have the result type
of the function first and the type of the expression second.
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints to peform checking in C.
- Improved ASTs for initialization of return values. The ASTs now
capture all of the temporaries we need to create, but
intentionally do not bind the tempoary that is actually returned,
so that it won't get destroyed twice.
- Make sure to perform an (elidable!) copy of the class object that
is returned from a class.
- Fix copy elision in CodeGen to properly see through the
subexpressions that occur with elidable copies.
- Give "new" its own entity kind; as with return values and thrown
objects, we don't bind the expression so we don't call a
destructor for it.
Note that, with this patch, I've broken returning move-only types in
C++0x. We'll fix it later, when we tackle NRVO.
llvm-svn: 91669
used as expressions). In dependent contexts, try to recover by doing a lookup
in previously-dependent base classes. We get better diagnostics out, but
unfortunately the recovery fails: we need to turn it into a method call
expression, not a bare call expression. Thus this is still a WIP.
llvm-svn: 91525
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
Surprisingly, we *do* diagnose one of them. Since we don't really track scopes into
instantiation, this has to signal some kind of bug.
llvm-svn: 91063
declaration. Rename note_using_decl to note_using, which is possibly less confusing.
Add a test for non-class-scope using decl collisions and be sure to note the case
we can't diagnose yet.
llvm-svn: 91057
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
John McCall