"function designator".
(This causes a minor glitch in the
diagnostics for C++ member pointers, but we weren't printing the
right diagnostic there anyway.)
llvm-svn: 70307
This gets rid of a bunch of random InvalidDecl bools in sema, changing
us to use the following approach:
1. When analyzing a declspec or declarator, if an error is found, we
set a bit in Declarator saying that it is invalid.
2. Once the Decl is created by sema, we immediately set the isInvalid
bit on it from what is in the declarator. From this point on, sema
consistently looks at and sets the bit on the decl.
This gives a very clear separation of concerns and simplifies a bunch
of code. In addition to this, this patch makes these changes:
1. it renames DeclSpec::getInvalidType() -> isInvalidType().
2. various "merge" functions no longer return bools: they just set the
invalid bit on the dest decl if invalid.
3. The ActOnTypedefDeclarator/ActOnFunctionDeclarator/ActOnVariableDeclarator
methods now set invalid on the decl returned instead of returning an
invalid bit byref.
4. In SemaType, refering to a typedef that was invalid now propagates the
bit into the resultant type. Stuff declared with the invalid typedef
will now be marked invalid.
5. Various methods like CheckVariableDeclaration now return void and set the
invalid bit on the decl they check.
There are a few minor changes to tests with this, but the only major bad
result is test/SemaCXX/constructor-recovery.cpp. I'll take a look at this
next.
llvm-svn: 70020
Remove an atrocious amount of trailing whitespace in the overloaded operator mangler. Sorry, couldn't help myself.
Change the DeclType parameter of Sema::CheckReferenceInit to be passed by value instead of reference. It wasn't changed anywhere.
Let the parser handle C++'s irregular grammar around assignment-expression and conditional-expression.
And finally, the reason for all this stuff: implement C++ semantics for the conditional operator. The implementation is complete except for determining lvalueness.
llvm-svn: 69299
nested name specifiers. Now we emit stuff like:
t.cpp:8:13: error: unknown type name 'X'
static foo::X P;
~~~~ ^
instead of:
t.cpp:8:16: error: invalid token after top level declarator
static foo::X P;
^
This is inspired by a really awful error message I got from
g++ when I misspelt diag::kind as diag::Kind.
llvm-svn: 69086
that I noticed working on other things.
Instead of emitting:
t2.cc:1:8: error: use of undeclared identifier 'g'
int x(*g);
^
t2.cc:1:10: error: expected ')'
int x(*g);
^
t2.cc:1:6: note: to match this '('
int x(*g);
^
We now only emit:
t2.cc:1:7: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'
int x(*g);
^
Note that the example in SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp:f4 is still
not great, we now produce both of:
void f4(undef::C); // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'undef'}} \
expected-error {{variable has incomplete type 'void'}}
The second diagnostic should be silenced by something getting marked invalid.
I don't plan to fix this though.
llvm-svn: 68919
Implement the rvalue reference overload dance for returning local objects. Returning a local object first tries to find a move constructor now.
The error message when no move constructor is defined (or is not applicable) and the copy constructor is deleted is quite ugly, though.
llvm-svn: 68902
failures that involve malformed types, e.g., "typename X::foo" where
"foo" isn't a type, or "std::vector<void>" that doens't instantiate
properly.
Similarly, be a bit smarter in our handling of ambiguities that occur
in Sema::getTypeName, to eliminate duplicate error messages about
ambiguous name lookup.
This eliminates two XFAILs in test/SemaCXX, one of which was crying
out to us, trying to tell us that we were producing repeated error
messages.
llvm-svn: 68251
heuristics to determine when it's useful to desugar a type for display
to the user. Introduce two C++-specific heuristics:
- For a qualified type (like "foo::bar"), only produce a new
desugred type if desugaring the qualified type ("bar", in this
case) produces something interesting. For example, if "foo::bar"
refers to a class named "bar", don't desugar. However, if
"foo::bar" refers to a typedef of something else, desugar to that
something else. This gives some useful desugaring such as
"foo::bar (aka 'int')".
- Don't desugar class template specialization types like
"basic_string<char>" down to their underlying "class
basic_string<char, char_traits<char>, allocator<char>>, etc.";
it's better just to leave such types alone.
Update diagnostics.html with some discussion and examples of type
preservation in C++, showing qualified names and class template
specialization types.
llvm-svn: 68207
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
llvm-svn: 67672
Eli Friedman