The test ELF/lto/thin-archivecollision.ll was not testing what it
wanted to test. It needs two archive members with the same name, but
different offsets.
Without this we could remove all references of OffsetInArchive and all
tests would still pass.
Fixing the test showed that the --whole-archive case was broken, which
this patch fixes.
llvm-svn: 302241
"-mmacosx_version_min"
The option -mmacosx_version_min will still be the canonical option for now, but
in the future we will switch over to -mmacos_version_min and make
-mmacosx_version_min an alias instead.
rdar://27043820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32796
llvm-svn: 302240
Loop Idiom recognition was generating memset in a case that
would result generating a division operation to an unsafe location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32674
llvm-svn: 302238
SCoPs with unfeasible runtime context are thrown away and therefore
do not need their uses verified.
The added test case requires a complexity limit to exceed.
Normally, error statements are removed from the SCoP and for that
reason are skipped during the verification. If there is a unfeasible
runtime context (here: because of the complexity limit being reached),
the removal of error statements and other SCoP construction steps are
skipped to not waste time. Error statements are not modeled in SCoPs
and therefore have no requirements on whether the scalars used in
them are available.
llvm-svn: 302234
Since r294891, in MemoryAccess::computeBoundsOnAccessRelation(), we skip
manually bounding the access relation in case the parameter of the load
instruction is already a wrapped set. Later on we assume that the lower
bound on the set is always smaller or equal to the upper bound on the
set. Bug 32715 manages to construct a sign wrapped set, in which case
the assertion does not necessarily hold. Fix this by handling a sign
wrapped set similar to a normal wrapped set, that is skipping the
computation.
Contributed-by: Maximilian Falkenstein <falkensm@student.ethz.ch>
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #Polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32893
llvm-svn: 302231
Hoisting common code can cause registers that live-in in the successor
blocks to no longer be live-in. The live-in information needs to be
updated to reflect this, or otherwise incorrect code can be generated
later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32661
llvm-svn: 302228
Summary:
I have found a way to segfault lldb in 7 keystrokes! Steps to reproduce:
1) Launch lldb
2) Type `print` and hit enter. lldb will now prompt you to type a list of
expressions, followed by an empty line.
3) Hit enter, indicating the end of your input.
4) Segfault!
After some investigation, I've found the issue in Host/common/Editline.cpp.
Editline::MoveCursor() relies on m_input_lines not being empty when the `to`
argument is CursorPosition::BlockEnd. This scenario, as far as I can tell,
occurs in one specific instance: In Editline::EndOrAddLineCommand() when the
list of lines being processed contains exactly one string (""). Meeting this
condition is fairly simple, I have posted steps to reproduce above.
Reviewers: krytarowski, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: scott.smith, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32421
Patch by Alex Langford.
llvm-svn: 302225
Recently support was added for substituting one intruction for another by
negating or inverting the immediate, but ORR and ORN were missed so this patch
adds them.
This one is slightly different to the others in that ORN only exists in thumb,
so we only do the substitution in thumb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32534
llvm-svn: 302224
Summary:
Many parallel tasks just want to iterate over all the possible numbers from 0 to N-1. Rather than enqueue N work items, instead just "map" the function across the requested integer space.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, tberghammer, zturner
Reviewed By: clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32757
Patch by Scott Smith <scott.smith@purestorage.com>.
llvm-svn: 302223
llvm-dwarfdump currently prints no message if decompression fails
for some reason. I noticed that during work on one of LLD patches
where LLD produced an broken output. It was a bit confusing to see
no output for section dumped and no any error message at all.
Patch adds error message for such cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32865
llvm-svn: 302221
Summary:
Arm64 Procedure Call Standard specifies than only vectors up to 16 bytes
are stored in v0 (which makes sense, as that's the size of the
register). 32-byte vector types are passed as regular structs via x8
pointer. Treat them as such.
This fixes TestReturnValue for arm64-clang. I also split the test case
into two so I can avoid the if(gcc) line, and annotate each test
instead. (It seems the vector type tests fail with gcc only when
targetting x86 arches).
Reviewers: tberghammer, eugene
Subscribers: aemerson, omjavaid, rengolin, srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32813
llvm-svn: 302220
This reverts commit 17a84e414adb51ee375d14836d4c2a817b191933.
Patches should have been submitted in the order of:
1. D32852
2. D32854
3. D32431
I mistakenly pushed D32431(3) first. Reverting to push in the correct
order.
llvm-svn: 302217
Summary:
When compiling for GPU, one can now choose to compile for OpenCL or CUDA,
with the corresponding polly-gpu-runtime flag (libopencl / libcudart). The
GPURuntime library (GPUJIT) has been extended with the OpenCL Runtime library
for that purpose, correctly choosing the corresponding library calls to the
option chosen when compiling (via different initialization calls).
Additionally, a specific GPU Target architecture can now be chosen with -polly-gpu-arch (only nvptx64 implemented thus far).
Reviewers: grosser, bollu, Meinersbur, etherzhhb, singam-sanjay
Reviewed By: grosser, Meinersbur
Subscribers: singam-sanjay, llvm-commits, pollydev, nemanjai, mgorny, yaxunl, Anastasia
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32431
llvm-svn: 302215
Follow-up on D32846 to simplify testing and not rely on FileCheck to
test boundary conditions, and instead do all the testing in code
instead.
llvm-svn: 302212
Summary:
This change allows us to provide users and implementers of XRay handlers
a means of converting XRay function id's to addresses. This, in
combination with the facilities provided in D32695, allows users to find
out:
- How many function id's there are defined in the current binary.
- Get the address of the function associated with this function id.
- Patch only specific functions according to their requirements.
While we don't directly provide symbolization support in XRay, having
the function's address lets users determine this information easily
either during runtime, or offline with tools like 'addr2line'.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, pelikan
Subscribers: kpw, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32846
llvm-svn: 302210
This is because -print-multi-lib depends on them being flags for correctness.
Fixes a case of this in the arm-android multilib selection logic.
llvm-svn: 302207
Verifying the hash values as we are currently doing
results in iterating every type record before the user
even tries to access the first one, and the API user
has no control over, or ability to hook into this
process.
As a result, when the user wants to iterate over types
to print them or index them, this results in a second
iteration over the same list of types. When there's
upwards of 1,000,000 type records, this is obviously
quite undesirable.
This patch raises the verification outside of TpiStream
, and llvm-pdbdump hooks a hash verification visitor
into the normal dumping process. So we still verify
the hash records, but we can do it while not requiring
a second iteration over the type stream.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32873
llvm-svn: 302206
I tried to run llvm-pdbdump on a very large (~1.5GB) PDB to
try and identify show-stopping performance problems. This
patch addresses the first such problem.
When loading the DBI stream, before anyone has even tried to
access a single record, we build an in memory map of every
source file for every module. In the particular PDB I was
using, this was over 85 million files. Specifically, the
complexity is O(m*n) where m is the number of modules and
n is the average number of source files (including headers)
per module.
The whole reason for doing this was so that we could have
constant time access to any module and any of its source
file lists. However, we can still get O(1) access to the
source file list for a given module with a simple O(m)
precomputation, and access to the list of modules is
already O(1) anyway.
So this patches reduces the O(m*n) up-front precomputation
to an O(m) one, where n is ~6,500 and n*m is about 85 million
in my pathological test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32870
llvm-svn: 302205
Building the type database is expensive, and can take multiple
minutes for large PDBs. But we only need it in certain cases
depending on what command line options are specified. So only
build it when we know we're about to need it.
llvm-svn: 302204
During legalization, targets can create Pseudo Instructions with
generic types. We shouldn't try to legalize them.
Reviewed by Quentin, dsanders
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32575
llvm-svn: 302199
Compares always return a scalar integer or vector of integers. isIntegerTy returns false for vectors, but that's not completely obvious. So using isVectorTy is less confusing.
llvm-svn: 302198
The whitespace should come from the argument name in the macro
expansion, rather than from the token passed to the macro (same as it
does when not pasting).
Added a new test case for the change in behavior to stringize_space.c.
FileCheck'ized macro_paste_commaext.c, tweaked the test case, and
added a comment; no behavioral change to this test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30427
llvm-svn: 302195
Summary:
Add a simple documentation page for Clangd.
This will be useful for interested users and contributors to get basic information about how
to get started and the progress of Clangd.
Reviewers: krasimir, bkramer
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: Prazek, jbcoe, JDevlieghere, mgehre, JonasToth, kromanenkov, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31887
llvm-svn: 302191
Rafael Espindola