Small cleanup in the handling of user-defined conversions.
Also, implement an optimization when constructing a call. We avoid
recomputing implicit conversion sequences and instead use those
conversion sequences that we computed as part of overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 62231
Duplicate-member checking within classes is still a little messy, and
anonymous unions are still completely broken in C. We'll need to unify
the handling of fields in C and C++ to make this code applicable in
both languages.
llvm-svn: 61878
functions. They work except that name lookup within the default
arguments needs to be deferred until the class definition is complete
(see FIXME in the test).
llvm-svn: 61059
being called to be converted to a reference-to-function,
pointer-to-function, or reference-to-pointer-to-function. This is done
through "surrogate" candidate functions that model the conversions
from the object to the function (reference/pointer) and the
conversions in the arguments.
llvm-svn: 59674
with function call syntax, e.g.,
Functor f;
f(x, y);
This is the easy part of handling calls to objects of class type
(C++ [over.call.object]). The hard part (coping with conversions from
f to function pointer or reference types) will come later. Nobody uses
that stuff anyway, right? :)
llvm-svn: 59663
built-in operator candidates. Test overloading of '&' and ','.
In C++, a comma expression is an lvalue if its right-hand
subexpression is an lvalue. Update Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59643
post-decrement, including support for generating all of the built-in
operator candidates for these operators.
C++ and C have different rules for the arguments to the builtin unary
'+' and '-'. Implemented both variants in Sema::ActOnUnaryOp.
In C++, pre-increment and pre-decrement return lvalues. Update
Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59638
operators. For example, one can now write "x + y" where x or y is a
class or enumeration type, and Clang will perform overload resolution
for "+" based on the overloaded operators it finds.
The other kinds of overloadable operators in C++ will follow this same
approach.
Three major issues remain:
1) We don't find member operators
2) Since we don't have user-defined conversion operators, we can't
call any of the built-in overloaded operators in C++ [over.built].
3) Once we've done the semantic checks, we drop the overloaded
operator on the floor; it doesn't get into the AST at all.
llvm-svn: 58821
operators in C++. Overloaded operators can be called directly via
their operator-function-ids, e.g., "operator+(foo, bar)", but we don't
yet implement the semantics of operator overloading to handle, e.g.,
"foo + bar".
llvm-svn: 58817
Implicit declaration of destructors (when necessary).
Extended Declarator to store information about parsed constructors
and destructors; this will be extended to deal with declarators that
name overloaded operators (e.g., "operator +") and user-defined
conversion operators (e.g., "operator int").
llvm-svn: 58767
Douglas Gregor