Summary:
N32 uses the same register context as N64. However, N32 requires one
change to properly fetch addresses from registers stored in memory.
Since N32 is an ILP32 platform, getP() only fetches the first 32-bits
of a stored register. For a big-endian platform this fetches the
upper 32-bits which will be zero. To fix this, add a new
getRegister() method to AddressSpace which is responsible for
extracting the address stored in a register in memory. This matches
getP() for all current ABIs except for N32 where it reads the 64-bit
register and returns the low 32-bits as an address. The
DwarfInstructions::getSavedRegister() method uses
AddressSpace::getRegister() instead of AddressSpace::getP().
Reviewers: sdardis, compnerd
Reviewed By: sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39074
llvm-svn: 326250
Throw away MallocChecker warnings that occur after releasing a pointer within a
destructor (or its callees) after performing C11 atomic fetch_add or fetch_sub
within that destructor (or its callees).
This is an indication that the destructor's class is likely a
reference-counting pointer. The analyzer is not able to understand that the
original reference count is usually large enough to avoid most use-after-frees.
Even when the smart pointer is a local variable, we still have these false
positives that this patch suppresses, because the analyzer doesn't currently
support atomics well enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43791
llvm-svn: 326249
The SVal for any empty C++ object is an UnknownVal. Because RegionStore does
not have binding extents, binding an empty object to an UnknownVal may
potentially overwrite existing bindings at the same offset.
Therefore, when performing a trivial copy of an empty object, don't try to
take the value of the object and bind it to the copy. Doing nothing is accurate
enough, and it doesn't screw any existing bindings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43714
llvm-svn: 326247
Sometimes it is not known at compile time which temporary objects will be
constructed, eg. 'x ? A() : B()' or 'C() || D()'. In this case we track which
temporary was constructed to know how to properly call the destructor.
Once the construction context for temporaries was introduced, we moved the
tracking code to the code that investigates the construction context.
Bring back the old mechanism because construction contexts are not always
available yet - eg. in the case where a temporary is constructed without a
constructor expression, eg. returned from a function by value. The mechanism
should still go away eventually.
Additionally, fix a bug in the temporary cleanup code for the case when
construction contexts are not available, which could lead to temporaries
staying in the program state and increasing memory consumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43666
llvm-svn: 326246
If a variable or an otherwise a concrete typed-value region is being
placement-new'ed into, its dynamic type may change in arbitrary manners. And
when the region is used, there may be a third type that's different from both
the static and the dynamic type. It cannot be *completely* different from the
dynamic type, but it may be a base class of the dynamic type - and in this case
there isn't (and shouldn't be) any indication anywhere in the AST that there is
a derived-to-base cast from the dynamic type to the third type.
Perform a generic cast (evalCast()) from the third type to the dynamic type
in this case. From the point of view of the SVal hierarchy, this would have
produced non-canonical SVals if we used such generic cast in the normal case,
but in this case there doesn't seem to be a better option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43659
llvm-svn: 326245
Automatic destructors are missing in the CFG in situations like
const int &x = C().x;
For now it's better to disable construction inlining, because inlining
constructors while doing nothing on destructors is very bad.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43689
llvm-svn: 326240
ConstructionContext is moved into a separate translation unit and is separated
into multiple classes. The "old" "raw" ConstructionContext is renamed into
ConstructionContextLayer - which corresponds to the idea of building the context
gradually layer-by-layer, but it isn't easy to use in the clients. Once
CXXConstructExpr is reached, layers that we've gathered so far are transformed
into the actual, "new-style" "flat" ConstructionContext, which is put into the
CFGConstructor element and has no layers whatsoever (until it actually needs
them, eg. aggregate initialization). The new-style ConstructionContext is
instead presented as a variety of sub-classes that enumerate different ways of
constructing an object in C++. There are 5 of these supported for now,
which is around a half of what needs to be supported.
The layer-by-layer buildup process is still a little bit weird, but it hides
all the weirdness in one place, that sounds like a good thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43533
llvm-svn: 326238
This is similar to what's done in computeKnownBits and computeSignBits. Don't do anything fancy just collect information valid for any element.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43789
llvm-svn: 326237
This patch uses the reference to MaterializeTemporaryExpr stored in the
construction context since r326014 in order to model that expression correctly.
When modeling MaterializeTemporaryExpr, instead of copying the raw memory
contents from the sub-expression's rvalue to a completely new temporary region,
that we conjure up for the lack of better options, we now have the better
option to recall the region into which the object was originally constructed
and declare that region to be the value of the expression, which is semantically
correct.
This only works when the construction context is available, which is worked on
independently.
The temporary region's liveness (in the sense of removeDeadBindings) is extended
until the MaterializeTemporaryExpr is resolved, in order to keep the store
bindings around, because it wouldn't be referenced from anywhere else in the
program state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43497
llvm-svn: 326236
In these combinations, link a DLL as usual, but pass -Bstatic instead
of -Bdynamic to indicate prefering static libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43811
llvm-svn: 326235
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36474
In general, getSVal API should be changed so that it does not crash on
some non-obvious conditions.
It should either be updated to require a type, or to return Optional<SVal>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43801
llvm-svn: 326233
We were always setting the block alignment to 2 bytes in Thumb mode
and 4-bytes in ARM mode (r325754, and r325012), but this could cause
reducing the block alignment when it already had been aligned (e.g.
in Thumb mode when the block is a CPE that was already 4-byte aligned).
Patch by Momchil Velikov, I've only added a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43777
llvm-svn: 326232
Following DW_AT_sibling attributes completely defeats the pruning pass.
Although clang doesn't generate the DW_AT_sibling attribute we should
still handle it correctly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43439
llvm-svn: 326231
Summary: This fixes a glitch where ``operator: value`` in a text proto would mess up the underlying formatting since it gets parsed as a kw_operator instead of an identifier.
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43830
llvm-svn: 326227
These tables add 3000 lines to X86InstrInfo.cpp. And if we ever manage to auto generate them they'll be a separate file anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43806
llvm-svn: 326225
Summary:
This is done via new LIBUNWIND_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS and
LIBUNWIND_TEST_LINKER_FLAGS variables.
Reviewed By: sdardis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43585
llvm-svn: 326223
This is a slight reduction of one of the benchmarks
that suffered with D43079. Cost model changes should
not cause this test to remain scalarized.
llvm-svn: 326221
Return a new CompilerRT Path on NetBSD: "netbsd", instead of
getOS(), which returns a string like "netbsd8.9.12".
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
llvm-svn: 326219
This test contained a copy of the inferior used by most of llgs test.
This was done to enable better paralelization, but now it's irrelevant.
llvm-svn: 326218
This is a slight reduction of one of the benchmarks
that suffered with D43079. Cost model changes should
not cause this test to remain scalarized.
llvm-svn: 326217
This is a workarond for the fallout from D42644:
[asan] Intercept std::rethrow_exception indirectly.
Reported problem on NetBSD/amd64:
$ sh ./projects/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/asan-i386-NetBSD/NetBSD/Output/ttyent.cc.script
/usr/lib/i386/libgcc.a(unwind-dw2.o): In function `_Unwind_RaiseException':
unwind-dw2.c:(.text+0x1b41): multiple definition of `_Unwind_RaiseException'
/public/llvm-build/lib/clang/7.0.0/lib/netbsd/libclang_rt.asan-i386.a(asan_interceptors.cc.o):/public/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:337: first defined here
clang-7.0: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
llvm-svn: 326216
Currently when abort is enabled, we get a diagnostic saying "Fallback
path used .... " and the program terminates. To actually figure out what
the reason is, we need to run again with another verbose argument
"-pass-remarks-missed=gisel". Instead, when we are going to abort,
we might as well print expensive remarks.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43796
llvm-svn: 326215
If several member expressions are mapped and they reference the same
address as a base, but access different members, this must be allowed.
llvm-svn: 326212
Re-enable commit r323991 now that r325931 has been committed to make
MachineOperand::isRenamable() check more conservative w.r.t. code
changes and opt-in on a per-target basis.
llvm-svn: 326208
Summary:
Instead of using `AlignedChunkHeaderSize`, introduce a `constexpr` function
`getHeaderSize` in the `Chunk` namespace. Switch `RoundUpTo` to a `constexpr`
as well (so we can use it in `constexpr` declarations). Mark a few variables
in the areas touched as `const`.
Overall this has no functional change, and is mostly to make things a bit more
consistent.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43772
llvm-svn: 326206
Summary:
This fixes a few issues djasper@ brought up in his review of D43522.
Test Plan:
make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43598
llvm-svn: 326205
Summary:
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is Clang-tools-extra part.
Clang part is D43779.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: ioeric, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43780
llvm-svn: 326202
Summary:
Noticed during review of D41102.
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is clang part.
Clang-tools-extra part is D43780.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779
llvm-svn: 326201
John Baldwin