This adds a new subtarget feature called FPARMv8 (implied by NEON), and
predicates the support of the FP instructions and registers on this feature.
llvm-svn: 193739
Adds a subtarget feature for the CRC instructions (optional in v8-A) to the ARM (32-bit) backend.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2036
llvm-svn: 193599
an MCExpr, in order to avoid writing an encoded zero value in the immediate
field.
When getUnconditionalBranchTargetOpValue is called with an MCExpr target, we
don't know what the final immediate field value should be. We shouldn't
explicitly set the immediate field to an encoded zero value as zero is encoded
with a non-zero bit pattern. This leads to bits being set that pollute the
final immediate value. The nature of the encoding is such that the polluted
bits only affect very large immediate values, explaining why this hasn't
caused problems earlier.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15155975>.
llvm-svn: 193535
This commit allows the ARM integrated assembler to parse
and assemble the code with .eabi_attribute, .cpu, and
.fpu directives.
To implement the feature, this commit moves the code from
AttrEmitter to ARMTargetStreamers, and several new test
cases related to cortex-m4, cortex-r5, and cortex-a15 are
added.
Besides, this commit also change the Subtarget->isFPOnlySP()
to Subtarget->hasD16() to match the usage of .fpu directive.
This commit changes the test cases:
* Several .eabi_attribute directives in
2010-09-29-mc-asm-header-test.ll are removed because the .fpu
directive already cover the functionality.
* In the Cortex-A15 test case, the value for
Tag_Advanced_SIMD_arch has be changed from 1 to 2,
which is more precise.
llvm-svn: 193524
When assembling, a .thumb_func directive is supposed to be applicable to the
next symbol definition, even if there are intervening directives. We were
racing ahead to try and find it, and this commit should fix the issue.
Patch by Gabor Ballabas
llvm-svn: 193403
This prevents us from silently accepting invalid instructions on (for example)
Cortex-M4 with just single-precision VFP support.
No tests for the extra Pat Requires because they're essentially assertions: the
affected code should have been lowered to libcalls before ISel.
rdar://problem/15302004
llvm-svn: 193354
The fused multiply instructions were added in VFPv4 but are still NEON
instructions, in particular they shouldn't be available on a Cortex-M4 not
matter how floaty it is.
llvm-svn: 193342
If an alias inherits directly from InstAlias then it doesn't get any default
"Requires" values, so llvm-mc will allow it even on architectures that don't
support the underlying instruction.
This tidies up the obvious VFP and NEON cases I found.
llvm-svn: 193340
POP instructions are aliased to the ARM LDM variants but have different syntax.
This caused two problems: we tried to access a non-existent operand to annotate
the '!', and the error message didn't make much sense.
With some vigorous hand-waving in the error message both problems can be
fixed.
llvm-svn: 193322
The set of circumstances where the writeback register is allowed to be in the
list of registers is rather baroque, but I think this implements them all on
the assembly parsing side.
For disassembly, we still warn about an ARM-mode LDM even if the architecture
revision is < v7 (the required architecture information isn't available). It's
a silly instruction anyway, so hopefully no-one will mind.
rdar://problem/15223374
llvm-svn: 193185
These instructions are logically related as they allow read/write of MSA control registers.
Currently MSA control registers are emitted by number but hopefully that will change as soon
as GAS starts accepting them by name as that would make the assembly easier to read.
llvm-svn: 193078
This is another (final?) stab at making us able to parse our own asm output
on Windows.
Symbols on Windows often contain @'s and ?'s in their names. Our asm parser
didn't like this. ?'s were not allowed, and @'s were intepreted as trying to
reference PLT/GOT/etc.
We can't just add quotes around the bad names, since e.g. for MinGW, we use gas
to assemble, and it doesn't like quotes in some places (notably in .def
directives).
This commit makes us allow ?'s in symbol names, and @'s in symbol names for MS
assembly.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1978
llvm-svn: 193000
This caused the clang-native-mingw32-win7 buildbot to break.
The assembler was complaining about the following lines that were showing up
in the asm for CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:
movl $"__ZL16ExceptionHandlerP19_EXCEPTION_POINTERS@4", 4(%eax)
calll "_AddVectoredExceptionHandler@8"
.def "__ZL16ExceptionHandlerP19_EXCEPTION_POINTERS@4";
"__ZL16ExceptionHandlerP19_EXCEPTION_POINTERS@4":
calll "_RemoveVectoredExceptionHandler@4"
Reverting for now.
llvm-svn: 192940
class. The instruction class includes the signed saturating doubling
multiply-add long, signed saturating doubling multiply-subtract long, and
the signed saturating doubling multiply long instructions.
llvm-svn: 192908
The reason this got reverted was that the @feat.00 symbol which was emitted
for every TU became quoted, and on cygwin/mingw we use the gas assembler which
couldn't handle the quotes.
This commit fixes the problem by only emitting @feat.00 for win32, where we use
clang -cc1as to assemble. gas would just drop this symbol anyway, so there is no
loss there.
With @feat.00 gone, there shouldn't be quoted symbols showing up on cygwin since
it uses the Itanium ABI, which doesn't put these funny characters in symbols.
> Because of win32 mangling, we produce symbol and section names with
> funny characters in them, most notably @ characters.
>
> MC would choke on trying to parse its own assembly output. This patch addresses
> that by:
>
> - Making @ trigger quoting of symbol names
> - Also quote section names in the same way
> - Just parse section names like other identifiers (to allow for quotes)
> - Don't assume @ signifies a symbol variant if it is in a string.
llvm-svn: 192859
Hao Liu