Chromium's gold build seems to have trouble with this (gold produces
errors) - not sure if it's gold that's not coping with the valid
representation, or a bug in the implementation in LLVM, etc.
llvm-svn: 309630
When the first instruction of a basic block has no location (consider a
LEA materializing the address of an alloca for a call), we want to start
the line table for the block with the first valid source location in the
block. We need to ignore DBG_VALUE instructions during this scan to get
decent line tables.
llvm-svn: 309628
CodeGenFunction::EmitTypeMetadataCodeForVCall() could output an
llvm.assume(llvm.type.test())when CFI was enabled, optimizing out the
vcall check. This case was only reached when: 1) CFI-vcall was enabled,
2) -fwhole-program-tables was specified, and 3)
-fno-sanitize-trap=cfi-vcall was specified.
Patch by Vlad Tsyrklevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36013
llvm-svn: 309622
D33925 added a control flow simplification for -O2 --lto-O0 builds that
manually splits blocks and reassigns conditional branches but does not
correctly update phi nodes. If the else case being branched to had
incoming phi nodes the control-flow simplification would leave phi nodes
in that BB with an unhandled predecessor.
Patch by Vlad Tsyrklevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36012
llvm-svn: 309621
A change to InstCombine broke this test, but we generally frown on running optimizations clang tests anyway. So I've updated the checks to not depend on optimizations anymore.
llvm-svn: 309616
This allows -polly-optree to move instructions that depend on
synthesizable values.
The difficulty for synthesizable values is that their value depends on
the location. When it is moved over a loop header, and the SCEV
expression depends on the loop induction variable (SCEVAddRecExpr), it
would use the current induction variable instead of the last one.
At the moment we cannot forward PHI nodes such that crossing the header
of loops referenced by SCEVAddRecExpr is not possible (assuming the loop
header has at least two incoming blocks: for entering the loop and the
backedge, such any instruction to be forwarded must have a phi between
use and definition).
A remaining issue is when the forwarded value is used after the loop,
but is only synthesizable inside the loop. This happens e.g. if
ScalarEvolution is unable to determine the number of loop iterations or
the initial loop value. We do not forward in this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36102
llvm-svn: 309609
We don't write any actual symbols to this stream yet, but for
now we just create the stream and hook it up to the appropriate
places and give it a valid header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35290
llvm-svn: 309608
Before we were doing it with --export-dynamic. That seems incorrect.
The intention of --export-dynamic is to export symbols *defined* in
the executable.
llvm-svn: 309605
This intrinsic clears the upper bits starting at a specified index. If the index is a constant we can do some simplifications.
This could be in InstSimplify, but we don't handle any target specific intrinsics there today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36069
llvm-svn: 309604
This patch adds simplification support for the BEXTR/BEXTRI intrinsics to match gcc. This only supports cases that fold to 0 or can be fully constant folded. Theoretically we could support converting to AND if the shift part is unused or to only a shift if the mask doesn't modify any bits after an equivalent shl. gcc doesn't do these transformations either.
I put this in InstCombine, but it could be done in InstSimplify. It would be the first target specific intrinsic in InstSimplify.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36063
llvm-svn: 309603
Summary:
This is an alternative solution to running the lit test suite on bots
without polluting the source directory. Each input test suite gets an
auto-generated site config in the build directory that points back to
the test input source directory.
This adds some cmake comlexity, but now we don't need to remove and
re-copy the test input directory before every test.
Reviewers: delcypher, modocache
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36026
llvm-svn: 309602
Summary:
`CheckForPvallocOverflow` was introduced with D35818 to detect when pvalloc
would wrap when rounding up to the next multiple of the page size.
Add this check to MSan's pvalloc implementation.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36093
llvm-svn: 309601
This patch refactors the code used in llc such that all the users of the
addPassesToEmitFile API have access to a homogeneous way of handling
start/stop-after/before options right out of the box.
In particular, just invoking addPassesToEmitFile will set the proper
pipeline without additional effort (modulo parsing a .mir file if the
start-before/after options are used.
NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30913
llvm-svn: 309599
This fixes a dependency inconsistency, where addMinGWDefines in Targets.cpp
(used from other architectures than X86) called the addCygMingDefines function
in X86.h.
This was inconsistently split in SVN r308791 (D35701).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36072
llvm-svn: 309598
As noted in the code comment, transforming this in the other direction might require
a separate transform here in CGP given the block-at-a-time DAG constraint.
Besides that theoretical motivation, there are 2 practical motivations for the
subtract-of-cmps form:
1. The codegen for both x86 and PPC is better for this IR (though PPC could be better still).
There is discussion about canonicalizing IR to the select form
( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/114885.html ),
so we probably need to add DAG transforms for those patterns anyway, but this improves the
memcmp output without waiting for that step.
2. If we allow vector-sized chunks for the load and compare, x86 is better prepared to convert
that to optimal code when using subtract-of-cmps, so another prerequisite patch is avoided
if we choose to enable that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34904
llvm-svn: 309597
These were taking priority over the aligned load instructions since there is no vmovda8/16. I don't think there is really a difference between aligned and unaligned on newer cpus so I don't think it matters which instructions we use.
But with this change we reduce the size of the isel table a little and we allow the aligned information to pass through to the evex->vec pass and produce the same output has avx/avx2 in some cases.
I also generally dislike patterns rooted in a bitcast which these were.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35977
llvm-svn: 309589
In addition to array and PHI writes, also allow scalar value writes.
The only kind of write not allowed are writes by functions
(including memcpy/memmove/memset).
llvm-svn: 309582
Current LLDB (that is without DWZ support) crashes accessing Fedora debug info:
READ of size 8 at 0x60200000ffc8 thread T0
#0 in DWARFDebugInfoEntry::BuildAddressRangeTable(SymbolFileDWARF*, DWARFCompileUnit const*, DWARFDebugAranges*) const tools/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp:1336
Greg Clayton: We will need a warning to be emitted in
SymbolFileDWARF::CalculateAbilities() stating we won't parse the DWARF due to
"unsupported DW_FORM value of 0x1f20".
Patch has been mostly written by Greg Clayton.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35622
llvm-svn: 309581
DIEs are lazily deserialized so it's possible that the DWO CU is created
before the DIE is parsed. DWO shares .debug_addr and .debug_ranges with the
object file so overwriting the offset with 0 will make the CU unusable.
No test case because I couldn't get clang to emit a non-zero range base.
llvm-svn: 309570
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR33947.
https://godbolt.org/g/54XRMT
void f(int a) {
struct A {
void g(int a) {}
A() { int a; }
};
}
3 : <source>:3:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
void g(int a) {}
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
4 : <source>:4:15: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
A() { int a; }
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
2 warnings generated.
The local variable `a` of the function `f` can't be accessed from a method of
the function-local class A, thus no shadowing occurs and no diagnostic is
needed.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, arphaman, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: rnk, Quuxplusone
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35941
llvm-svn: 309569
David Blaikie