ThinLTO: don't perform incremental LTO on module without a hash

Clang always emit a hash for ThinLTO, but as other frontend are
starting to use ThinLTO, this could be a serious bug.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379

llvm-svn: 283655
This commit is contained in:
Mehdi Amini 2016-10-08 04:44:23 +00:00
parent 00fa1409ec
commit f82bda0a7a
4 changed files with 37 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -542,8 +542,12 @@ public:
};
auto ModuleID = MBRef.getBufferIdentifier();
if (!Cache || !CombinedIndex.modulePaths().count(ModuleID))
// Cache disabled or no entry for this module in the combined index
if (!Cache || !CombinedIndex.modulePaths().count(ModuleID) ||
all_of(CombinedIndex.getModuleHash(ModuleID),
[](uint32_t V) { return V == 0; }))
// Cache disabled or no entry for this module in the combined index or
// no module hash.
return RunThinBackend(AddStream);
SmallString<40> Key;

View File

@ -243,6 +243,13 @@ public:
// export list, the hash for every single module in the import list, the
// list of ResolvedODR for the module, and the list of preserved symbols.
// Include the hash for the current module
auto ModHash = Index.getModuleHash(ModuleID);
if (all_of(ModHash, [](uint32_t V) { return V == 0; }))
// No hash entry, no caching!
return;
SHA1 Hasher;
// Start with the compiler revision
@ -251,8 +258,6 @@ public:
Hasher.update(LLVM_REVISION);
#endif
// Include the hash for the current module
auto ModHash = Index.getModuleHash(ModuleID);
Hasher.update(ArrayRef<uint8_t>((uint8_t *)&ModHash[0], sizeof(ModHash)));
for (auto F : ExportList)
// The export list can impact the internalization, be conservative here

View File

@ -1,6 +1,28 @@
; Verify first that *without* hash, we don't use the cache.
; RUN: opt -module-summary %s -o %t.bc
; RUN: opt -module-summary %p/Inputs/cache.ll -o %t2.bc
; Verify that enabling caching is ignoring module without hash
; RUN: rm -Rf %t.cache && mkdir %t.cache
; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto-action=run -exported-symbol=globalfunc %t2.bc %t.bc -thinlto-cache-dir %t.cache
; RUN: ls %t.cache/llvmcache.timestamp
; RUN: ls %t.cache | count 1
; Verify that enabling caching is ignoring module without hash with llvm-lto2
; RUN: rm -Rf %t.cache && mkdir %t.cache
; RUN: llvm-lto2 -o %t.o %t2.bc %t.bc -cache-dir %t.cache \
; RUN: -r=%t2.bc,_main,plx \
; RUN: -r=%t2.bc,_globalfunc,lx \
; RUN: -r=%t.bc,_globalfunc,plx
; RUN: ls %t.cache | count 0
; Repeat again, *with* hash this time.
; RUN: opt -module-hash -module-summary %s -o %t.bc
; RUN: opt -module-hash -module-summary %p/Inputs/cache.ll -o %t2.bc
; Verify that enabling caching is working
; RUN: rm -Rf %t.cache && mkdir %t.cache
; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto-action=run -exported-symbol=globalfunc %t2.bc %t.bc -thinlto-cache-dir %t.cache

View File

@ -22,13 +22,13 @@
; RUN: rm -Rf %t.cache && mkdir %t.cache
; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto-action=run %t2.bc %t.bc -exported-symbol=main -thinlto-cache-dir %t.cache
; RUN: ls %t.cache/llvmcache.timestamp
; RUN: ls %t.cache | count 2
; RUN: ls %t.cache | count 1
; Verify that caching is disabled for module without hash, with llvm-lto2
; RUN: rm -Rf %t.cache && mkdir %t.cache
; RUN: llvm-lto2 -o %t.o %t2.bc %t.bc -cache-dir %t.cache \
; RUN: -r=%t2.bc,_main,plx
; RUN: ls %t.cache | count 1
; RUN: ls %t.cache | count 0
target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"