Emulate a MSVC bug where if during an using declaration name lookup, the declaration found is unaccessible (private) and that declaration was bring into scope via another using declaration whose target declaration is accessible (public) then no error is generated.

Example:
class A { public: int f();  };
class B : public A { private: using A::f; };
class C : public B { private: using B::f; };

Here, B::f is private so this should fail in Standard C++, but because B::f refers to A::f which is public MSVC accepts it.

This fixes 1 error when parsing MFC code with clang.

llvm-svn: 131896
This commit is contained in:
Francois Pichet 2011-05-23 03:43:44 +00:00
parent bc90690b24
commit efb1af9ae8
5 changed files with 88 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -596,6 +596,10 @@ def err_class_redeclared_with_different_access : Error<
"%0 redeclared with '%1' access">;
def err_access : Error<
"%1 is a %select{private|protected}0 member of %3">, AccessControl;
def war_ms_using_declaration_inaccessible : ExtWarn<
"using declaration refers to inaccessible member '%0', which refers "
"to accessible member '%1', accepted for Microsoft compatibility">,
AccessControl, InGroup<Microsoft>;
def err_access_ctor : Error<
"calling a %select{private|protected}0 constructor of class %2">,
AccessControl;

View File

@ -282,6 +282,18 @@ public:
return NamingClass != 0;
}
/// \brief Set whether the name lookup is triggered by a
/// using declaration.
void setUsingDeclaration(bool U) {
UsingDeclaration = U;
}
/// \brief Returns whether the name lookup is triggered by a
/// using declaration.
bool isUsingDeclaration() const {
return UsingDeclaration;
}
/// \brief Returns the 'naming class' for this lookup, i.e. the
/// class which was looked into to find these results.
///
@ -603,6 +615,10 @@ private:
bool HideTags;
bool Diagnose;
/// \brief True if the lookup is triggered by a using declaration.
/// Necessary to handle a MSVC bug.
bool UsingDeclaration;
};
/// \brief Consumes visible declarations found when searching for

View File

@ -146,8 +146,10 @@ struct AccessTarget : public AccessedEntity {
MemberNonce _,
CXXRecordDecl *NamingClass,
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl,
QualType BaseObjectType)
: AccessedEntity(Context, Member, NamingClass, FoundDecl, BaseObjectType) {
QualType BaseObjectType,
bool IsUsingDecl = false)
: AccessedEntity(Context, Member, NamingClass, FoundDecl, BaseObjectType),
IsUsingDeclaration(IsUsingDecl) {
initialize();
}
@ -216,6 +218,7 @@ private:
DeclaringClass = DeclaringClass->getCanonicalDecl();
}
bool IsUsingDeclaration : 1;
bool HasInstanceContext : 1;
mutable bool CalculatedInstanceContext : 1;
mutable const CXXRecordDecl *InstanceContext;
@ -1129,6 +1132,44 @@ static void DiagnoseBadAccess(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc,
DiagnoseAccessPath(S, EC, Entity);
}
/// MSVC has a bug where if during an using declaration name lookup,
/// the declaration found is unaccessible (private) and that declaration
/// was bring into scope via another using declaration whose target
/// declaration is accessible (public) then no error is generated.
/// Example:
/// class A {
/// public:
/// int f();
/// };
/// class B : public A {
/// private:
/// using A::f;
/// };
/// class C : public B {
/// private:
/// using B::f;
/// };
///
/// Here, B::f is private so this should fail in Standard C++, but
/// because B::f refers to A::f which is public MSVC accepts it.
static bool IsMicrosoftUsingDeclarationAccessBug(Sema& S,
SourceLocation AccessLoc,
AccessTarget &Entity) {
if (UsingShadowDecl *Shadow =
dyn_cast<UsingShadowDecl>(Entity.getTargetDecl())) {
const NamedDecl *OrigDecl = Entity.getTargetDecl()->getUnderlyingDecl();
if (Entity.getTargetDecl()->getAccess() == AS_private &&
(OrigDecl->getAccess() == AS_public ||
OrigDecl->getAccess() == AS_protected)) {
S.Diag(AccessLoc, diag::war_ms_using_declaration_inaccessible)
<< Shadow->getUsingDecl()->getQualifiedNameAsString()
<< OrigDecl->getQualifiedNameAsString();
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/// Determines whether the accessed entity is accessible. Public members
/// have been weeded out by this point.
static AccessResult IsAccessible(Sema &S,
@ -1232,6 +1273,10 @@ static AccessResult CheckEffectiveAccess(Sema &S,
AccessTarget &Entity) {
assert(Entity.getAccess() != AS_public && "called for public access!");
if (S.getLangOptions().Microsoft &&
IsMicrosoftUsingDeclarationAccessBug(S, Loc, Entity))
return AR_accessible;
switch (IsAccessible(S, EC, Entity)) {
case AR_dependent:
DelayDependentAccess(S, EC, Loc, Entity);
@ -1577,9 +1622,8 @@ void Sema::CheckLookupAccess(const LookupResult &R) {
if (I.getAccess() != AS_public) {
AccessTarget Entity(Context, AccessedEntity::Member,
R.getNamingClass(), I.getPair(),
R.getBaseObjectType());
R.getBaseObjectType(), R.isUsingDeclaration());
Entity.setDiag(diag::err_access);
CheckAccess(*this, R.getNameLoc(), Entity);
}
}

View File

@ -5345,6 +5345,7 @@ NamedDecl *Sema::BuildUsingDeclaration(Scope *S, AccessSpecifier AS,
// Otherwise, look up the target name.
LookupResult R(*this, NameInfo, LookupOrdinaryName);
R.setUsingDeclaration(true);
// Unlike most lookups, we don't always want to hide tag
// declarations: tag names are visible through the using declaration

View File

@ -197,3 +197,22 @@ void pointer_to_integral_type_conv(char* ptr) {
ch = (char)ptr;
sh = (short)ptr;
}
namespace ms_using_declaration_bug {
class A {
public:
int f();
};
class B : public A {
private:
using A::f;
};
class C : public B {
private:
using B::f; // expected-warning {{using declaration refers to inaccessible member 'ms_using_declaration_bug::B::f', which refers to accessible member 'ms_using_declaration_bug::A::f', accepted for Microsoft compatibility}}
};
}