[libc++][NFC] Mark LWG issue 2899 as not complete.
Commit 59e26308e6
accidentally
marked this LWG issue as complete but it has not yet been
implemented. D66262 fixes this issue.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5080840d28
commit
e2b6987204
|
@ -420,7 +420,7 @@
|
|||
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3182">3182</a></td><td>Specification of <tt>Same</tt> could be clearer</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2899">2899</a></td><td><tt>is_(nothrow_)move_constructible</tt> and <tt>tuple</tt>, <tt>optional</tt> and <tt>unique_ptr</tt></td><td>Cologne</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG2899">2899</a></td><td><tt>is_(nothrow_)move_constructible</tt> and <tt>tuple</tt>, <tt>optional</tt> and <tt>unique_ptr</tt></td><td>Cologne</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3055">3055</a></td><td><tt>path::operator+=(<i>single-character</i>)</tt> misspecified</td><td>Cologne</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3158">3158</a></td><td><tt>tuple(allocator_arg_t, const Alloc&)</tt> should be conditionally explicit</td><td>Cologne</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><a href="https://wg21.link/LWG3169">3169</a></td><td><tt>ranges</tt> permutation generators discard useful information</td><td>Cologne</td><td></td></tr>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue