[clangd] Do not show namespace comments.

Summary:
Comments from namespaces that clangd produces are too noisy and often
not useful.

Namespaces have too many redecls and we don't have a good way of
determining which of the comments are relevant and which should be
ignored (e.g. because they come from code generators like the protobuf
compiler).

Reviewers: sammccall

Reviewed By: sammccall

Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48211

llvm-svn: 335718
This commit is contained in:
Ilya Biryukov 2018-06-27 09:47:20 +00:00
parent 0a566bc0ae
commit da8dd8b800
2 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -80,8 +80,16 @@ std::string getDocComment(const ASTContext &Ctx,
if (Result.Kind != CodeCompletionResult::RK_Declaration)
return "";
auto *Decl = Result.getDeclaration();
if (!Decl || !canRequestComment(Ctx, *Decl, CommentsFromHeaders))
if (!Decl || llvm::isa<NamespaceDecl>(Decl)) {
// Namespaces often have too many redecls for any particular redecl comment
// to be useful. Moreover, we often confuse file headers or generated
// comments with namespace comments. Therefore we choose to just ignore
// the comments for namespaces.
return "";
}
if (!canRequestComment(Ctx, *Decl, CommentsFromHeaders))
return "";
const RawComment *RC = getCompletionComment(Ctx, Decl);
if (!RC)
return "";

View File

@ -1179,6 +1179,10 @@ TEST(CompletionTest, NonDocComments) {
ClangdServer Server(CDB, FS, DiagConsumer, ClangdServer::optsForTest());
Annotations Source(R"cpp(
// We ignore namespace comments, for rationale see CodeCompletionStrings.h.
namespace comments_ns {
}
// ------------------
int comments_foo();
@ -1223,6 +1227,7 @@ TEST(CompletionTest, NonDocComments) {
UnorderedElementsAre(AllOf(Not(IsDocumented()), Named("comments_foo")),
AllOf(IsDocumented(), Named("comments_baz")),
AllOf(IsDocumented(), Named("comments_quux")),
AllOf(Not(IsDocumented()), Named("comments_ns")),
// FIXME(ibiryukov): the following items should have
// empty documentation, since they are separated from
// a comment with an empty line. Unfortunately, I