Fix typos in comments

llvm-svn: 215777

llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsARM.td

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ def int_arm_thread_pointer : GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_thread_pointer">,
             Intrinsic<[llvm_ptr_ty], [], [IntrNoMem]>;
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// Saturating Arithmentic
+// Saturating Arithmetic
 
 def int_arm_qadd : GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_arm_qadd">,
     Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty],

llvm/lib/CodeGen/AtomicExpandLoadLinkedPass.cpp

@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool AtomicExpandLoadLinked::expandAtomicLoad(LoadInst *LI) {
           ? Monotonic
           : LI->getOrdering();
 
-  // The only 64-bit load guaranteed to be single-copy atomic by the ARM ARM is
+  // The only 64-bit load guaranteed to be single-copy atomic by the ARM is
   // an ldrexd (A3.5.3).
   IRBuilder<> Builder(LI);
   Value *Val = TM->getSubtargetImpl()->getTargetLowering()->emitLoadLinked(

llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64AddressTypePromotion.cpp

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 // a = add nsw i64 f, 3
 // e = getelementptr ..., i64 a
 //
-// This is legal to do so if the computations are markers with either nsw or nuw
+// This is legal to do if the computations are marked with either nsw or nuw
 // markers.
 // Moreover, the current heuristic is simple: it does not create new sext
 // operations, i.e., it gives up when a sext would have forked (e.g., if
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ AArch64AddressTypePromotion::shouldConsiderSExt(const Instruction *SExt) const {
 }
 
 // Input:
-// - SExtInsts contains all the sext instructions that are use direclty in
+// - SExtInsts contains all the sext instructions that are used directly in
 //   GetElementPtrInst, i.e., access to memory.
 // Algorithm:
 // - For each sext operation in SExtInsts:
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ AArch64AddressTypePromotion::propagateSignExtension(Instructions &SExtInsts) {
 
     // If the use is already of the right type, connect its uses to its argument
     // and delete it.
-    // This can happen for an Instruction which all uses are sign extended.
+    // This can happen for an Instruction all uses of which are sign extended.
     if (!ToRemove.count(SExt) &&
         SExt->getType() == SExt->getOperand(0)->getType()) {
       DEBUG(dbgs() << "Sign extension is useless, attach its use to "

llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp

@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ ARMTargetLowering::ARMTargetLowering(TargetMachine &TM)
     // On v8, we have particularly efficient implementations of atomic fences
     // if they can be combined with nearby atomic loads and stores.
     if (!Subtarget->hasV8Ops()) {
-      // Automatically insert fences (dmb ist) around ATOMIC_SWAP etc.
+      // Automatically insert fences (dmb ish) around ATOMIC_SWAP etc.
       setInsertFencesForAtomic(true);
     }
   } else {

llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMSubtarget.h

@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ public:
   // enableAtomicExpandLoadLinked - True if we need to expand our atomics.
   bool enableAtomicExpandLoadLinked() const override;
 
-  /// getInstrItins - Return the instruction itineraies based on subtarget
+  /// getInstrItins - Return the instruction itineraries based on subtarget
   /// selection.
   const InstrItineraryData *getInstrItineraryData() const {
     return &InstrItins;

llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonSubtarget.h

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ public:
   HexagonSubtarget(StringRef TT, StringRef CPU, StringRef FS,
                    const TargetMachine &TM);
 
-  /// getInstrItins - Return the instruction itineraies based on subtarget
+  /// getInstrItins - Return the instruction itineraries based on subtarget
   /// selection.
   const InstrItineraryData *getInstrItineraryData() const {
     return &InstrItins;