Fix the determination of whether a capture refers to an enclosing

scope when dealing with nested blocks. Fixes <rdar://problem/12778708>.

llvm-svn: 169065
This commit is contained in:
Douglas Gregor 2012-12-01 01:01:09 +00:00
parent 640a126d81
commit c401755f46
2 changed files with 16 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -10836,9 +10836,10 @@ bool Sema::tryCaptureVariable(VarDecl *Var, SourceLocation Loc,
// According to the blocks spec, the capture of a variable from
// the stack requires a const copy constructor. This is not true
// of the copy/move done to move a __block variable to the heap.
Expr *DeclRef = new (Context) DeclRefExpr(Var, false,
Expr *DeclRef = new (Context) DeclRefExpr(Var, Nested,
DeclRefType.withConst(),
VK_LValue, Loc);
ExprResult Result
= PerformCopyInitialization(
InitializedEntity::InitializeBlock(Var->getLocation(),
@ -10923,7 +10924,7 @@ bool Sema::tryCaptureVariable(VarDecl *Var, SourceLocation Loc,
if (BuildAndDiagnose) {
ExprResult Result = captureInLambda(*this, LSI, Var, CaptureType,
DeclRefType, Loc,
I == N-1);
Nested);
if (!Result.isInvalid())
CopyExpr = Result.take();
}

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10.0.0 -emit-llvm -o - %s -fexceptions -std=c++11 | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10.0.0 -fblocks -emit-llvm -o - %s -fexceptions -std=c++11 | FileCheck %s
// CHECK-NOT: @unused
auto unused = [](int i) { return i+1; };
@ -89,3 +89,14 @@ int g() {
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i32
// CHECK: define internal void @"_ZZ1e1ES_bEN3$_4D2Ev"
// <rdar://problem/12778708>
struct XXX {};
void nestedCapture () {
XXX localKey;
^() {
[&]() {
^{ XXX k = localKey; };
};
};
}