[InstCombine] Fold "x ?% y ==/!= 0" to "x & (y-1) ==/!= 0" iff y is power-of-two

Summary:
I have stumbled into this by accident while preparing to extend backend `x s% C ==/!= 0` handling.

While we did happen to handle this fold in most of the cases,
the folding is indirect - we fold `x u% y` to `x & (y-1)` (iff `y` is power-of-two),
or first turn `x s% -y` to `x u% y`; that does handle most of the cases.
But we can't turn `x s% INT_MIN` to `x u% -INT_MIN`,
and thus we end up being stuck with `(x s% INT_MIN) == 0`.

There is no such restriction for the more general fold:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/IIeS

To be noted, the fold does not enforce that `y` is a constant,
so it may indeed increase instruction count.
This is consistent with what `x u% y`->`x & (y-1)` already does.
I think it makes sense, it's at most one (simple) extra instruction,
while `rem`ainder is really much more un-simple (and likely **very** costly).

Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic, xbolva00, craig.topper

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65046

llvm-svn: 367322
This commit is contained in:
Roman Lebedev 2019-07-30 15:28:22 +00:00
parent c960c0a491
commit be612ea471
5 changed files with 54 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -1003,6 +1003,12 @@ struct is_idiv_op {
}
};
struct is_irem_op {
bool isOpType(unsigned Opcode) {
return Opcode == Instruction::SRem || Opcode == Instruction::URem;
}
};
/// Matches shift operations.
template <typename LHS, typename RHS>
inline BinOpPred_match<LHS, RHS, is_shift_op> m_Shift(const LHS &L,
@ -1038,6 +1044,13 @@ inline BinOpPred_match<LHS, RHS, is_idiv_op> m_IDiv(const LHS &L,
return BinOpPred_match<LHS, RHS, is_idiv_op>(L, R);
}
/// Matches integer remainder operations.
template <typename LHS, typename RHS>
inline BinOpPred_match<LHS, RHS, is_irem_op> m_IRem(const LHS &L,
const RHS &R) {
return BinOpPred_match<LHS, RHS, is_irem_op>(L, R);
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Class that matches exact binary ops.
//

View File

@ -1317,6 +1317,27 @@ static Instruction *processUGT_ADDCST_ADD(ICmpInst &I, Value *A, Value *B,
return ExtractValueInst::Create(Call, 1, "sadd.overflow");
}
/// If we have:
/// icmp eq/ne (urem/srem %x, %y), 0
/// iff %y is a power-of-two, we can replace this with a bit test:
/// icmp eq/ne (and %x, (add %y, -1)), 0
Instruction *InstCombiner::foldIRemByPowerOfTwoToBitTest(ICmpInst &I) {
// This fold is only valid for equality predicates.
if (!I.isEquality())
return nullptr;
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred;
Value *X, *Y, *Zero;
if (!match(&I, m_ICmp(Pred, m_OneUse(m_IRem(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))),
m_CombineAnd(m_Zero(), m_Value(Zero)))))
return nullptr;
if (!isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo(Y, /*OrZero*/ true, 0, &I))
return nullptr;
// This may increase instruction count, we don't enforce that Y is a constant.
Value *Mask = Builder.CreateAdd(Y, Constant::getAllOnesValue(Y->getType()));
Value *Masked = Builder.CreateAnd(X, Mask);
return ICmpInst::Create(Instruction::ICmp, Pred, Masked, Zero);
}
// Handle icmp pred X, 0
Instruction *InstCombiner::foldICmpWithZero(ICmpInst &Cmp) {
CmpInst::Predicate Pred = Cmp.getPredicate();
@ -1335,6 +1356,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::foldICmpWithZero(ICmpInst &Cmp) {
}
}
if (Instruction *New = foldIRemByPowerOfTwoToBitTest(Cmp))
return New;
// Given:
// icmp eq/ne (urem %x, %y), 0
// Iff %x has 0 or 1 bits set, and %y has at least 2 bits set, omit 'urem':

View File

@ -839,6 +839,7 @@ private:
Instruction *foldICmpInstWithConstantNotInt(ICmpInst &Cmp);
Instruction *foldICmpBinOp(ICmpInst &Cmp);
Instruction *foldICmpEquality(ICmpInst &Cmp);
Instruction *foldIRemByPowerOfTwoToBitTest(ICmpInst &I);
Instruction *foldICmpWithZero(ICmpInst &Cmp);
Instruction *foldICmpSelectConstant(ICmpInst &Cmp, SelectInst *Select,

View File

@ -1319,6 +1319,8 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitURem(BinaryOperator &I) {
Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1);
Type *Ty = I.getType();
if (isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo(Op1, /*OrZero*/ true, 0, &I)) {
// This may increase instruction count, we don't enforce that Y is a
// constant.
Constant *N1 = Constant::getAllOnesValue(Ty);
Value *Add = Builder.CreateAdd(Op1, N1);
return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(Op0, Add);

View File

@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ define <2 x i19> @weird_vec_power_of_2_constant_splat_divisor(<2 x i19> %A) {
define i1 @test3a(i32 %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3a(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B1:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 7
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[B1]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 7
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[TMP1]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
;
%B = srem i32 %A, -8
@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ define i1 @test3a(i32 %A) {
define <2 x i1> @test3a_vec(<2 x i32> %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3a_vec(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B1:%.*]] = and <2 x i32> [[A:%.*]], <i32 7, i32 7>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne <2 x i32> [[B1]], zeroinitializer
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and <2 x i32> [[A:%.*]], <i32 7, i32 7>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne <2 x i32> [[TMP1]], zeroinitializer
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i1> [[C]]
;
%B = srem <2 x i32> %A, <i32 -8, i32 -8>
@ -681,8 +681,8 @@ define <2 x i1> @test24_vec(<2 x i32> %A) {
define i1 @test25(i32 %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test25(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = srem i32 [[A:%.*]], -2147483648
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[B]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 2147483647
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[TMP1]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
;
%B = srem i32 %A, 2147483648 ; signbit
@ -692,8 +692,8 @@ define i1 @test25(i32 %A) {
define <2 x i1> @test25_vec(<2 x i32> %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test25_vec(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = srem <2 x i32> [[A:%.*]], <i32 -2147483648, i32 -2147483648>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne <2 x i32> [[B]], zeroinitializer
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and <2 x i32> [[A:%.*]], <i32 2147483647, i32 2147483647>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp ne <2 x i32> [[TMP1]], zeroinitializer
; CHECK-NEXT: ret <2 x i1> [[C]]
;
%B = srem <2 x i32> %A, <i32 2147483648, i32 2147483648>
@ -703,9 +703,10 @@ define <2 x i1> @test25_vec(<2 x i32> %A) {
define i1 @test26(i32 %A, i32 %B) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test26(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = shl nuw i32 1, [[B:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[D:%.*]] = srem i32 [[A:%.*]], [[C]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[E:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[D]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[NOTMASK:%.*]] = shl nsw i32 -1, [[B:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = xor i32 [[NOTMASK]], -1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = and i32 [[TMP1]], [[A:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[E:%.*]] = icmp ne i32 [[TMP2]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[E]]
;
%C = shl i32 1, %B ; not a constant
@ -729,8 +730,8 @@ define i1 @test27(i32 %A, i32* %remdst) {
define i1 @test28(i32 %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test28(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[B:%.*]] = srem i32 [[A:%.*]], -2147483648
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[B]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = and i32 [[A:%.*]], 2147483647
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C:%.*]] = icmp eq i32 [[TMP1]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[C]]
;
%B = srem i32 %A, 2147483648 ; signbit