[RecursiveASTVisitor] Fix post-order traversal of UnaryOperator

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, klimek, doug.gregor, teemperor, rsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26742

llvm-svn: 288923
This commit is contained in:
Malcolm Parsons 2016-12-07 17:39:04 +00:00
parent c894ac8163
commit b2b0cb7ca8
2 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ public:
#define OPERATOR(NAME) \
bool TraverseUnary##NAME(UnaryOperator *S, \
DataRecursionQueue *Queue = nullptr) { \
TRY_TO(WalkUpFromUnary##NAME(S)); \
if (!getDerived().shouldTraversePostOrder()) \
TRY_TO(WalkUpFromUnary##NAME(S)); \
TRY_TO_TRAVERSE_OR_ENQUEUE_STMT(S->getSubExpr()); \
return true; \
} \

View File

@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ namespace {
bool shouldTraversePostOrder() const { return VisitPostOrder; }
bool VisitUnaryOperator(UnaryOperator *Op) {
VisitedNodes.push_back(Op->getOpcodeStr(Op->getOpcode()));
return true;
}
bool VisitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator *Op) {
VisitedNodes.push_back(Op->getOpcodeStr());
return true;
@ -76,7 +81,7 @@ TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, PostOrderTraversal) {
auto ASTUnit = tooling::buildASTFromCode(
"class A {"
" class B {"
" int foo() { while(4) { int i = 9; } return (1 + 3) + 2; }"
" int foo() { while(4) { int i = 9; int j = -i; } return (1 + 3) + 2; }"
" };"
"};"
);
@ -87,7 +92,7 @@ TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, PostOrderTraversal) {
Visitor.TraverseTranslationUnitDecl(TU);
std::vector<std::string> expected = {
"4", "9", "i", "1", "3", "+", "2", "+", "return", "A::B::foo", "A::B", "A"
"4", "9", "i", "-", "j", "1", "3", "+", "2", "+", "return", "A::B::foo", "A::B", "A"
};
// Compare the list of actually visited nodes
// with the expected list of visited nodes.