Attaching comments to redeclarations: fix wrong assumptions

The reason for the recent fallout for "attaching comments to any redeclaration"
change are two false assumptions:
(1) a RawComment is attached to a single decl (not true for 'typedef struct X *Y'
    where we want the comment to be attached to both X and Y);
(2) the whole redeclaration chain has only a single comment (obviously false, the
    user can put a separate comment for each redeclaration).

To fix (1) I revert the part of the recent change where a 'Decl*' member was
introduced to RawComment.  Now ASTContext has a separate DenseMap for mapping
'Decl*' to 'FullComment*'.

To fix (2) I just removed the test with this assumption.  We might not parse
every comment in redecl chain if we already parsed at least one.

llvm-svn: 161878
This commit is contained in:
Dmitri Gribenko 2012-08-14 17:17:18 +00:00
parent 378b292aab
commit b261088a61
6 changed files with 84 additions and 51 deletions

View File

@ -485,6 +485,10 @@ public:
/// lazily.
mutable llvm::DenseMap<const Decl *, RawCommentAndCacheFlags> RedeclComments;
/// \brief Mapping from declarations to parsed comments attached to any
/// redeclaration.
mutable llvm::DenseMap<const Decl *, comments::FullComment *> ParsedComments;
/// \brief Return the documentation comment attached to a given declaration,
/// without looking into cache.
RawComment *getRawCommentForDeclNoCache(const Decl *D) const;

View File

@ -55,16 +55,11 @@ public:
/// Is this comment attached to any declaration?
bool isAttached() const LLVM_READONLY {
return !DeclOrParsedComment.isNull();
return IsAttached;
}
/// Return the declaration that this comment is attached to.
const Decl *getDecl() const;
/// Set the declaration that this comment is attached to.
void setDecl(const Decl *D) {
assert(DeclOrParsedComment.isNull());
DeclOrParsedComment = D;
void setAttached() {
IsAttached = true;
}
/// Returns true if it is a comment that should be put after a member:
@ -118,28 +113,23 @@ public:
return extractBriefText(Context);
}
/// Returns a \c FullComment AST node, parsing the comment if needed.
comments::FullComment *getParsed(const ASTContext &Context) const {
if (comments::FullComment *FC =
DeclOrParsedComment.dyn_cast<comments::FullComment *>())
return FC;
return parse(Context);
}
/// Parse the comment, assuming it is attached to decl \c D.
comments::FullComment *parse(const ASTContext &Context, const Decl *D) const;
private:
SourceRange Range;
mutable StringRef RawText;
mutable const char *BriefText;
mutable llvm::PointerUnion<const Decl *, comments::FullComment *>
DeclOrParsedComment;
mutable bool RawTextValid : 1; ///< True if RawText is valid
mutable bool BriefTextValid : 1; ///< True if BriefText is valid
unsigned Kind : 3;
/// True if comment is attached to a declaration in ASTContext.
bool IsAttached : 1;
bool IsTrailingComment : 1;
bool IsAlmostTrailingComment : 1;
@ -152,7 +142,7 @@ private:
RawComment(SourceRange SR, CommentKind K, bool IsTrailingComment,
bool IsAlmostTrailingComment) :
Range(SR), RawTextValid(false), BriefTextValid(false), Kind(K),
IsTrailingComment(IsTrailingComment),
IsAttached(false), IsTrailingComment(IsTrailingComment),
IsAlmostTrailingComment(IsAlmostTrailingComment),
BeginLineValid(false), EndLineValid(false)
{ }
@ -161,8 +151,6 @@ private:
const char *extractBriefText(const ASTContext &Context) const;
comments::FullComment *parse(const ASTContext &Context) const;
friend class ASTReader;
};

View File

@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForDeclNoCache(const Decl *D) const {
if (D->isImplicit())
return NULL;
// User can not attach documentation to implicit instantiations.
if (const FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
if (FD->getTemplateSpecializationKind() == TSK_ImplicitInstantiation)
return NULL;
}
// TODO: handle comments for function parameters properly.
if (isa<ParmVarDecl>(D))
return NULL;
@ -145,7 +151,6 @@ RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForDeclNoCache(const Decl *D) const {
SourceMgr.getLineNumber(DeclLocDecomp.first, DeclLocDecomp.second)
== SourceMgr.getLineNumber(CommentBeginDecomp.first,
CommentBeginDecomp.second)) {
(*Comment)->setDecl(D);
return *Comment;
}
}
@ -185,13 +190,13 @@ RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForDeclNoCache(const Decl *D) const {
if (Text.find_first_of(",;{}#@") != StringRef::npos)
return NULL;
(*Comment)->setDecl(D);
return *Comment;
}
const RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForAnyRedecl(const Decl *D) const {
// If we have a 'templated' declaration for a template, adjust 'D' to
// refer to the actual template.
namespace {
/// If we have a 'templated' declaration for a template, adjust 'D' to
/// refer to the actual template.
const Decl *adjustDeclToTemplate(const Decl *D) {
if (const FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
if (const FunctionTemplateDecl *FTD = FD->getDescribedFunctionTemplate())
D = FTD;
@ -200,6 +205,12 @@ const RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForAnyRedecl(const Decl *D) const {
D = CTD;
}
// FIXME: Alias templates?
return D;
}
} // unnamed namespace
const RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForAnyRedecl(const Decl *D) const {
D = adjustDeclToTemplate(D);
// Check whether we have cached a comment for this declaration already.
{
@ -259,11 +270,20 @@ const RawComment *ASTContext::getRawCommentForAnyRedecl(const Decl *D) const {
}
comments::FullComment *ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(const Decl *D) const {
D = adjustDeclToTemplate(D);
const Decl *Canonical = D->getCanonicalDecl();
llvm::DenseMap<const Decl *, comments::FullComment *>::iterator Pos =
ParsedComments.find(Canonical);
if (Pos != ParsedComments.end())
return Pos->second;
const RawComment *RC = getRawCommentForAnyRedecl(D);
if (!RC)
return NULL;
return RC->getParsed(*this);
comments::FullComment *FC = RC->parse(*this, D);
ParsedComments[Canonical] = FC;
return FC;
}
void

View File

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ bool mergedCommentIsTrailingComment(StringRef Comment) {
RawComment::RawComment(const SourceManager &SourceMgr, SourceRange SR,
bool Merged) :
Range(SR), RawTextValid(false), BriefTextValid(false),
IsAlmostTrailingComment(false),
IsAttached(false), IsAlmostTrailingComment(false),
BeginLineValid(false), EndLineValid(false) {
// Extract raw comment text, if possible.
if (SR.getBegin() == SR.getEnd() || getRawText(SourceMgr).empty()) {
@ -87,16 +87,6 @@ RawComment::RawComment(const SourceManager &SourceMgr, SourceRange SR,
}
}
const Decl *RawComment::getDecl() const {
if (DeclOrParsedComment.isNull())
return NULL;
if (const Decl *D = DeclOrParsedComment.dyn_cast<const Decl *>())
return D;
return DeclOrParsedComment.get<comments::FullComment *>()->getDecl();
}
unsigned RawComment::getBeginLine(const SourceManager &SM) const {
if (BeginLineValid)
return BeginLine;
@ -169,7 +159,8 @@ const char *RawComment::extractBriefText(const ASTContext &Context) const {
return BriefTextPtr;
}
comments::FullComment *RawComment::parse(const ASTContext &Context) const {
comments::FullComment *RawComment::parse(const ASTContext &Context,
const Decl *D) const {
// Make sure that RawText is valid.
getRawText(Context.getSourceManager());
@ -179,13 +170,11 @@ comments::FullComment *RawComment::parse(const ASTContext &Context) const {
RawText.begin(), RawText.end());
comments::Sema S(Context.getAllocator(), Context.getSourceManager(),
Context.getDiagnostics(), Traits);
S.setDecl(getDecl());
S.setDecl(D);
comments::Parser P(L, S, Context.getAllocator(), Context.getSourceManager(),
Context.getDiagnostics(), Traits);
comments::FullComment *FC = P.parseFullComment();
DeclOrParsedComment = FC;
return FC;
return P.parseFullComment();
}
namespace {

View File

@ -7623,7 +7623,9 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnStartOfFunctionDef(Scope *FnBodyScope, Decl *D) {
<< FD->getName() << "dllimport";
}
}
ActOnDocumentableDecl(FD);
// We want to attach documentation to original Decl (which might be
// a function template).
ActOnDocumentableDecl(D);
return FD;
}

View File

@ -624,13 +624,9 @@ class test_attach37 {
/// \brief\author Aaa
/// \tparam T Aaa
void test_attach38(int aaa, int bbb);
};
// expected-warning@+1 {{empty paragraph passed to '\brief' command}}
/// \brief\author Aaa
/// \tparam T Aaa
template<typename T>
void test_attach37<T>::test_attach38(int aaa, int bbb) {}
void test_attach39(int aaa, int bbb);
};
// expected-warning@+2 {{empty paragraph passed to '\brief' command}}
// expected-warning@+2 {{template parameter 'T' not found in the template declaration}}
@ -639,6 +635,13 @@ void test_attach37<T>::test_attach38(int aaa, int bbb) {}
template<>
void test_attach37<int>::test_attach38(int aaa, int bbb) {}
// expected-warning@+1 {{empty paragraph passed to '\brief' command}}
/// \brief\author Aaa
/// \tparam T Aaa
template<typename T>
void test_attach37<T>::test_attach39(int aaa, int bbb) {}
// PR13411, reduced. We used to crash on this.
/**
@ -652,7 +655,7 @@ void test_nocrash1(int);
/// \param\brief
void test_nocrash2(int);
// PR13593
// PR13593, example 1 and 2
/**
* Bla.
@ -668,3 +671,30 @@ template <typename>
void test_nocrash3()
{
}
// PR13593, example 3
/**
* aaa
*/
template <typename T>
inline T test_nocrash5(T a1)
{
return a1;
}
///
//,
inline void test_nocrash6()
{
test_nocrash5(1);
}
// We used to crash on this.
/*!
Blah.
*/
typedef const struct test_nocrash7 * test_nocrash8;