replica
/
hanchenye-llvm-project
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[analyzer] Enable c++-allocator-inlining by default. 

This allows the analyzer to analyze ("inline") custom operator new() calls and,
even more importantly, inline constructors of objects that were allocated
by any operator new() - not necessarily a custom one.

All changes in the tests in the current commit are intended improvements,
even if they didn't carry any explicit FIXME flag.

It is possible to restore the old behavior via

  -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=false

(this flag is supported by scan-build as well, and it can be into a clang
--analyze invocation via -Xclang .. -Xclang ..). There is no intention to
remove the old behavior for now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42219
rdar://problem/12180598

llvm-svn: 323373
This commit is contained in:
Artem Dergachev 2018-01-24 20:59:40 +00:00
parent 538921dc86
commit a396df3472
5 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/AnalyzerOptions.cpp
View File

@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ bool AnalyzerOptions::mayInlineTemplateFunctions() {
bool AnalyzerOptions::mayInlineCXXAllocator() {
return getBooleanOption(InlineCXXAllocator,
"c++-allocator-inlining",
/*Default=*/false);
/*Default=*/true);
}
bool AnalyzerOptions::mayInlineCXXContainerMethods() {

8
clang/test/Analysis/NewDelete-custom.cpp
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -DLEAKS=1 -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=true -DALLOCATOR_INLINING=1 -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=true -DLEAKS=1 -DALLOCATOR_INLINING=1 -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=false -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=false -DLEAKS=1 -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -DALLOCATOR_INLINING=1 -fblocks -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDelete,cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks,unix.Malloc -std=c++11 -DLEAKS=1 -DALLOCATOR_INLINING=1 -fblocks -verify %s
#include "Inputs/system-header-simulator-cxx.h"
#if !(LEAKS && !ALLOCATOR_INLINING)

8
clang/test/Analysis/ctor.mm
View File

@ -572,10 +572,9 @@ namespace ZeroInitialization {
}
void testNew() {
// FIXME: Pending proper implementation of constructors for 'new'.
raw_pair *pp = new raw_pair();
clang_analyzer_eval(pp->p1 == 0); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
clang_analyzer_eval(pp->p2 == 0); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
clang_analyzer_eval(pp->p1 == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(pp->p2 == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
void testArrayNew() {
@ -679,8 +678,7 @@ namespace InitializerList {
void testDynamic() {
List *list = new List{1, 2};
// FIXME: When we handle constructors with 'new', this will be TRUE.
clang_analyzer_eval(list->usedInitializerList); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
clang_analyzer_eval(list->usedInitializerList); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
}

5
clang/test/Analysis/new.cpp
View File

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ void *testPlacementNew() {
void *y = new (x) int;
clang_analyzer_eval(x == y); // expected-warning{{TRUE}};
clang_analyzer_eval(*x == 1); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}};
clang_analyzer_eval(*x == 1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}};
return y;
}
@ -200,8 +200,7 @@ int testNoInitializationPlacement() {
int n;
new (&n) int;
// Should warn that n is uninitialized.
if (n) { // no-warning
if (n) { // expected-warning{{Branch condition evaluates to a garbage value}}
return 0;
}
return 1;

3
clang/test/Analysis/virtualcall.cpp
View File

@ -262,6 +262,9 @@ int main() {
//expected-note-re@-2 {{{{^}}Calling default constructor for 'M'}}
#endif
Y *y = new Y;
#if !PUREONLY
//expected-note-re@-2 {{{{^}}Calling default constructor for 'Y'}}
#endif
delete y;
header::Z z;
#if !PUREONLY