PR33503: When a qualified name in a redeclaration names a prior declaration in

an inline namespace, update its semantic DeclContext to match.

We would previously get the semantic DeclContext wrong (pointing to the named
scope rather than the inline namespace within it), resulting in wrong lookup
results and linkage-related problems if the inline namespace was an anonymous
namespace.

llvm-svn: 321770
This commit is contained in:
Richard Smith 2018-01-03 23:03:54 +00:00
parent 9cded98ad6
commit 9fb4e60d7d
2 changed files with 75 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -2929,6 +2929,48 @@ static bool hasIdenticalPassObjectSizeAttrs(const FunctionDecl *A,
return std::equal(A->param_begin(), A->param_end(), B->param_begin(), AttrEq);
}
/// If necessary, adjust the semantic declaration context for a qualified
/// declaration to name the correct inline namespace within the qualifier.
static void adjustDeclContextForDeclaratorDecl(DeclaratorDecl *NewD,
DeclaratorDecl *OldD) {
// The only case where we need to update the DeclContext is when
// redeclaration lookup for a qualified name finds a declaration
// in an inline namespace within the context named by the qualifier:
//
// inline namespace N { int f(); }
// int ::f(); // Sema DC needs adjusting from :: to N::.
//
// For unqualified declarations, the semantic context *can* change
// along the redeclaration chain (for local extern declarations,
// extern "C" declarations, and friend declarations in particular).
if (!NewD->getQualifier())
return;
// NewD is probably already in the right context.
auto *NamedDC = NewD->getDeclContext()->getRedeclContext();
auto *SemaDC = OldD->getDeclContext()->getRedeclContext();
if (NamedDC->Equals(SemaDC))
return;
assert((NamedDC->InEnclosingNamespaceSetOf(SemaDC) ||
NewD->isInvalidDecl() || OldD->isInvalidDecl()) &&
"unexpected context for redeclaration");
auto *LexDC = NewD->getLexicalDeclContext();
auto FixSemaDC = [=](NamedDecl *D) {
if (!D)
return;
D->setDeclContext(SemaDC);
D->setLexicalDeclContext(LexDC);
};
FixSemaDC(NewD);
if (auto *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(NewD))
FixSemaDC(FD->getDescribedFunctionTemplate());
else if (auto *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(NewD))
FixSemaDC(VD->getDescribedVarTemplate());
}
/// MergeFunctionDecl - We just parsed a function 'New' from
/// declarator D which has the same name and scope as a previous
/// declaration 'Old'. Figure out how to resolve this situation,
@ -3953,6 +3995,7 @@ void Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, LookupResult &Previous) {
New->setPreviousDecl(Old);
if (NewTemplate)
NewTemplate->setPreviousDecl(OldTemplate);
adjustDeclContextForDeclaratorDecl(New, Old);
// Inherit access appropriately.
New->setAccess(Old->getAccess());
@ -9252,12 +9295,13 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *NewFD,
if (FunctionTemplateDecl *OldTemplateDecl
= dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(OldDecl)) {
NewFD->setPreviousDeclaration(OldTemplateDecl->getTemplatedDecl());
auto *OldFD = OldTemplateDecl->getTemplatedDecl();
NewFD->setPreviousDeclaration(OldFD);
adjustDeclContextForDeclaratorDecl(NewFD, OldFD);
FunctionTemplateDecl *NewTemplateDecl
= NewFD->getDescribedFunctionTemplate();
assert(NewTemplateDecl && "Template/non-template mismatch");
if (CXXMethodDecl *Method
= dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(NewTemplateDecl->getTemplatedDecl())) {
if (auto *Method = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(NewFD)) {
Method->setAccess(OldTemplateDecl->getAccess());
NewTemplateDecl->setAccess(OldTemplateDecl->getAccess());
}
@ -9270,22 +9314,22 @@ bool Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration(Scope *S, FunctionDecl *NewFD,
assert(OldTemplateDecl->isMemberSpecialization());
// Explicit specializations of a member template do not inherit deleted
// status from the parent member template that they are specializing.
if (OldTemplateDecl->getTemplatedDecl()->isDeleted()) {
FunctionDecl *const OldTemplatedDecl =
OldTemplateDecl->getTemplatedDecl();
if (OldFD->isDeleted()) {
// FIXME: This assert will not hold in the presence of modules.
assert(OldTemplatedDecl->getCanonicalDecl() == OldTemplatedDecl);
assert(OldFD->getCanonicalDecl() == OldFD);
// FIXME: We need an update record for this AST mutation.
OldTemplatedDecl->setDeletedAsWritten(false);
OldFD->setDeletedAsWritten(false);
}
}
} else {
if (shouldLinkDependentDeclWithPrevious(NewFD, OldDecl)) {
auto *OldFD = cast<FunctionDecl>(OldDecl);
// This needs to happen first so that 'inline' propagates.
NewFD->setPreviousDeclaration(cast<FunctionDecl>(OldDecl));
NewFD->setPreviousDeclaration(OldFD);
adjustDeclContextForDeclaratorDecl(NewFD, OldFD);
if (isa<CXXMethodDecl>(NewFD))
NewFD->setAccess(OldDecl->getAccess());
NewFD->setAccess(OldFD->getAccess());
}
}
} else if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && MayNeedOverloadableChecks &&

View File

@ -101,4 +101,25 @@ namespace inline_namespaces {
template<> struct N::V<int> {};
template struct N::V<int*>;
template struct N::V<char>; // expected-error {{undefined}}
struct Q {};
// Perversely, inline anonymous namespaces can cause an ostensibly
// external-linkage declaration to acquire internal linkage when
// redeclared with a qualified name.
inline namespace {
struct Q {} q;
int f_in_inline();
extern int v_in_inline;
typedef int t_in_inline;
}
// FIXME: These "extra qualification" warnings are bogus: the qualification
// changes the meaning of the program.
int inline_namespaces::f_in_inline() { // expected-warning {{extra qualification}}
// Finds <anon>::Q, not inline_namespaces::Q
Q x = q;
return 0;
}
int inline_namespaces::v_in_inline = // expected-warning {{extra qualification}}
(Q(q), 0);
}