Revert "Revert "Revert "[IndVars] Canonicalize comparisons between non-negative values and indvars"""

It appears that the problem is still there. Needs more analysis to understand why
SaturatedMultiply test fails.

llvm-svn: 307249
This commit is contained in:
Max Kazantsev 2017-07-06 10:47:13 +00:00
parent 3ae33209cc
commit 98838527c6
5 changed files with 6 additions and 62 deletions

View File

@ -264,10 +264,6 @@ void SimplifyIndvar::eliminateIVComparison(ICmpInst *ICmp, Value *IVOperand) {
ICmp->setPredicate(InvariantPredicate);
ICmp->setOperand(0, NewLHS);
ICmp->setOperand(1, NewRHS);
} else if (ICmpInst::isSigned(Pred) &&
SE->isKnownNonNegative(S) && SE->isKnownNonNegative(X)) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "INDVARS: Turn to unsigned comparison: " << *ICmp << '\n');
ICmp->setPredicate(ICmpInst::getUnsignedPredicate(Pred));
} else
return;

View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ entry:
loop:
; CHECK: loop:
; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 true) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK: %iv.inc.cmp = icmp ult i32 %iv.inc, %len
; CHECK: %iv.inc.cmp = icmp slt i32 %iv.inc, %len
; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %iv.inc.cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK: leave:
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ leave:
define void @test_2(i32 %n, i32* %len_buf) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_2(
; CHECK: [[LEN_ZEXT:%[^ ]+]] = zext i32 %len to i64
; CHECK: [[LEN_SEXT:%[^ ]+]] = sext i32 %len to i64
; CHECK: br label %loop
entry:
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ loop:
; CHECK: loop:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ]
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
; CHECK: %iv.inc.cmp = icmp ult i64 %indvars.iv.next, [[LEN_ZEXT]]
; CHECK: %iv.inc.cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv.next, [[LEN_SEXT]]
; CHECK: call void (i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %iv.inc.cmp) [ "deopt"() ]
; CHECK: leave:

View File

@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
; RUN: opt -S -indvars < %s | FileCheck %s
; Check that we replace signed comparisons between non-negative values with
; unsigned comparisons if we can.
target datalayout = "n8:16:32:64"
define i32 @test_01(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_01(
; CHECK-NOT: icmp slt
; CHECK: %cmp1 = icmp ult i32 %iv, 100
; CHECK: %cmp2 = icmp ult i32 %iv, 100
; CHECK-NOT: %cmp3
; CHECK: %exitcond = icmp ne i32 %iv.next, 1000
entry:
br label %loop.entry
loop.entry:
%iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop.be ]
%cmp1 = icmp slt i32 %iv, 100
br i1 %cmp1, label %b1, label %b2
b1:
store i32 %iv, i32* %p
br label %merge
b2:
store i32 %a, i32* %p
br label %merge
merge:
%cmp2 = icmp ult i32 %iv, 100
br i1 %cmp2, label %b3, label %b4
b3:
store i32 %iv, i32* %p
br label %loop.be
b4:
store i32 %b, i32* %p
br label %loop.be
loop.be:
%iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
%cmp3 = icmp slt i32 %iv.next, 1000
br i1 %cmp3, label %loop.entry, label %exit
exit:
ret i32 %iv
}

View File

@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ return:
; Indvars should not turn the second loop into an infinite one.
; CHECK-LABEL: @func_11(
; CHECK: %tmp5 = icmp ult i32 %__key6.0, 10
; CHECK: %tmp5 = icmp slt i32 %__key6.0, 10
; CHECK-NOT: br i1 true, label %noassert68, label %unrolledend
define i32 @func_11() nounwind uwtable {
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ declare void @llvm.trap() noreturn nounwind
; In this case the second loop only has a single iteration, fold the header away
; CHECK-LABEL: @func_12(
; CHECK: %tmp5 = icmp ult i32 %__key6.0, 10
; CHECK: %tmp5 = icmp slt i32 %__key6.0, 10
; CHECK: br i1 true, label %noassert68, label %unrolledend
define i32 @func_12() nounwind uwtable {
entry:

View File

@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ for.end:
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
; CHECK: for.body4.us
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
; CHECK: %cmp2.us = icmp ult i64
; CHECK: %cmp2.us = icmp slt i64
; CHECK-NOT: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
; CHECK-NOT: %cmp2.us = icmp slt i32