Fix PR1965: missing diagnostics for parameters that are missing

type specifiers.  This required updating some (buggy) tests, and the
testcase was previously accidentally committed.

llvm-svn: 46603
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2008-01-31 06:10:07 +00:00
parent 4973fb9273
commit 7f024fe0c6
3 changed files with 20 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1350,6 +1350,20 @@ void Parser::ParseParenDeclarator(Declarator &D) {
ParmII->getName());
ParmII = 0;
}
// If no parameter was specified, verify that *something* was specified,
// otherwise we have a missing type and identifier.
if (!DS.hasTypeSpecifier()) {
if (ParmII)
Diag(ParmDecl.getIdentifierLoc(),
diag::err_param_requires_type_specifier, ParmII->getName());
else
Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_anon_param_requires_type_specifier);
// Default the parameter to 'int'.
const char *PrevSpec = 0;
DS.SetTypeSpecType(DeclSpec::TST_int, Tok.getLocation(), PrevSpec);
}
ParamInfo.push_back(DeclaratorChunk::ParamInfo(ParmII,
ParmDecl.getIdentifierLoc(), ParamTy.Val, ParmDecl.getInvalidType(),

View File

@ -542,6 +542,11 @@ DIAG(ext_vla, EXTENSION,
"variable length arrays are a C99 feature, accepted as an extension")
DIAG(err_invalid_storage_class_in_func_decl, ERROR,
"invalid storage class specifier in function declarator")
DIAG(err_anon_param_requires_type_specifier, ERROR,
"type specifier required for unnamed parameter")
DIAG(err_param_requires_type_specifier, ERROR,
"type specifier required for parameter '%0'")
DIAG(err_invalid_reference_qualifier_application, ERROR,
"'%0' qualifier may not be applied to a reference")
DIAG(err_declarator_need_ident, ERROR,

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ void f0();
void f1(int [*]);
void f2(int [const *]);
void f3(int [volatile const*]);
int f4(*XX)(void); /* expected-error {{cannot return}} */
int f4(*XX)(void); /* expected-error {{cannot return}} expected-error {{type specifier required}} */
char ((((*X))));